If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Why? That stuff was crap.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I used it: once. It was horrible. I could not get the highlights to
print at all, when they printed just fine with Ilfobrom, using comparable grades. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... Why? That stuff was crap. I see you still have a way with word. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... I used it: once. It was horrible. I could not get the highlights to print at all, when they printed just fine with Ilfobrom, using comparable grades. Sure, sure. You are probably confusing fogged paper with highlight exposure. I printed not ONE but thousands of images on Brovira. It was a fine paper. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... I used it: once. It was horrible. I could not get the highlights to print at all, when they printed just fine with Ilfobrom, using comparable grades. Sure, sure. You are probably confusing fogged paper with highlight exposure. I printed not ONE but thousands of images on Brovira. It was a fine paper. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean-David Beyer" wrote in message
... [...] grades 4, 5, and 6 were quite beautiful, IMAO. Grade 6 was darned near litho-like. I don't think I ever had a negative that has to be printed on 6. I also liked New Oriental Seagull, Ilford Galerie (until it got hard to get), and my favorite was Kodak Elite Fine Art (until they discontinued it). This is getting depressing. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I didn't like Brovira when I first tried it because I didn't know about
the difference in grades from other papers. So, printing on a #2, I was not getting the results I liked. Then I learned that I really needed a #3 to get a "normal" contrast, and I liked it just fine. Currently, MCC 111, while it is somewhat "warmer" in tone than Brovira, does continue the tradition of giving very good shadow detail and contrast. Which is why it is my standard paper. Jean-David Beyer wrote: wrote: Why? That stuff was crap. That is going too far, and useless without reasons. I liked the harder grades of Brovira very much. Remember their grades were all about a grade softer than from other manufacturers, so their grade 3 or grade 4 was about the same as other companies grade 2. The lowest grades were too soft for any of my negatives, but grades 4, 5, and 6 were quite beautiful, IMAO. They seemed a little bluer than Kodak's papers at the time. Of course you could get Kodak's paper to look something like that with benzotriazole in the developer. But it was best to make your negatives to match the paper you were using. I quit using it when it got hard to get. I also liked New Oriental Seagull, Ilford Galerie (until it got hard to get), and my favorite was Kodak Elite Fine Art (until they discontinued it). |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Agfa to depart from photography? (one more rumor from Old Continent) | ThomasH | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | August 23rd 04 11:23 PM |
agfa fast film patents AGFA mgmt buys film division | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 0 | August 23rd 04 02:14 AM | |
Question on Polaroid 35mm Film Made by Agfa | eb | Film & Labs | 2 | August 3rd 04 11:02 PM |
macro or close up filters? | Joseph Meehan | Digital Photography | 11 | July 22nd 04 07:42 PM |
Bronica ETRSi close ups | jeff worsnop | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 2 | May 3rd 04 10:53 AM |