To examples of Chinese quality

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal
works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese
manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out
equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20-
$50.

What are you talking about here ?

"RustY ©" wrote in message
...

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal
works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese
manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out
equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20-
$50.

What are you talking about here ?
"when it is probably designed"

Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. I guess
if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning!
;-)

Ron

On 12/14/09 5:45 AM, in article , "RustY
©" wrote:


"RichA" wrote in message
...
Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal
works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese
manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out
equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20-
$50.

What are you talking about here ?

You think he would know, 'two'?

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:51:08 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Dec 14, 8:44*am, "Ron Recer" wrote:
"RustY ©" wrote in message

...

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. *Metal
works well, when it is probably designed. *But some cheap Chinese
manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out
equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20-
$50.

What are you talking about here ?

"when it is probably designed"

Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. *I guess
if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning!
;-)

Ron

I know, English is a tough language for some. Properly means
correctly. Incorrectly, or improperly, means the product was designed
poorly (relying on worn out and s----- Chinese tooling) and the result
was failure.

I figured that was properly what you meant.

John A. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:51:08 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Dec 14, 8:44 am, "Ron Recer" wrote:
"RustY ©" wrote in message

...

"RichA" wrote in message
...
Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal
works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese
manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out
equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20-
$50.
What are you talking about here ?
"when it is probably designed"

Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. I guess
if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning!
;-)

Ron
I know, English is a tough language for some. Properly means
correctly. Incorrectly, or improperly, means the product was designed
poorly (relying on worn out and s----- Chinese tooling) and the result
was failure.

I figured that was properly what you meant.
I tried to get Google Earth to show me how to get "to" examples of
Chinese quality, but no luck.
Allen

"George Kerby" wrote in message
...

What are you talking about here ?

You think he would know, 'two'?


You mean 'You'd thimk he would know too' ?

On 12/15/09 1:49 PM, in article ,
"RustY ©" wrote:


"George Kerby" wrote in message
...

What are you talking about here ?

You think he would know, 'two'?


You mean 'You'd thimk he would know too' ?


No. Ewe'd thunk he wood no, to?