7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
No, what the thread is about. You can read it yourself, it's
written with text in English.

When you type "7D" how am I supposed to know you're refering to the
7D2

Because I wrote this:

Sandman
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
09/21/2014

"I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time.
I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the
new version of the 7D."

If you're still confused or think I'm unclear, feel free to - you know -
ask.

Only you would blame your own typo (or was it delibrate) on someone
elses reading ability.

No typo, and no blame has occured.

I'll have to ask a swedish friend and author whether it's a common
problem for swedes to understand such things.

I think most people understand things to a higher level than you do, not
just swedes.

Sandman:
Android: "Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO
6400..." Me: "Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100"

so how does the 7D and the 7D compare ?

In many ways, dpreview has a compare-function you can use.

Sandman:
Drunk Dave: "Eh, why is he talking about a different camera? I
don't understand!"

Why are you talking about the 7D and why talk about the D7100 ?

Because that's what the thread is about. See the subject?


--
Sandman[.net]