If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Bill Graham wrote:
Alan Browne wrote: On 2011.02.04 16:39 , dickr2 wrote: Bowser wrote: The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 Maybe it's just me, but I think some travel photos document places you've been, people, sites and other shots that can be placed in an album for reminiscing years from now. "Remember when you were standing on that corner in San Francisco?" The photo certainly isn't an artistic masterpiece, but it is a keepsake. Certainly. And that's all the shot was meant to be. But as a photo it's just horrible. Mid day. No fill flash. Backpack hanging on the hydrant. Clutter. Other tourist making same shot (backlit no less) on the edge of the frame. Ya-da-yada. Cliché of that famous corner now a part of a tourist magnet with the same damned kind of shops you find anywhere else in their tourist traps... (I was rushed. To frame the street signs on the sun side of the shot I was standing in the traffic flow of Ashbury ... I could practically hear the regulars: "Ah, cripes not another fricken tourist standing in the street again...".) I thought it was great. My wife lived two blocks from there for several years. (Cole and Carl Sts) I fowarded it to her. It reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
On 2011-02-04 16:54:42 -0800, Paul Furman said:
Bill Graham wrote: Alan Browne wrote: On 2011.02.04 16:39 , dickr2 wrote: Bowser wrote: The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 Maybe it's just me, but I think some travel photos document places you've been, people, sites and other shots that can be placed in an album for reminiscing years from now. "Remember when you were standing on that corner in San Francisco?" The photo certainly isn't an artistic masterpiece, but it is a keepsake. Certainly. And that's all the shot was meant to be. But as a photo it's just horrible. Mid day. No fill flash. Backpack hanging on the hydrant. Clutter. Other tourist making same shot (backlit no less) on the edge of the frame. Ya-da-yada. Cliché of that famous corner now a part of a tourist magnet with the same damned kind of shops you find anywhere else in their tourist traps... (I was rushed. To frame the street signs on the sun side of the shot I was standing in the traffic flow of Ashbury ... I could practically hear the regulars: "Ah, cripes not another fricken tourist standing in the street again...".) I thought it was great. My wife lived two blocks from there for several years. (Cole and Carl Sts) I fowarded it to her. It reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? That is an amusing thought. Back then Bill was developing his intense hatred of all things Californian; vehicle registration fees, State taxes, Cal formula gas, smoking restrictions, everything but his job at Stanford, and planning his escape to Oregon. Bill why is it that after you abandoned California for Oregon, you are nostalgic for old SF? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Paul Furman wrote:
Bill Graham wrote: Alan Browne wrote: On 2011.02.04 16:39 , dickr2 wrote: Bowser wrote: The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 Maybe it's just me, but I think some travel photos document places you've been, people, sites and other shots that can be placed in an album for reminiscing years from now. "Remember when you were standing on that corner in San Francisco?" The photo certainly isn't an artistic masterpiece, but it is a keepsake. Certainly. And that's all the shot was meant to be. But as a photo it's just horrible. Mid day. No fill flash. Backpack hanging on the hydrant. Clutter. Other tourist making same shot (backlit no less) on the edge of the frame. Ya-da-yada. Cliché of that famous corner now a part of a tourist magnet with the same damned kind of shops you find anywhere else in their tourist traps... (I was rushed. To frame the street signs on the sun side of the shot I was standing in the traffic flow of Ashbury ... I could practically hear the regulars: "Ah, cripes not another fricken tourist standing in the street again...".) I thought it was great. My wife lived two blocks from there for several years. (Cole and Carl Sts) I fowarded it to her. It reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? I wish....But then, He is dead. (screwing around with a helicopter in the fog) and I am still alive......So maybe its good that I never made enough money to play with helicopters. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Savageduck wrote:
On 2011-02-04 16:54:42 -0800, Paul Furman said: Bill Graham wrote: Alan Browne wrote: On 2011.02.04 16:39 , dickr2 wrote: Bowser wrote: The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 Maybe it's just me, but I think some travel photos document places you've been, people, sites and other shots that can be placed in an album for reminiscing years from now. "Remember when you were standing on that corner in San Francisco?" The photo certainly isn't an artistic masterpiece, but it is a keepsake. Certainly. And that's all the shot was meant to be. But as a photo it's just horrible. Mid day. No fill flash. Backpack hanging on the hydrant. Clutter. Other tourist making same shot (backlit no less) on the edge of the frame. Ya-da-yada. Cliché of that famous corner now a part of a tourist magnet with the same damned kind of shops you find anywhere else in their tourist traps... (I was rushed. To frame the street signs on the sun side of the shot I was standing in the traffic flow of Ashbury ... I could practically hear the regulars: "Ah, cripes not another fricken tourist standing in the street again...".) I thought it was great. My wife lived two blocks from there for several years. (Cole and Carl Sts) I fowarded it to her. It reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? That is an amusing thought. Back then Bill was developing his intense hatred of all things Californian; vehicle registration fees, State taxes, Cal formula gas, smoking restrictions, everything but his job at Stanford, and planning his escape to Oregon. Bill why is it that after you abandoned California for Oregon, you are nostalgic for old SF? You said it right there. The operative phrase is, "Old SF". They destroyed SF years ago when they replaced the old produce district with the Embarcadero Center, and playland at the beach with those stupid condos that nobody bought. Yes, I do have nostaglia for old SF. But then, I guess most everyonein my age bracket has nostaglia for old, 'someplace or other.' |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Bill Graham wrote:
Savageduck wrote: Paul Furman said: Bill Graham wrote: reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? That is an amusing thought. Back then Bill was developing his intense hatred of all things Californian; vehicle registration fees, State taxes, Cal formula gas, smoking restrictions, everything but his job at Stanford, and planning his escape to Oregon. Bill why is it that after you abandoned California for Oregon, you are nostalgic for old SF? You said it right there. The operative phrase is, "Old SF". They destroyed SF years ago when they replaced the old produce district with the Embarcadero Center, and playland at the beach with those stupid condos that nobody bought. Yes, I do have nostaglia for old SF. But then, I guess most everyonein my age bracket has nostaglia for old, 'someplace or other.' The Embarcadero is great since the freeway came down due to the 89 quake. I can't believe the waterfront was ringed by a double decker freeway before! You are probably talking about the Embarcadero Center though. The produce market is south of Potrero Hill now, it's just a big nasty industrial area for wholesale produce exchange but there are lots of farmer's markets across town. Lots of improvements in recent years, lots of good changes in the 23 years I've been here. The only real negative I suppose is gentrification/expenisive-ication. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:01:05 -0500, Bowser wrote:
The latest addition to Bad Travel: Maybe it's me, but most of the piccies on your page look fine to me. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Paul Furman wrote:
Bill Graham wrote: Savageduck wrote: Paul Furman said: Bill Graham wrote: reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? That is an amusing thought. Back then Bill was developing his intense hatred of all things Californian; vehicle registration fees, State taxes, Cal formula gas, smoking restrictions, everything but his job at Stanford, and planning his escape to Oregon. Bill why is it that after you abandoned California for Oregon, you are nostalgic for old SF? You said it right there. The operative phrase is, "Old SF". They destroyed SF years ago when they replaced the old produce district with the Embarcadero Center, and playland at the beach with those stupid condos that nobody bought. Yes, I do have nostaglia for old SF. But then, I guess most everyonein my age bracket has nostaglia for old, 'someplace or other.' The Embarcadero is great since the freeway came down due to the 89 quake. I can't believe the waterfront was ringed by a double decker freeway before! You are probably talking about the Embarcadero Center though. The produce market is south of Potrero Hill now, it's just a big nasty industrial area for wholesale produce exchange but there are lots of farmer's markets across town. Lots of improvements in recent years, lots of good changes in the 23 years I've been here. The only real negative I suppose is gentrification/expenisive-ication. Back in the old days, the produce district was where the Embarcadero Center buildings are now. It was a wonderful place, full of little bistros and bars and lawyers offices and little import-export houses manned by one or two people, and bookstores and the like. It was my wife and I's favorite playground. When they moved it to South City, the whole character of SF was changed forever, and not for the better. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
On 02/04/2011 03:01 PM, Bowser wrote:
The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 good memories I was there for two weeks in '68 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:57:54 -0800, Paul Furman
wrote: Bowser wrote: The latest addition to Bad Travel: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/132292512 Did she have particularly ugly shoes that you didn't want to show? evil grin I spent a week in San Francisco at the height of the, Flower Power, hippie, Haight-Ashbury is the place to be time. The thing I remember most about the girls I saw there was that their feet were dirty since most were either barefoot or wearing sandals. It wasn't just that day's dirt, either. Free love was in, but showers must have been out. I did pay a visit to the Poets Plaza and to City Lights bookstore. Never saw Ferlinghetti, though. Bought a copy of Ginsberg's "Howl" at the City Lights just because it seemed the right thing to buy from there. I still have it somewhere. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Yet another bad one
Bill Graham wrote:
Paul Furman wrote: Bill Graham wrote: Savageduck wrote: Paul Furman said: Bill Graham wrote: reminded us of the good old days in SF....... Back when you were producing rock concerts? That is an amusing thought. Back then Bill was developing his intense hatred of all things Californian; vehicle registration fees, State taxes, Cal formula gas, smoking restrictions, everything but his job at Stanford, and planning his escape to Oregon. Bill why is it that after you abandoned California for Oregon, you are nostalgic for old SF? You said it right there. The operative phrase is, "Old SF". They destroyed SF years ago when they replaced the old produce district with the Embarcadero Center, and playland at the beach http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playlan...n_Francisco%29 with those stupid condos that nobody bought. Hmm, yeah, that does look like a lame development: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sour...06035&t=h&z=18 Yes, I do have nostaglia for old SF. But then, I guess most everyone in my age bracket has nostaglia for old, 'someplace or other.' I found the little house where we lived till I was two in downtown Chicago, it's still there and looking great. I showed it to my 80-year old mother on google street view and she freaked out because it was 100 years old when they bought it and they basically saved it from demolition - it was already way too small and out of scale 47 years ago, what a treat that it's still around and well maintained: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=...226.59,,0,1.24 The Embarcadero is great since the freeway came down due to the 89 quake. I can't believe the waterfront was ringed by a double decker freeway before! You are probably talking about the Embarcadero Center though. The produce market is south of Potrero Hill now, it's just a big nasty industrial area for wholesale produce exchange but there are lots of farmer's markets across town. Lots of improvements in recent years, lots of good changes in the 23 years I've been here. The only real negative I suppose is gentrification/expenisive-ication. Back in the old days, the produce district was where the Embarcadero Center buildings are now. It was a wonderful place, full of little bistros and bars and lawyers offices and little import-export houses manned by one or two people, and bookstores and the like. It was my wife and I's favorite playground. When they moved it to South City, the whole character of SF was changed forever, and not for the better. There are still lots of small local owned shops and neighborhoods with their own character that evolve with time. The flower market is still functioning, tons of farmer's markets, etc. Most of the big nasty public housing projects have been replaced with mixed income condos more in scale with the urban fabric. Probably you remember before those housing projects, before the Embarcadero freeway, before Japantown flattened that whole area with a mall, but it's worked out OK, the Japantown mall is mostly small businesses, many of the small movie theaters are still operating, there's even a small independent film theater in the Embarcadero Center! I think the EC is cool, better than a lot of massive 60's/70's projects. That kind of downtown location just can't be used for little 1 story shops. Jackson Square is still intact, Chinatown, North Beach, basically the same rich fine textured urban fare. Back on topic about photos, here's a pic of the Embarcadero Center buildings: http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/3491922830/ -I like how they broke up the axial side of the three buildings into smaller scale slabs - better than most sky scrapers. http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgehill/2841355517/ -that park was freeway! More recently, the whole waterfront has been revamped for pedestrians: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=sund...7%40N08&page=3 -Sunday Streets, a new thing they are trying a few times each summer across town for bikes & kids to enjoy the best of town car-free. The Third Street corridor has a new light transit line from the new ballpark downtown past the new medical campus to Bayview, the old trolleys are runniing again up Market to Castro. Lots of new parks and miniparks, and parking spaces reclaimed for cafe tables. Nothing to lament really. Some things get destroyed but it's fun to watch it rebuild and evolve. The ramshackle 1880's cottage I lived in 6 years ago was up 4 dozen steps surrounded by vacant cliff lots 15 years ago and it's all built up now but it was well built and still interesting. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|