If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts?
Please let us know your thoughts on Sony's new DSC-W1 Digital Camera.
Good Points and Bad Points. Thinking of buying one. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts?
I own a Sony DSC-W1 since two weeks. Pictures look great and I have
started testing right now: 1. At the wide angle position of the zoom lens, there is a cushion-like distortion, which is irrelevant at usual pictures. For architecture you have to think about it. It is the price for the small lens. 2. The camera fits nicely into the pocket and operates fast. Almost not shutter release delay. 3. Extra low noise. 4. Very important for an everyday's snapshot camera is the possibility for spontaneous photographing. Normally, the accumulator is out of power. A pack of normal batteries are always around or can be bought. 5. The are manual settings possibilities, as speed, aperture, distance, sharpening, contrast and color saturation, which I often use. It is important for postprocessing that the sharpening can be reduced. It can be done far better by Photoshop. 6. Files are only in JPG. I'd liked a raw format in addition. JPG files are compressed at a ratio of 1:6 (fine). When you convert into TIFF at normal pictures, even specialists cannot tell if it was originally TIF or JPG. 7. I am not quite shure about focussing. There are only 5 positions (0.5 m, 1 m, 3 m, 7 m and infinity). My depth of field calculator tells me, that distances of 0.7 m or 1.8 m are not sharp??? My tests will be focussed on that in future. At the moment I could not agree to my calculator?? 8. Flash is powerful enough to take pictures from groups sitting around a table, which is not the case at the Sony T-1. All in all, the W-1 is a phantastic little camera, which minor draw backs. A small camera is always a compromise. This is a good one. I would buy it once more. AFH ############################################ unavailable schrieb: Please let us know your thoughts on Sony's new DSC-W1 Digital Camera. Good Points and Bad Points. Thinking of buying one. Thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts?
Please let us know your thoughts on Sony's new DSC-W1 Digital Camera.
Good Points and Bad Points. Thinking of buying one. Thanks. I just returned from a short trip to Las Vegas - my first chance to use my new Sony DSC-W1 extensively. The outdoor pictures were great at every distance. I took several aerial shots from the top of the Eiffel Tower and I thought they had very good detail for such a long distance. The colors were perfect. Running the photos through any automated color correction resulted in little or no change. I kept all of the settings at the default and full automatic. There are some manual settings you can change but I chose to test the point and shoot functionality at it's easiest. It is very quick from power on to first picture and from picture to picture. I didn't miss any shots at all. The indoor shots in the casinos were just a little dissappointing. The casinos are for the most part fairly dark and the flash was incapable of lighting up such large areas. In a living room it would be fine. I did not try to compensate at all but I think that might have helped. I also took several night shots of the strip and they were also just slightly dissappointing. Again, I did not compensate for the darkness but kept the default setting. I wish I had experimented some with the settings for night. In the very bright sun (101 degrees in the shade) the LCD was a little difficult to see. I probably should have turned up the brightness but did not want to affect battery life. The DSC-W1 uses NiMH AA batteries and they performed extremely well. I took about 189 photos over three days with LCD on all of the time and lots of zooming. The battery power icon showed no degradation until the 3rd night after reviewing all of the photos on the LCD. As far as pocketability, I wandered up and down the strip with the little W-1 in my pocket and it was barely noticeable but always ready at a moment's notice. This is only my second digital camera. My first was a Fuji 2600 (good in it's time) and what a tremendous difference. Originally I didn't even want to consider Sony because of the proprietary memory stick but I am glad I did. It stacks up well against any of the other currently available 5.1 mp cameras and at $100 less (MSRP) you can afford the memory stick. There is also the advantage of using AA NiMH batteries. A package of 4 2300mah NiMH batteries at Meijer's was only $9.99 and they lasted forever. I was very close to going with the Canon S500 (a fine camera) but decided the larger LCD (2.5") and other extras like scene modes made the Sony a better deal. The pictures may be just slightly less clear than the Canon but I believe I made the right choice. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony Cybershot DSC-W1... Bad Camera...Bad Customer Service bySony... Read on... | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 25 | June 29th 04 06:45 AM |
[Q:] Sony DSC-W1 Anybody use this camera yet? Any thoughts? | Bob Roetker | Digital Photography | 0 | June 28th 04 07:19 PM |
Sony digital camera and computer with no USB port | Dan Wojciechowski | Digital Photography | 0 | June 28th 04 03:08 PM |
Penny for your thoughts on this Travel/Hiking Camera System | Spencer Douglas | 35mm Photo Equipment | 6 | June 18th 04 07:55 AM |