If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! Doug McDonald |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 12/2/2010 9:34 AM, Doug McDonald wrote:
On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! The United States is not a democracy. It is a republic. In the situation the duck mentioned, I understand him to be lamenting that there are broad based black or white rules, with no room for discretion. Indeed. In the classic example of two men who steal from a sto The first is unemployed through to no fault of his own. He steals some food to feed his family. The second steals because he doesn't even try to find work and that is how he makes his living. IMHO the two should receive different treatment. Under the rules the duck cited, there is no room for discretion. The two receive equal treatment, -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 2010-12-02 07:31:33 -0800, peter said:
On 12/2/2010 9:34 AM, Doug McDonald wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! The United States is not a democracy. It is a republic. In the situation the duck mentioned, I understand him to be lamenting that there are broad based black or white rules, with no room for discretion. Indeed. In the classic example of two men who steal from a sto The first is unemployed through to no fault of his own. He steals some food to feed his family. The second steals because he doesn't even try to find work and that is how he makes his living. IMHO the two should receive different treatment. Under the rules the duck cited, there is no room for discretion. The two receive equal treatment, Correct, if both are found guilty as the result of a trial jury, or bench, the judge is constrained by sentencing guidelines. Those guidelines can be the terms as proscribed in the State Penal Code with various enhancements. There is a shopping list of enhancements such as minimums for the use of a firearm ( for example, rob a store using a knife, or indicating you might be carrying a gun, the sentence might be 2-4 years. Brandish a firearm and you are looking at 8-12 years, fire the weapon and you are going to deal with 15 years.) The "Three Strikes" Law simply works like this. A first violent felony conviction is sentenced according to the Penal Code proscription for the crime. So that firearm brandishing robber might be looking at 8 years. He will get credit for time served in County jail, and if he programs or works while in State prison he can get "day for day" credit, and he can be back on the street in about 5 years and be on parole for 3 years. If after he is released he goes and commits the exact same crime, and is convicted his sentence is doubled to 16 years and he has to serve 85% of the term. A third felony of any type will have him facing 25-life with parole only possible after 25 years. The big difference can come in a plea bargain negotiation, in which the judge plays no part. The plea agreement would adjust the charges for which a guilty plea is accepted, and waive priors and other exacerbating factors. That would allow the judge discretion to sentence to a more lenient sentence. With the current state of the California budget at state and county levels the County District Attorney's Offices are being encouraged to consider looking for a plea bargain as a method of reducing Court costs to the counties. Of the two types of individuals you described, I can relate one of my first, fairly naive encounters as an investigator, with an individual who was a downright charming thief. He would waffle on about the social life he enjoyed, the expensive restaurants he frequented, the fine clothing he wore, and the beautiful women he kept. He was facing about 6 years in State prison (before 3 strikes) and had many prior convictions. I asked him, why as an obviously intelligent individual, with fine taste, he didn't get an education, or learn a trade which would support the lifestyle he enjoyed. He looked at me as if I was crazy and said, " I don't program. I'm a thief. That is what I know." I consider him one of the most dangerous individuals I have ever met, and I have known some very violent men. He would go out on a dinner date, and rob a Seven-Eleven on the way to the restaurant, because that was the way he did things, and he wasn't going to let anybody spoil his night out. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
"peter" wrote in message
... On 12/2/2010 9:34 AM, Doug McDonald wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! The United States is not a democracy. It is a republic. In the situation the duck mentioned, I understand him to be lamenting that there are broad based black or white rules, with no room for discretion. Indeed. In the classic example of two men who steal from a sto The first is unemployed through to no fault of his own. He steals some food to feed his family. The second steals because he doesn't even try to find work and that is how he makes his living. IMHO the two should receive different treatment. Under the rules the duck cited, there is no room for discretion. The two receive equal treatment, Correct. We are a representative republic. However, a balanced use of propositions is something of value, IMO. As I stated in onather post, if our representatives legislate against our will, why not use proposition? I wish we had the ability to initiate a recall of our elected officials in NY like they do in California also. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 10-12-02 9:34 , Doug McDonald wrote:
On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Democracy can be debilitating when every "popular" proposition passes without a corresponding, direct on the ballot tax increase to fund it. This is California's democracy story: "I herewith vote for this law because I want it. But, I don't want to pay for it." -- gmail originated posts filtered due to spam. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 2010-12-02 13:35:07 -0800, Alan Browne
said: On 10-12-02 9:34 , Doug McDonald wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Democracy can be debilitating when every "popular" proposition passes without a corresponding, direct on the ballot tax increase to fund it. This is California's democracy story: "I herewith vote for this law because I want it. But, I don't want to pay for it." This is a major part of the california budget problem. The voter mandated spending has mostly been covered with bond sales. Now servicing the bonds is a major budget consideration. The tax revenues are down, so the options are, cutting services, which Arnie has done, increases in fees and taxes, which has been done to some extent, and yet the end of the tunnel is still blocked with not even a flicker of light showing. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010120209053443042-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-12-02 07:31:33 -0800, peter said: On 12/2/2010 9:34 AM, Doug McDonald wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! The United States is not a democracy. It is a republic. In the situation the duck mentioned, I understand him to be lamenting that there are broad based black or white rules, with no room for discretion. Indeed. In the classic example of two men who steal from a sto The first is unemployed through to no fault of his own. He steals some food to feed his family. The second steals because he doesn't even try to find work and that is how he makes his living. IMHO the two should receive different treatment. Under the rules the duck cited, there is no room for discretion. The two receive equal treatment, Correct, if both are found guilty as the result of a trial jury, or bench, the judge is constrained by sentencing guidelines. Those guidelines can be the terms as proscribed in the State Penal Code with various enhancements. There is a shopping list of enhancements such as minimums for the use of a firearm ( for example, rob a store using a knife, or indicating you might be carrying a gun, the sentence might be 2-4 years. Brandish a firearm and you are looking at 8-12 years, fire the weapon and you are going to deal with 15 years.) Just curious, what if the gun is a fake, say an Airsoft pistol (most of which are excellent models of the real thing) or even a water pistol? Some years ago I went through a citizens' education course at the local police department. At one point they passed around a water pistol which had been spray painted matte black, apparently with the intention of using it for robbery. The water pistol was a perfect model of a Beretta Model 86. I have no idea (and at that time didn't think to ask) what my state's sentencing would be in connection with the use of such a fake in robbery, as opposed to a real firearm. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The de-liberalization of photography
On 2010-12-03 11:13:17 -0800, "Neil Harrington" said:
"Savageduck" wrote in message news:2010120209053443042-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom... On 2010-12-02 07:31:33 -0800, peter said: On 12/2/2010 9:34 AM, Doug McDonald wrote: On 12/1/2010 7:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: Unfortunately much of what happens in California is proposition driven, so the Legislature and Judges have their hands tied by the voters. In other words: You are calling democracy "unfortunate"! Wow! The United States is not a democracy. It is a republic. In the situation the duck mentioned, I understand him to be lamenting that there are broad based black or white rules, with no room for discretion. Indeed. In the classic example of two men who steal from a sto The first is unemployed through to no fault of his own. He steals some food to feed his family. The second steals because he doesn't even try to find work and that is how he makes his living. IMHO the two should receive different treatment. Under the rules the duck cited, there is no room for discretion. The two receive equal treatment, Correct, if both are found guilty as the result of a trial jury, or bench, the judge is constrained by sentencing guidelines. Those guidelines can be the terms as proscribed in the State Penal Code with various enhancements. There is a shopping list of enhancements such as minimums for the use of a firearm ( for example, rob a store using a knife, or indicating you might be carrying a gun, the sentence might be 2-4 years. Brandish a firearm and you are looking at 8-12 years, fire the weapon and you are going to deal with 15 years.) Just curious, what if the gun is a fake, say an Airsoft pistol (most of which are excellent models of the real thing) or even a water pistol? Some years ago I went through a citizens' education course at the local police department. At one point they passed around a water pistol which had been spray painted matte black, apparently with the intention of using it for robbery. The water pistol was a perfect model of a Beretta Model 86. I have no idea (and at that time didn't think to ask) what my state's sentencing would be in connection with the use of such a fake in robbery, as opposed to a real firearm. The California Penal Code addresses this issue. I just happened to have my copy handy. PC 417 deals with all the different issues around drawing and exhibiting (showing), or threatening with a firearm, not actually shooting it. For imitation firearms this is more specific; PC 417.4 Imitation firearm; drawing or exhibiting: punishment; exceptions Every person who, except in self-defense, draws or exhibits an imitation firearm in a threatening manner agaisnt another in such a way as to cause a reasonable person apprehension or fear of bodily harm is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprsonment in a county jail for a term of not less than 30 days. For the purposes of this section, an imitation firearm means a replica of a firearm that is so substantially similar in physical properties to an existing firearm as to lead a reasonable person to conclude that the replica is a firearm. Now combine any of PC 417 with another crime such as a robbery and that opens up another set of issues. There intent comes into play, and that intent can include implied threat and the perception of that threat by a victim. So a robbbery committed with a fake or a real firearm, because of the implied threat has an equal weight in court. If it turns out to be a real firearm and it is fired everything moves up the scale. -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The de-liberalization of photography | GMAN[_12_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 163 | December 11th 10 06:39 PM |
The de-liberalization of photography | tony cooper | Digital Photography | 19 | December 2nd 10 09:47 PM |
The de-liberalization of photography | Stuffed Crust[_2_] | Digital Photography | 0 | December 2nd 10 02:08 PM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books - PHOTOGRAPHY - Photography Children - Existing Light - Kodak - Etc | Brad | Darkroom Equipment For Sale | 1 | June 15th 05 03:28 AM |