If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
Case in point, Exacta. A company that developed the earliest SLRs, great
build quality and Schneider optics, wide variety of lenses by other manufacturers, like Angeneaux, even film appearances ("Rear Window"). And can be had quite cheaply, under $100, sometimes more like $50 for one in great condition. -- Skip Middleton http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com "Matt Clara" wrote in message .. . "R.Schenck" wrote in message ... Sander Vesik on 03 Jul 2004 posted Mike Henley wrote: Do you anticipate they'll increase depreciate or increase in value in years to come? Why do you care? Will a bottle of red wine made in Bordeaux in 2004 cost $$ or $$$ or $$$$$ in year 2015? Would you buy it based on age or buy wine based on actual taste you want? as a completely off topic aside, there are infact wine auctions, where the wine is bought an sold as an investment item, irrespective of taste. I assume eventually someone drinks it tho. Here's the facts on camera appreciation. You would do better to invest the money in a bank than in a camera you hope to make cash on later. I don't know a single case where that isn't true. Cameras are for taking pictures with, not for investment. -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
Mike Henley wrote:
Do you anticipate they'll increase depreciate or increase in value in years to come? I think new mechanical cameras might increase in price in the future. This would be somewhat due to inflation, though also from limited production. The Nikon FM3A might continue to be produced for a few more years, though technically it could be considered an electronic camera. That leaves Leica, and maybe Contax to continue into the future with manual bodies, or at least manual focus. It's understandable that their prices have dropped significantly lately as everyone's been riding on the digital wave, but regarding the future... If you mean used, then it depends upon which cameras you look into. Many of the old SLRs are now becoming more collectors items. Of course, the collector market could change at any moment, or it could be that an ageing population of collectors is not replacement by a younger generation with the same interests. As for "classic" mostly manual cameras that an enthusiast could get used, then I think some areas might see prices fall a bit. The problem in that type of purchase, is that service costs will likely only continue to rise. To the old camera enthusiast, that might mean learning to do your own repairs. It could also mean buying similar non working cameras as a source for personal use spare parts. Possibility A) they could increase in value Rationale - less will be made Quite likely, and maybe only high end production. - those that will be made will either be one of two... A) modern, and those who like modern stuff will likely go digital. So, the more likely is B) retro, and those will be too expensive as they're harder to make at a low price (eg nikon's mechanical rangefinder) Supposedly, Nikon claims to have lost money on the S3 2000 rangefinder cameras. Leica had the brief and strange Serie 0 remake, though it seems the early high price did not hold up later. Then there have been various Voigtländer offering, arguably somewhat affordable. With SLR choices, there are still manual focus cameras made, though fewer mechanical shutters than in the past, at least in 35 mm. I think the sales success (relative) of the Leica M7 points out that at least some users might like some automation (aperture priority), and that might point out more of a future direction. The odd choice now is the Leica/Panasonic direct digital with somewhat manual control, and more manual interface. This combination of high and low tech could become somewhat popular in the future, though it is too early to tell if they are sales successes. - there's a current wave of everyone (mass public) converting to digital; digital is still expensive and not good enough yet (actually, most 5mp cameras are good enough for public right now; the resolution of a 6mp i read about today was described as an "overkill" by the reviewer), but sooner or lately digital will get there both in being cheap and being good-enough, and the current stock of film cameras in non-collector hands will slowly disappear, lost, trashed, etc, which means that there'll be less of them, especially when... It could be those old "collector" classics were just sitting on a shelf collecting dust, and not being used. While it might seem that a flood of used cameras is on EBAY, or elsewhere, when you look at some older camera choices, the prices have not become lower. Recall that as cameras age, they can also be prone to breaking, and broken cameras will not sell well. The age of some cameras will self limit the used market, since there would be less supply of good working examples. Many in the mass public think about 3 MP is good enough, and that segment sells very well. With camera phones soon hitting 2 or 3 MP on the mass market, that might be another direction that takes off. I don't always see this behaviour as similar to photography, since it is often more about electronic communications (e-mail, picture messaging), and instant gratification, than about recording history, or making printed photos. Obviously, people do make prints from direct digital imaging, but they are still the minority. I do think the P&S film camera market will become a niche. The only exception would be disposable one-time-use cameras, which recently saw about a 30% sales volume increase (going from the latest Fuji and Kodak information). There may be fewer P&S film camera choices available in the future, and the few there are might be high priced (similar to Contax T3, or Leica CM). - there'll be a point in not too long where most film cameras will be traded by either niche (film) shooters or collectors. I have seen quite a few classic cameras lately whose sellers on ebay said that they only found out how highly regarded and sought after they are when they did a search for info about them to fill in the ebay description, so i'll hypothesize that there'll be many "babies" will be gone (like for example the three olympus RCs I've seen lately which sellers told me they had no idea they were classic - i can only assume some won't make it to ebay) EBAY is definitely affecting the used camera market. I would not be surprised if the overall used film camera sales volume on EBAY is near what new film camera sales are now. It would also not surprise me if the used EBAY sales exceeds new sales in the future. - can they depreciate any more than they are right now? I would've thought digital cameras are somewhat stabilizing, there's already far more digital cameras on sale on ebay than film ones Higher turnover for direct digital, since the technology changes so quickly. Even the high end is affected by this. Compare that to a film camera that can often deliver many years of service at a known quality level, with film being the only variable. OR They will depreciate Some might, as they become less known, or less popular. Don't expect Leica M rangefinder prices to suddenly drop, nor working Nikon F models, nor many other popular cameras of the past. - i can't make up a rationale for this one as i find the above likely more persuasive, can you? It depends upon what you want to get. The more collectable items might just keep climbing in price. The lesser known cameras might get near give-away prices, meaning you might find some really great gear at very low cost. Keep watching, and shop carefully. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
Gordon Moat wrote:
The Nikon FM3A might continue to be produced for a few more years, though technically it could be considered an electronic camera. That leaves Leica, and maybe Contax to continue into the future with manual bodies, or at least manual focus. Gordon, I would bet that the last Nikon FM3A has already been produced. It is a very slow seller and current stocks are unlikely to be exhausted in the next couple of years, by which time demand will be near zero. Expect it to appear in Nikon's 2005 catalog, and probably in the 2006 edition. But don't expect many sales in 2007. Stocks of the 45mm f/2.8 AI-P Nikkor are also diminishing slowly. Don't expect any more to be produced. Tony |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
TP wrote:
Gordon Moat wrote: The Nikon FM3A might continue to be produced for a few more years, though technically it could be considered an electronic camera. That leaves Leica, and maybe Contax to continue into the future with manual bodies, or at least manual focus. Gordon, I would bet that the last Nikon FM3A has already been produced. It is a very slow seller and current stocks are unlikely to be exhausted in the next couple of years, by which time demand will be near zero. Unfortunately, likely to be very true. They may indeed have only done a few years production to build up inventory. Expect it to appear in Nikon's 2005 catalog, and probably in the 2006 edition. But don't expect many sales in 2007. I have heard a few predictions of both Nikon and Canon stopping film SLR sales in 2008. The reason for that year, is that it is anticipated that enough full frame affordable direct digital cameras will be available then to restrict production to only those types of SLRs. Stocks of the 45mm f/2.8 AI-P Nikkor are also diminishing slowly. Don't expect any more to be produced. While I have read nice reviews on this lens, it really is sort of slow at f2.8. Also, when I tried it, the focus ring was too small for me, since I have large hands. I doubt I would ever buy one. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
Gordon Moat wrote:
While I have read nice reviews on this lens, it really is sort of slow at f2.8. Also, when I tried it, the focus ring was too small for me, since I have large hands. I doubt I would ever buy one. Sadly, all too many people agree. This is a lens that appeals neither to Nikon's traditional MF user base nor to the AF users. Here in the UK it can be bought very cheaply, but Nikon UK discourage dealers from publishing these very attractive prices. It's a bit like Pentax UK with the MZ-S body, which can be bought at huge discounts off list price but is not advertised at those prices. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What will happen to classic film cameras?
In article ,
TP writes: It's a bit like Pentax UK with the MZ-S body, which can be bought at huge discounts off list price but is not advertised at those prices. Hmm, perhaps I should have asked around. Pentaxs UK website was advertising the MZ5n as a current camera when you could only get old stock from a few places, the official price was about twice what the street (or mail order) price seemed to be. -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insane new TSA rule for film inspection | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 94 | June 23rd 04 05:17 AM |
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography | Bob Monaghan | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | June 19th 04 05:48 PM |
Book Review: Collecting and Using Classic Cameras , Ivor Matanle | Paul | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | June 16th 04 09:04 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |