Sad you need to spend $7000 to get top DR from Canon

On 7/31/2016 3:43 PM, RichA wrote:
Meanwhile, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, you can have it for a grand or two.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/364002...on-d5?slide=11


So don't buy one. Now exactly where does the article prove your point?


--
PeterN

On 7/31/2016 10:31 PM, RichA wrote:
On Sunday, 31 July 2016 20:58:30 UTC-4, peterN wrote:
On 7/31/2016 3:43 PM, RichA wrote:
Meanwhile, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, you can have it for a grand or two.

https://www.dpreview.com/news/364002...on-d5?slide=11


So don't buy one. Now exactly where does the article prove your point?


--
PeterN

As far as I know, it's the only Canon that has DR as good as the Sony sensored cameras do. There is a graph in the article comparing it to the Nikon D5. BTW, the comment "so don't buy one" is an idiot's comment. It implies no one is able to render an opinion on anything unless they were thinking of buying it.


Where does your referenced article say that.
Your statement, as in many of your other statements, sound as if you
think you have an absolute right to the best quality, regardless of
cost. If you are in fact complaining about the cost, as your subject
line clearly says, your remedy is not to buy one. I do not own a Rolls
Royce. I have never seriously considered purchasing one, because I
cannot afford one.


--
PeterN