If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Robert wrote:
I am upgrading from an Oly C4040. and I am trying to decide between the Evolt, EOS 300D, EOS 350D, and the EOS 20D. Mainly between the Evolt and the EOS 350D. I know the Oly has the CCD and the Canon has the CMOS. Back When I bought the C4040 I read that the CCD was the way to go. I am not sure now. Any advice and comments between the EOS 350D and the Evolt would be greatly appreciated. CMOS got its start as a cheap sensor technology not used in even decent consumer digicams; it was typically found in webcams. Canon's technology changed all that; it's arguably the best sensor technology available today, especially in terms of sensitivity. As others have said, if the money's not an issue, get the 20D. Superb camera. If money is tighter, I'd lean towards the 350D, and I'd also check out the Nikon D70 and D70s. -- Albert Nurick | Nurick + Associates - Web Design | eCommerce - Content Management www.nurick.com | Web Applications - Hosting |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Robert wrote:
Any advice and comments between the EOS 350D and the Evolt would be greatly appreciated. My advice is to go somewhere that will let you shoot a couple of shots with both and have a couple of prints made on the spot (or take them home, you'll need 2 CF cards for that.) . I took my own CF cards to a local pro shop, shot with a 10D-20D, then did the same with the E1-E300. I then looked at the features both had, if they had good lenses avalible that would do what I needed and then tried to look at issues like which focus screen worked well manually focusing the lens for macro work, do I like the view I see looking through the finder, how I like the feel/handling of the camera and made my choice based on my own personal preferences rather than reading what someone else likes. There are also issues like which has a better kit lens (lenses?) if you're going to be stuck with that for a while, which has better high ISO performance if you need that, if you want to deal with cleaning the sensor (if you're not going to be changing lenses much that's not an issue at all), if you are going to be doing post processing (don't mind using noise reduction software) or need/want clean out of camera jpegs, will you be shooting RAW or Jpeg, do you need a spot meter or not, do you have lenses from an old system you want to use etc. These are choices -you- have to decide. Every camera has it's strong and weak points, you have to decide which ones are a problem and which aren't. If I was shooting nightclubs using avalible light instead of landscapes, that would have changed which camera I bought. In the end, one camera had a look to the 8X10 prints I made that =I= prefered and that was what made my choice easy.. Someone else might have liked the other better, that's why this is so subjective. IMHO it is the end results in print that matter most to me and what looks good to me. I'm sure you'll get mostly "buy what I did" from your question, I'm not going to do that mainly because you haven't said enough about what you'll use this camera for to even make a recomendation. Some people believe their camera choice is "The best" for anyone, I don't agree. -- Stacey |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Well for the Evolt will have the best kit lenses by far and you cant
beat the value for money with the two lens kit. The only draw back would be the price of the better Zuiko lenses. Well you get what you pay for. If you can afford the 20D then why not get the best you can afford. Problem is if you're on a budget you might get stuck with a nice camera but only afford crappy lower end Canon lens which now wont show off the 20D capabilites. Yah buying digital cameras sucks but you need to decided what kidn fo photography you are going to be doing and then pick teh camera that is the best for you're style of shooting. A few months back I wanted to upgrade from my Canon D30 so I went with the Olympus E1 over the 20D. What won it for me was not the pixel count but how comfortable the camera felt and it offered options that no other camera had at its price range. The most important was the E1 being moisture/dust proof when used with the higher end Zuiko lenses and having a body made of magnesium. Anyways make sure you at least hold each camera and take some shots before you decide. Arek http://www.evolver.ca Robert wrote: I am upgrading from an Oly C4040. and I am trying to decide between the Evolt, EOS 300D, EOS 350D, and the EOS 20D. Mainly between the Evolt and the EOS 350D. I know the Oly has the CCD and the Canon has the CMOS. Back When I bought the C4040 I read that the CCD was the way to go. I am not sure now. Any advice and comments between the EOS 350D and the Evolt would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Robert |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert" wrote in message ... I am upgrading from an Oly C4040. and I am trying to decide between the Evolt, EOS 300D, EOS 350D, and the EOS 20D. Mainly between the Evolt and the EOS 350D. I know the Oly has the CCD and the Canon has the CMOS. Back When I bought the C4040 I read that the CCD was the way to go. I am not sure now. Any advice and comments between the EOS 350D and the Evolt would be greatly appreciated. The 20D is not in the same category as the 300D or 350D or the E-300. Obviously comparing just these models the 20D is the much better camera. But it is also more expensive, and if that is an issue then the equation becomes a little blurred. The standard Canon kit lenses are truly awful, so for the same money as a 20D with it's kit lens, you could get a 300D or 350D with a half decent lens (From what I've seen, even the much maligned sigma lenses perform better than Canon's cheap lenses). Using a 20D (or even the 300 or 350) with the kit lens is like using standard petrol and tyres with a Ferrari. I find the E-300 a bit of a quandary - it's kit lens is many orders of magnitude better than Canon kit lenses, it's build quality leaves the similar priced Canon's feeling like bits of plastic junk, but it is let down by a very noisy sensor and I found some of it's functions such as "hold the button down" exposure lock, and the lack of mirror lock up to be quite annoying. If you mainly shoot in daylight, and want to use it as an advanced P&S it is a great little camera - if you want to use it in low light situations or in tricky shooting situations it is a bit limited. The sensor cleaning function is fantastic however, and could tip the scales well away from any other models in this league. Why limit yourself to the models you listed? If you like the Olympus cameras and are looking at something in the same league as the 20D, the E-1 ships with an extremely good kit lens, and picture quality and camera features are miles ahead of the E-300 (despite the lower number of pixels). I'd prefer 5 million excellent pixels over 8 million average pixels any day. The E1's build quality is 2nd to none, it is very rugged, can handle a bit of rain or snow, and won't need to be sent for sensor cleaning every couple of months. If you are looking at something in a similar price range to the E300/300D/350D, I think it's hard to go past the Pentax *istDS. Build quality and feel is miles ahead of the Canons - again makes the Canons feel like plastic pieces of junk. Pentax lenses are excellent, or alternatively (here in Australia at least) it is often bundled with Sigma lenses which are not great but significantly better than the cheap Canon offerings. The camera is compatible with the zillions of K-mount lenses around, plus you can use the old screw-mount lenses with adapters. This gives you access to a huge variety of lenses, new & used, at all price/quality levels including some of the finest lenses that have ever been made. Another alternative is the highly rated Nikon D70 - it is an excellent camera, and the 18-70 DX lens is excellent. It is a bit higher priced than the E300/300D/350D/istDS, but quite a bit lower than the 20D. Personally I think they are a little on the large and heavy side, but they do feel solid. Thanks Robert |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Justin Thyme" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message The standard Canon kit lenses are truly awful, They look and feel awful, admittedly, but the image quality of the 18-55mm is surprisingly good. As good as the kit lens shipped with the E300. I've took quite a few shots with both, and the Canon seemed equal - although, it might well have been the E300's in-camera processing that was limiting the lens. I find the E-300 a bit of a quandary - it's kit lens is many orders of magnitude better than Canon kit lenses, it's build quality leaves the similar priced Canon's feeling like bits of plastic junk Not really - the E300 is every bit as plastic as the 350D - and the card door on the E300 is a joke. but it is let down by a very noisy sensor and I found some of it's functions such as "hold the button down" exposure lock, and the lack of mirror lock up to be quite annoying. I think that mirror lock-up has been added via firmware upgrade If you mainly shoot in daylight, and want to use it as an advanced P&S it is a great little camera Agreed - it is best regarded as a good P&S Why limit yourself to the models you listed? If you like the Olympus cameras and are looking at something in the same league as the 20D, the E-1 ships with an extremely good kit lens, and picture quality and camera features are miles ahead of the E-300 (despite the lower number of pixels) True - but, once again, the E1 is extremely noisy above 400 ISO (even above 200, sometimes) I think that consumers are far less tolerant of noise than they use to be - thanks largely to Canon, who have shown what is possible in 'cheap' end of the market. E300/300D/350D, I think it's hard to go past the Pentax *istDS. Build quality and feel is miles ahead of the Canons Why? - same plastic body, same plastic mirror mechanism. Another alternative is the highly rated Nikon D70 - it is an excellent camera, and the 18-70 DX lens is excellent. It is a bit higher priced than the E300/300D/350D/istDS, but quite a bit lower than the 20D. Personally I think they are a little on the large and heavy side, but they do feel solid. The D70 is noisier than the Pentax - no question. Also, the feeling of solidity comes entirely from the kit lens - take the lens off the body and you are left with a very lightweight, cheap feeling, plastic shell. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Aza" wrote in message ...
"Justin Thyme" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message The standard Canon kit lenses are truly awful, They look and feel awful, admittedly, but the image quality of the 18-55mm is surprisingly good. I keep reading this and I keep trying the 18-55 that came with my 300D and I keep putting it back in my bag swearing that I'll never use it again. It just plain sucks!!!! It's either out of focus or very soft. With that said I understand that there are two(?) versions of this lens so I may just have the cheaper crappy version, but I rarely use the lens and I'll be buy a good wide angle as soon as budget allows. -- Rob |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert R Kircher, Jr." wrote in message ... "Aza" wrote in message ... "Justin Thyme" wrote in message ... "Robert" wrote in message The standard Canon kit lenses are truly awful, They look and feel awful, admittedly, but the image quality of the 18-55mm is surprisingly good. I keep reading this and I keep trying the 18-55 that came with my 300D and I keep putting it back in my bag swearing that I'll never use it again. It just plain sucks!!!! It's either out of focus or very soft. With that said I understand that there are two(?) versions of this lens so I may just have the cheaper crappy version, but I rarely use the lens and I'll be buy a good wide angle as soon as budget allows. The only one I tried was the one bundled with the 350D. It is 'slightly' different, but is supposed to optically identical to the 18-55 that came with the 300D I didn't buy the camera in the end (for other reasons) but I've looked again at shots taken with the 350D lens and they're really quite good - noticeably more detailed than the Nikon D70 with the 18-70mm kit lenses, for example. Tiny writing on cans & bottles was far more legible with the Canon lens - whereas the Nikon 18-70 lost a lot of the individual lettering. I suppose that samples can vary. It certainly 'felt' a cheap 'and nasty lens, though. In the UK it seems to add about £50 to the cost of the 350D body - which is probably worth the money. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Another alternative is the highly rated Nikon D70 - it is an excellent
camera, and the 18-70 DX lens is excellent. It is a bit higher priced than the E300/300D/350D/istDS, but quite a bit lower than the 20D. Personally I think they are a little on the large and heavy side, but they do feel solid. Thanks Robert To start with you could get the 50mm 1.8 lens. Superb quality, very sharp, and cheap. This goes for Nikon's offering as well. A great lens to start with. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Waggener" wrote in message ... Another alternative is the highly rated Nikon D70 - it is an excellent camera, and the 18-70 DX lens is excellent. It is a bit higher priced than the E300/300D/350D/istDS, but quite a bit lower than the 20D. Personally I think they are a little on the large and heavy side, but they do feel solid. Thanks Robert To start with you could get the 50mm 1.8 lens. Superb quality, very sharp, and cheap. This goes for Nikon's offering as well. A great lens to start with. Or with the pentax he could get a 50/1.4 - well reknowned as one of the best lenses ever made. On a DSLR it becomes equivalent to a 75mm, which is a great length for portraits. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
To start with you could get the 50mm 1.8 lens. Superb quality, very
sharp, and cheap. This goes for Nikon's offering as well. A great lens to start with. Or with the pentax he could get a 50/1.4 - well reknowned as one of the best lenses ever made. On a DSLR it becomes equivalent to a 75mm, which is a great length for portraits. oops, yer right about the Pentax, forgot that one. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D70 dSLR or Nikon CP8800 Non dSLR (Non-CCD Cleaning!!) ?? | Digital Photography | 62 | March 18th 05 07:41 AM | |
Nikon D70 dSLR or Nikon CP8800 Non dSLR (Non-CCD Cleaning!!) ?? | Digital Photography | 0 | March 3rd 05 05:48 AM | |
DSLR cameras... | Developwebsites | Digital Photography | 17 | January 21st 05 08:33 PM |
Question regarding DSLR & CF when traveling. | Orion | Digital Photography | 6 | October 1st 04 04:08 PM |
Low end dSLR vs fim SLR | John Doe | 35mm Photo Equipment | 79 | September 15th 04 10:51 PM |