You World Trade Center conspiracy idiots need to READ THIS

Starkiller© wrote:

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:55:28 -0400, * US * wrote:



What an idiot. Gets his ass kicked on the same issue in the political
groups so he has to start trolling Sci Fi and other unrelated groups
to get a rise. Pathetic little girl.


Naaah, he's getting his little ass kicked by a PO-wet.
Than which nothing in the universe is more Pathetique.

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon.
http://scrawlmark.org

* US * wrote:

On 20 Apr 2007 11:43:14 -0700, On The Highways and Bi-Ways God Built
wrote:


...beans ...


You're full of them.

What excuse do you tell yourself Bush would've
had for lying about 9/11?

Or can't you think even that far?

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:45:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:


...the structural steel turned to mush...


My, but you're gullible.


My, but I've ****ed you off /real/ good for you to use me in a sigblock.
Why, if your robot repeats it to you often enough, you might
actually have your Very Own Personal Chance To Believe.

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon.
http://scrawlmark.org

* US * wrote:



You really wanna study "Will Dockery" for the art of post-editing.
(ggamble will only make you cry some more.)

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon.
http://scrawlmark.org

* US * wrote:

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 05:08:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:


... this HUGE
GIGANTIC conspiracy is finally get out ...


Is English not your first language?


It's certainly not your second.
Poor thing, I didn't write that which you try to pretend I did.

--
-------(m+
~/)_|
I do not "negotiate" for half my baby back, Solomon.
http://scrawlmark.org

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:41:20 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:
..
The floors were deep cantilever and supported the core, not the
converse.

Why would anyone believe that?

You have absolutely no reason to believe that the
floors supported the core.

It was the other way around.

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:43:06 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

It was hit by a guy in an airplane

But Rumsfeld said it was a missile.

... sucking ...

If you could stop doing that for the fascists
it'd serve your own best interests far better.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:07:29 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

.... a little too
obvious...

Yet you don't get it that the Pentagon wasn't
really hit by a guy in a cave in Afghanistan.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:45:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

...the structural steel turned to mush...

My, but you're gullible.

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:52:46 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

... if I do.

If you ever do start thinking, let us know.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:48:12 -0700, Bill Funk wrote:

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:01:43 -0400, * US * wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:45:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

...the structural steel turned to mush...

My, but you're gullible.

Yeah, he probably believes ...

Why do you believe myths?

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:35:34 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

There's "no evidence" ...

You have no evidence to support your unfounded beliefs.

If you could do arithmetic, you could calculate that the
amount of jet fuel couldn't have heated the steel to the
weakening point at all.

Never saw a kerosene heater, either, did you.

cocksucking mouth ...

So that's why you've been unable to take time
to question the questionable.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 03:53:39 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

* US * wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:45:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:
...the structural steel turned to mush...

My, but you're gullible.

Naaah, I can do the math is all. ...

You have no 'math'. The mass of the steel serves
as a heat sink. There's no evidence that there were
at any time enough heat present from the aircraft
fires to weaken the steel.

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:38:49 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

... mush...

What a shame your brain got that way.

Otherwise you'd avoid being duped.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:03:38 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

P.S.: "Gullible" means that I believed somebody else told me.

Bush lied to you.

He did it in English, though, so you may have missed that, too.

...didn't learn a goddamned thing from "9/11."...

You can't even figure out what really happened that day.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 01:45:40 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

...the structural steel turned to mush...

My, but you're gullible.

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:56:15 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

... little ass kicked ...

Don't whine: you should be used to that happening
to you by now.

Bush and Cheney have terrorized you into showing
belly and giving up your rights.

If only you didn't hate America ...

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 09:31:26 -0500, Smearswiller© wrote:

What an idiot ...

You must be, to be duped by such as Bush.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:47:32 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

... another illiterate socialist.

That must be why you serve Trotskyites
and want everyone else to have to pay
for the crimes you support.

Why do you believe Bush?

****-for-brains

That's your best excuse, and your posts
confirm it. I say go with it.

... don't intend to survive ...

Nobody gets out of this alive.

History will view your mindless support of
the bush death kult no more kindly than it
does that of the 'good german' of the days
when the Bush family hero Hitler prevailed.

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:57:25 -0500, "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:

... screeching to be told where to
line up to surrender ...

You want to roll over for the fascists, no less.