If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Beauregard T. Shagnasty's Playpen.
"David B."
Sun, 28 May 2017 20:31:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 28/05/2017 18:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty has a web site, he- https://tekrider.net/pages/index.php (I'll post a screenshot if folk don't wish to click on a 'live' link) There you go again, dragging innocent and uninterested people into your world of STALKING. BTW, I would click on a live link long before I would ever consider clicking on your dropbox screenshots (where you track who visited). Here's the screenshot of your site:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/os3b2szqzg...3Atekrider.net %3A%20%20%2028%20May%202017.tiff?dl=0 [SNIP untruths that you posted.] I posted *NO* untruths! Why do you *LIE*, BTS? It didn't take you very long at all to go from 'I'm sorry, please down the site' to attacking. Just as I suspected. You will not be receiving any emails from me. Perhaps that was just too much to ask for. shrug Why should I give you more STALKING information? You are not straight-forward and honest. I must have been crazy to put my trust in you - at a time when I thought that you, too, cared about people. ROFL! There you go again, since the apology didn't have the desired result, you're opting for plan B. Attack! (This post being shared with good and honest folk at 're.photo.digital') My apologies for the crossposting STALKER involving people at r.p.d. -- you can be assured he himself will not do so, with any sincerity. It's not in his nature at all. Everything posted on my LinkedIn page is the absolute truth. Unlike YOU, I have nothing at all to hide. What does your linkedin page have to do with this thread you created? And, besides, you've modified the page several times, when lies of yours are pointed out to you. As far as you not hiding anything, that's not true either. You've yet to come clean with them and tell them why you're desperately seeking their help to deal with me. It has NOTHING whatsoever to do with copyright infringement. That's your 'ruse' to justify your stalking of me and get their help. It's an old one, but, you still try it. It's a personal vendetta you have with me, because I did to you, what you tried doing to me. And you tried it because I wouldn't accept your job offer; that was, to hack into two web forums and provide you details on the user databases. Prior, I had done NOTHING nefarious to you, I didn't even know you until you emailed me that day. Your continued stalking is the thanks I get for answering your first email and trying to help you succesfully run my program. As well as answering various questions that had nothing to do with my program. See what honesty can get you, readers of rec.photo.digital? A scumbag stalker who won't leave you alone. -- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order against me. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Beauregard T. Shagnasty's Playpen.
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
news alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [rec.photo.digital removed; it's just more stalking] Re-inserted, Sorry, but this reply must go with the thread he originated. [SNIP untruths that you posted.] I posted *NO* untruths! Why do you *LIE*, BTS? Yes, you did. 1] You are NOT a "good guy" and everyone else knows this. 2] You do NOT regret "some things" you did. 3] You had NOTHING to do with anything at Aumha or Annexcafe, other than being banned for your incessant bad behaviour and stalking. Not everyone, sadly. He was able to dupe several people from rec.photo.digital; which is why I'm ensuring my reply as well as yours is sent there. That and it keeps the thread as close to proper sync as I can from here. He doesn't regret a single thing he's said or done, in years. He's incapable of regret, he's completely okay with the things he's written and the actions he's taken against others, and, their materials. He'll continue to do it, too. The apology he wrote you was an attempt to blow smoke up your ass, and get you to delete the site. He forgot it existed, until someone from rec.photo.digital asked for proof of my claims concerning him being a stalker, and, wouldn't read the email between us to confirm it. And, hoping someone in rec.photo.digital would take pity on him for the site you have that exposes him for what he is. Your site summarized what he is, many of the nyms he's used to do it, and did so in far less lines that the email correspondence between us would. Some of the posters to rec.photo.digital commented they wouldn't touch the .zip file I have on my bughunter domain, but, they claimed to have visited your site when I shared the link. David is in damage control mode now. That's all. You are not straight-forward and honest. Everyone else will realize that I am both straight-forward and to the point, with honest details about you. Indeed, you are. Everything posted on my LinkedIn page is the absolute truth. Unlike YOU, I have nothing at all to hide. I wouldn't know, having never visited it. But I can imagine what it says. Why do you even HAVE a LinkedIn page -- you haven't had a JOB in eons. Well, I have visited it, several times. He's edited the contents, several times when myself or another questions something he wrote on it. IE: When he's caught LYING on it. I like what Paul told you a bit ago in the other group. Why do you keep digging your hole deeper? It's not within his nature to stop. Now I think I'm going to ignore you and your STALKING posts. Have a good one! It was nice to see you posting again, despite the fact Brooks forced you to have to make a comment in defense of yourself when it wasn't necessary. You're a reliable, honest, respectable individual and he only wishes he could be the same. -- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order against me. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Beauregard T. Shagnasty's Playpen.
"David B."
Sun, 28 May 2017 23:00:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 28/05/2017 22:59, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: [rec.photo.digital removed; it's just more stalking] David B. stalked: On 28/05/2017 18:31, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David B. wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty has a web site, he- (I'll post a screenshot if folk don't wish to click on a 'live' link) There you go again, dragging innocent and uninterested people into your world of STALKING. BTW, I would click on a live link long before I would ever consider clicking on your dropbox screenshots (where you track who visited). Here's the screenshot of your site:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/os3b2szqzg...A%3Atekrider.n et%3A%20%20%2028%20May%202017.tiff?dl=0 I know what my site looks like. There is no need whatsoever for you to post images of it. But I can if I wish! :-) Of course, David. You have no problems violating anothers copyrights or ignoring their requests concerning them. Instead, you'd much rather see them issue official DMCA notices and force their material off the site you hosted it on without their permission. That's the 'nice' guy you are. A decent guy wouldn't knowingly do it in the first place, and, if the material was being provided without permission and the owner contacted them or told them before hand NOT to host it elsewhere, they would honor that and not force the owner to file actual complaints. We all know that's not how you roll though. You happily take copies of things that don't belong to you, post them elsewhere, and taunt the owner into trying to have it removed. Again, I remind the rec.photo.digital audience how quickly you went from 'apology' to doing what you're well known for when you didn't get your way. Did you know that your actually in violation of your ISPs terms of service? You aren't supposed to knowingly take things you don't own and post them elsewhere. They frown upon it. I was browsing around your isp website earlier in the day, reading the terms of usage agreement you have with them. You've been breaching various parts of it for a long time now. Perhaps instead of trying to be reasonable with you in so far as other peoples materials, they should issue formal complaints with your ISP instead? http://www.bt.com/static/i/btretail/...acceptableuse/ A few highlights: You must not infringe the rights of others, including the right of privacy and copyright (an example would be sharing without permission of the copyright owner protected material such as a music or video file). You must not blatantly disregard the intended subject matter in a newsgroup by making off topic postings with apparent malicious intent or in large volumes. You must not maliciously try to incite other newsgroup users to deviate from the stated topic of the group. Attempts to anger others and to draw them into off topic debates are known as "trolling". So you see, David, when you posted my video to youtube as well as storing it on your dropbox account, you're not only in violation of my copyright to it, you're also violating your ISP terms of use agreement; which can result in the cancellation of your account. Don't assume that your ISP isn't logging your activities and can't link you to logging into youtube and your dropbox account. Your ISP is log heavy. Your site misleads people regarding the number of visitors. That's a FACT! That's simply a diversion by you. You aren't happy with the truthful material on the site that tells anyone who visits about you and soundly recommends they share nothing of a personal nature with you. I posted *NO* untruths! Why do you *LIE*, BTS? Yes, you did. 1] You are NOT a "good guy" and everyone else knows this. 2] You do NOT regret "some things" you did. 3] You had NOTHING to do with anything at Aumha or Annexcafe, other than being banned for your incessant bad behaviour and stalking. You are wrong, bts. No, he isn't. You continue to demonstrate how correct he is, actually. Everyone else will realize that I am both straight-forward and to the point, with honest details about you. You are frightened of your own shadow .... AND you are dishonest. You are a very sad individual; I pity you. It's amazing how quickly you tried and failed to blow smoke up his ass with your fake apology, to attacking him and poorly attempting to discredit the contents of his site as you do so. Which is exactly, hah, what I wrote that you'd resort to. Yep Yep. I know you well, David. Everything posted on my LinkedIn page is the absolute truth. Unlike YOU, I have nothing at all to hide. I wouldn't know, having never visited it. But I can imagine what it says. No, you can't. Do I sense frustration in you, David? How many times have you revised the linkedin description of you? More than once, right, David? And why did you revise it? Because several of us, visited your page and questioned some of the claims you had on it. Claims as in, what you claimed to be and do. Btw, David, the usenet server we tend to use, doesn't use encryption between us and our ISPs or other contact points as is my case. So, it wouldn't be difficult for your ISP to link you to various usenet posts of you doing shady ****, either. Food for thought. Personally, if I were to contact your ISP, it would be as a last resort. But, the same cannot be said of others you do things to, they might not want to go other routes when your isp is but an email away. Why do you even HAVE a LinkedIn page -- you haven't had a JOB in eons. So that I can keep an eye on people I trained and with whom I worked ....and monitor folk like Frank Podgwaite. Is monitor a new word for stalk? I like what Paul told you a bit ago in the other group. Why do you keep digging your hole deeper? Now I think I'm going to ignore you and your STALKING posts. Before you go, just explain *WHY* you were monitoring the 'alt.computer.workshop' group. Had you not been so doing, you'd never have seen my post here this morning, now would you? Why are you completely evading his question, David? You don't really have to answer me, It's a rhetorical question. I know exactly why you didn't respond to it. BFG Why did you contact him via his contact page, David? Another rhetorical question. I know why, already. I reminded you of the pages existance when I offered it's url as further proof of the scumbag stalker you are in rec.photo.digital. You're in damage control mode. I wonder how many of them are slow enough not to catch onto this? They don't need to trust me, David. You're doing a marvelous job of proving that what I wrote about you, as well as my initial reason for being in that newsgroup, quite nicely, without my help. I wonder if by your actions, I'm actually earning a little trust by some now? Wouldn't that be ironic. -- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order against me. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Beauregard T. Shagnasty's Playpen.
"David B."
Mon, 29 May 2017 08:10:56 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 29/05/2017 01:07, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: David Brooks the Stalker wrote: On 28/05/2017 22:59, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Now I think I'm going to ignore you and your STALKING posts. Your site misleads people regarding the number of visitors. That's a FACT! ROFL!! I told you years ago when you claimed that same thing.. that you can't take a JOKE! [the rest of the lies and innuendos snipped] Before you go, just explain *WHY* you were monitoring the 'alt.computer.workshop' group. Had you not been so doing, you'd never have seen my post here this morning, now would you? I don't visit Usenet every day -- unlike you, I *do* have a real life -- but I've been reading this group since you first claimed it was "your group." Why? Because you are the single most untrustworthy person on the Internet. You keep proving the truth of that statement with every post you make. Untrustworthy? Haha! :-D You've just GOT to be joking! I don't think so. I don't take kindly to folk like you playing games with me, that's for sure. Why do you need to hide and communicate using forms like this? Many sites use contact forms these days David... I'll study here later today ....... http://whois.domaintools.com/tekrider.net No doubt you'll be asking for help to explain what it is you're reading. And, again, I'll remind you, you're going against your ISP terms of use agreement. You aren't supposed to use BT's services for the purposes of intimidation, harassment, or stalking. BTS should *report* you for it, if you want my opinion. I'm wondering why there's a need to hide. You should give credit where credit is due. You should honor those of us who taught you how to do that, since prior to several of us using it on a website you used to run, you had no idea. Had you known about proxy registration, I've little doubt you would have used it yourself. One of it's purposes is to try and reduce online stalkers from obtaining personal information on another individual. So, no, it's not hiding, and has nothing to do with 'hiding'; it's a simple security precaution because the internet, despite your gross ignorance concerning it, is very much like the wild west. People like you exist in all sorts of places, and, as with them, you pose a danger to others, intentionally. Care to explain? You may be explaining your activities to your ISP sooner than you think. I do hope it goes better for you than it did with youtube. -- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order against me. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Beauregard T. Shagnasty's Playpen.
"David B."
Sun, 28 May 2017 15:49:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty has a web site, he- https://tekrider.net/pages/index.php That he does. For anyone wondering, THIS is what I said:- Hello, I'd like to politely request - yet again - that you remove the item on your web site which refers to me being what YOU call a 'stalker'. You *are* a stalker. MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603382000 From the Internet:- https://www.dropbox.com/s/1aywsna4x4...nfo..tiff?dl=0 Can YOU verify the information? MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149456200100 Do, please, read the WHOLE thread started by Mr Cook - called "Wanna torrent? " - on the 'alt.computer.workshop' group. Just *HOW* can I 'hang him out to dry'? (if you catch my drift!) Not only are you a confirmed, stalker, you try to solicit the help of others to assist you in doing it! Nothing on his site concerning you is untrue, David. Not a single word. Whilst you may not believe it, I really *AM* one of life's 'good guys' and have been endeavouring to discover instances on the Internet where things simply do not 'ring true'. I accept that in so doing I have said and done some things which I now regret. Which things do you regret having said and done, specifically? You've written so many ... inflammatory (to say the least) things, it's hard to know which ones you're fake apologizing for. I call it a fake apology, because, well, you'll go right back to doing the same old things, even if he should remove the offensive (to you) url. I'm almost certain you aren't apologizing for the above urls, Right? Further, I don't believe for a second your apology is real in the least little bit. You're trying to get him to remove the site exposing you for what you are, and, if he doesn't do so, I fully anticipate you'll attempt to discredit him in some manner. I doubt I'll have to wait very long to see you change tactics, either. I do hope those in rec.photo.digital see how this plays out. And learn that much more about what you're really like. And, it's even better for me as you willingly! help prove that what I wrote about you there is as you like to say, 'spot on' - Hope they enjoy dining on crow, too. I believe that it has been through my personal efforts that that the Annexcafe newsgroups have been shut down and so have the forums at Aumha.net. Perhaps YOU could explain to me how/why the hundreds of pages at www.aumha.org are still 'up and running'. Who pays for that .... and WHY? What personal efforts, David? You don't make an effort to do anything on your own. There you go again, trying to stalk! "Who pays for that .... and WHY?" What must I do to repair my relationship with you, BTS? Neither of us is getting any younger! At the very least, I'd welcome the courtesy of an email response from you. IMO, Your death would go a long ways towards making repairs. Not only towards myself, but, quite possibly BTS, and many! others you've stalked/harrassed throughout the years. As you wouldn't be able to stalk any more individuals, businesses, etc. Please, David, go join your son, as soon as possible! Your wife would quickly get over the loss, I've little doubt. As you wouldn't be able to abuse her anymore. Sincerely, bull****. Perhaps that was just too much to ask for. shrug You're lucky he even responded to you here, considering the things you are WELL KNOWN for having done to others. And besides, You demanded that he put the page up in the first place: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149603805600 If you have a single regret in your sorry miserable life, it's that post and nothing more. (This post being shared with good and honest folk at 're.photo.digital') Translation: The freshmeat (as in, your newest targets) group that thinks you're an okay guy and aren't out to do harm to anyone. They might figure you out, soon enough. I suspect atleast one poster to that newsgroup may have already, though: MID: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=149604166500 Ummm, you don't think you're pretty much confirming what he's had to say about you? -- Nope, I can't go to hell. Satan still has a restraining order against me. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Festival of flowers - Saint Jean de Beauregard - France | tom | Digital Photography | 2 | May 2nd 07 07:39 PM |