If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
. .. Bandicoot wrote: I agree, that would be a pain. But if you were to spend some money, would you be better trading them both in to get two 200Ws heads with infinite adjustment over three stops, or trade one in and spring for a 400Ws head with infinite adjustment over four stops? If you think about the possible combinations, I think the latter is better. I would get 5 stop infinite which is what AlienBees offer, AFAIK, on all their monos. This doesn't answer my point: if budget is tight, where is it best to direct those limited resources? Just saying what you want _if_ you could afford it isn't the issue. I would avoid a pack set for a small studio. Ditto - packs are good for high power, or inacessible heads, but you don't need them for lower power applications. That said, I have a 3000Ws pack with full asymmetry across three heads, and that is just as flexible as monolights. 2 AB 800's and a 400 (really 320 W-s and 160 W-s resp) would be ideal for a small portrait studio, supplemented with ac strobes as req'd. If, in my small studio, I was doing anything requiring both lots of difusion and greater DOF, then higher power would be required. (I rarely use anyhthing other than ISO 100 film in my little studio (Portra 160 being 100, of course)). So, having said that, just adding the 800 (320 W-s) to my two 200 W-s lights would be an improvment. But I'd rather replace those two as well with more controllable lights as well. One big problem I have with simple portraits is that my subject can't be much further than about 3-4 feet from the BG (room) when I use the 100mm. My 200 W-s light, set at seat level to light the BG, and at 1/2 power puts too much light on the BG (unless I want a 2 stop blowout). I've bought an AC-strobe (60 W-s) and put a sheet of white plastic over it, and I can now get the BG to -1 to +1 stop as required by moving the AC strobe in/out/up/down. The closer that main light is to the sitter, of course, the more fall off will reduce the relative brightness on the background - but then you need to be able to turn down (or gel) that main light to give you the stop you want for the subject. So this comes back to the general point I was making: having one really good light in this instance, with lots of control, plus the cheap and simple light on the background, helps you more than having two lights with 'some' control does. It's all about where you put the money. So you can see that more control of the individual lights, regardless of power, would be a big help. Of course lots of power and lots of adjustability is better - but if the budget is limited I think it makes most sense to think carefully and recognise that what matters is how much you can adjust the heads _relative to_ each other, rather than how much you can adjust every single one in isolation. Certainly. Ah, so we agree after all ;-) Peter |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan Browne" wrote in message
. .. Bandicoot wrote: I agree, that would be a pain. But if you were to spend some money, would you be better trading them both in to get two 200Ws heads with infinite adjustment over three stops, or trade one in and spring for a 400Ws head with infinite adjustment over four stops? If you think about the possible combinations, I think the latter is better. I would get 5 stop infinite which is what AlienBees offer, AFAIK, on all their monos. This doesn't answer my point: if budget is tight, where is it best to direct those limited resources? Just saying what you want _if_ you could afford it isn't the issue. I would avoid a pack set for a small studio. Ditto - packs are good for high power, or inacessible heads, but you don't need them for lower power applications. That said, I have a 3000Ws pack with full asymmetry across three heads, and that is just as flexible as monolights. 2 AB 800's and a 400 (really 320 W-s and 160 W-s resp) would be ideal for a small portrait studio, supplemented with ac strobes as req'd. If, in my small studio, I was doing anything requiring both lots of difusion and greater DOF, then higher power would be required. (I rarely use anyhthing other than ISO 100 film in my little studio (Portra 160 being 100, of course)). So, having said that, just adding the 800 (320 W-s) to my two 200 W-s lights would be an improvment. But I'd rather replace those two as well with more controllable lights as well. One big problem I have with simple portraits is that my subject can't be much further than about 3-4 feet from the BG (room) when I use the 100mm. My 200 W-s light, set at seat level to light the BG, and at 1/2 power puts too much light on the BG (unless I want a 2 stop blowout). I've bought an AC-strobe (60 W-s) and put a sheet of white plastic over it, and I can now get the BG to -1 to +1 stop as required by moving the AC strobe in/out/up/down. The closer that main light is to the sitter, of course, the more fall off will reduce the relative brightness on the background - but then you need to be able to turn down (or gel) that main light to give you the stop you want for the subject. So this comes back to the general point I was making: having one really good light in this instance, with lots of control, plus the cheap and simple light on the background, helps you more than having two lights with 'some' control does. It's all about where you put the money. So you can see that more control of the individual lights, regardless of power, would be a big help. Of course lots of power and lots of adjustability is better - but if the budget is limited I think it makes most sense to think carefully and recognise that what matters is how much you can adjust the heads _relative to_ each other, rather than how much you can adjust every single one in isolation. Certainly. Ah, so we agree after all ;-) Peter |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
I'm curious to learn if you've decided on anything yet.
I am looking to work with a very similar (garage) set-up and am curious to see what you decide after so many conflicting and, at points, incongruent opinions from this group. Do let us know. Thanks, xrx. me wrote: How many watt seconds do I need? I'm using a 35mm film camera. I'll be shooting in my single car basement/garage and a smallish living room. Ambient light from sun is dim, EV4 at 100 ISO for both. I'd like 3 lights, main, fill and hair/bg/kicker. I assume the main and fill should be the same w/s but how many w/s should the other light be? I'm trying to come up with a ratio like 1/2 or 1/4 as many w/s as main. I also want more than 3 power levels. I think this would be more versatile and may be a necessity since I don't have room to move lights further from the subject to reduce power. What do you think? I apologize if this question is vague but I have never purchased studio lights before. Thank you for your help. me |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
I'm curious to learn if you've decided on anything yet.
I am looking to work with a very similar (garage) set-up and am curious to see what you decide after so many conflicting and, at points, incongruent opinions from this group. Do let us know. Thanks, xrx. me wrote: How many watt seconds do I need? I'm using a 35mm film camera. I'll be shooting in my single car basement/garage and a smallish living room. Ambient light from sun is dim, EV4 at 100 ISO for both. I'd like 3 lights, main, fill and hair/bg/kicker. I assume the main and fill should be the same w/s but how many w/s should the other light be? I'm trying to come up with a ratio like 1/2 or 1/4 as many w/s as main. I also want more than 3 power levels. I think this would be more versatile and may be a necessity since I don't have room to move lights further from the subject to reduce power. What do you think? I apologize if this question is vague but I have never purchased studio lights before. Thank you for your help. me |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
I'm curious to learn if you've decided on anything yet.
I am looking to work with a very similar (garage) set-up and am curious to see what you decide after so many conflicting and, at points, incongruent opinions from this group. Do let us know. Thanks, xrx. me wrote: How many watt seconds do I need? I'm using a 35mm film camera. I'll be shooting in my single car basement/garage and a smallish living room. Ambient light from sun is dim, EV4 at 100 ISO for both. I'd like 3 lights, main, fill and hair/bg/kicker. I assume the main and fill should be the same w/s but how many w/s should the other light be? I'm trying to come up with a ratio like 1/2 or 1/4 as many w/s as main. I also want more than 3 power levels. I think this would be more versatile and may be a necessity since I don't have room to move lights further from the subject to reduce power. What do you think? I apologize if this question is vague but I have never purchased studio lights before. Thank you for your help. me |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
On 16/12/04 7:05 am, in article Bsawd.240977$HA.73338@attbi_s01, "xrx"
wrote: I'm curious to learn if you've decided on anything yet. I am looking to work with a very similar (garage) set-up and am curious to see what you decide after so many conflicting and, at points, incongruent opinions from this group. Do let us know. Thanks, xrx. He probably wished he never asked. ;] (I had to look "incongruent" up) |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
On 16/12/04 7:05 am, in article Bsawd.240977$HA.73338@attbi_s01, "xrx"
wrote: I'm curious to learn if you've decided on anything yet. I am looking to work with a very similar (garage) set-up and am curious to see what you decide after so many conflicting and, at points, incongruent opinions from this group. Do let us know. Thanks, xrx. He probably wished he never asked. ;] (I had to look "incongruent" up) |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Bandicoot wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message I would get 5 stop infinite which is what AlienBees offer, AFAIK, on all their monos. This doesn't answer my point: if budget is tight, where is it best to direct those limited resources? Just saying what you want _if_ you could afford it isn't the issue. The next time I discharge money into studio lights I will get what I want. Prior to that there are other lenses I want, possibly a 500CM and a couple lenses and backs. Maybe even a digital body. If I currently had a choice of two lower powered monos or one larger mono, it would be the larger mono, as this would give me more DOF control in the stuido with slower films, that I do agree with you... One big problem I have with simple portraits is that my subject can't be much further than about 3-4 feet from the BG (room) when I use the 100mm. My 200 W-s light, set at seat level to light the BG, and at 1/2 power puts too much light on the BG (unless I want a 2 stop blowout). I've bought an AC-strobe (60 W-s) and put a sheet of white plastic over it, and I can now get the BG to -1 to +1 stop as required by moving the AC strobe in/out/up/down. The closer that main light is to the sitter, of course, the more fall off will reduce the relative brightness on the background - but then you need to be able to turn down (or gel) that main light to give you the stop you want for the subject. So this comes back to the general point I was making: having one really good light in this instance, with lots of control, plus the cheap and simple light on the background, helps you more than having two lights with 'some' control does. It's all about where you put the money. I can't really agree that the BG lighting can be done easilly on the cheap. In a larger area studio it's easier to work with less contol in the lights. In a smaller studio there is less room to place things and adjust. Hence more control is desired on all the lights. (The counter side of what I said above is I have so little room for the BG light that lifting it 12 inches can change the lighting behind the subjects head by over a stop.) I need to be able to tune that back down. Current solution is a cheap AC strobe with layers of white plastic... but that is messy, tedious and I get less control of the shape of the BG light on the BG. (not having a modeleing light for it means a lot of guesswork in getting a pleasing shape out of it too). I currently make do with two 'real' studio lights (as 'junior' as they are), an AC stobe, an old sunpak and one or two Maxxum flashes in manual wired flash configuration, but it's very tedious on the setup. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How many watt seconds do I need? | me | 35mm Photo Equipment | 88 | December 20th 04 04:36 PM |
4921 seconds | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 11 | November 4th 04 04:57 AM |
CF cards speed comparisons | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 13 | October 7th 04 06:16 AM |
'Ultra' / 'High-Speed' SD cards VS. regular SD cards | Steven | Digital Photography | 7 | October 1st 04 03:04 PM |
Density Streaks on Film | Alparslan | In The Darkroom | 11 | March 29th 04 02:03 AM |