A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

35mm on grade 3 explained



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 10th 04, 08:10 PM
Michael Scarpitti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 35mm on grade 3 explained

I have often stated that 35mm film should be developed to print on
(about) grade 3 rather than grade 2.

Here is the explanation, from Kodak, in 'Kodak Films for
Black-and-White Photography', 1960.:

"....a low gradient in the negative material and a correspondingly
high gradient in the paper is more favorable than the alternative
combination."


Here's the context:

"Graininess.
When a negative is viewed at a sufficiently high magnification, it is
seen to possess a grainy or granular structure. This impression of
non-uniformity in the image is called graininess. It is caused by the
irregular distribution of the silver grains, rather than by the
individual grains themselves which are visible only under
magnifications much greater than are used in making ordinary
enlargements.

For emulsions of a given general type, graininess tends to increase
with the emulsion speed. When development is carried to the same
gradient, the common developers of normal and high activity (e.g.,
Kodak Developers DK-50, D-72, and Dektol) produce approximately equal
graininess with a given film. Some fine-grain developers (e.g., Kodak
Developers DK-20 and Microdol) produce noticeably less graininess but
at the expense of some loss of speed.
Graininess of the print increases with the density of the negative,
..so overexposure or overdevelopment of the latter should be avoided.

The graininess of both negatives and prints increases with increasing
gradient of the material on which they are made. When the gradient of
the negative material is low, prints are normally made on a paper
which has a high gradient and vice versa, so what may be gained by
holding one gradient down would be largely lost by the high gradient
of the other. It is usually true, however, that a low gradient in the
negative material and a correspondingly high gradient in the paper is
more favorable than the alternative combination.

The graininess reproduced in the print is most apparent in the lighter
middle tones, especially in large, uniform areas.

It is possible to conceal graininess somewhat by softening the focus
in enlarging, or by using a paper with a rough surface, but only at
some sacrifice in sharpness."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 30 September 12th 04 04:46 AM
Removing 35mm mask on Durst M606? Luigi de Guzman In The Darkroom 4 March 1st 04 04:09 AM
split grade printing - can it be done with only G5 +G0 filters? Jules Flynn In The Darkroom 3 February 7th 04 04:46 AM
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner bleanne APS Photographic Equipment 1 November 27th 03 07:34 AM
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner bleanne Other Photographic Equipment 1 November 27th 03 07:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.