our beautiful granddaughter

http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:34:57 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
: http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

The flower dominates that picture too much, especially since the baby isn't
really looking at it. The only thing that ties the baby to the flower (other
than geographical proximity) is the color of the dots on her hat, which, BTW,
are out of focus.

Don't even think about starting a competition for granddaughter pictures in
this newsgroup. Many of us have granddaughters (I have three), and I assure
you that we can match you picture for picture. There's not enough bandwidth on
the Internet to keep that going for very long.

Bob

"Robert Coe" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:34:57 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
: http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

The flower dominates that picture too much, especially since the baby
isn't
really looking at it. The only thing that ties the baby to the flower
(other
than geographical proximity) is the color of the dots on her hat, which,
BTW,
are out of focus.

Don't even think about starting a competition for granddaughter pictures
in
this newsgroup. Many of us have granddaughters (I have three), and I
assure
you that we can match you picture for picture. There's not enough
bandwidth on
the Internet to keep that going for very long.

Bob

and you can determine that the baby wasn't looking at the flower?

I'm not trying to win or prove anything. I just snapped this today and felt
like sharing it. You wanna go back to bed for a little while ;-)

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:24:26 -0400, Robert Coe wrote:

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:34:57 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
: http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

The flower dominates that picture too much, especially since the baby isn't
really looking at it. The only thing that ties the baby to the flower (other
than geographical proximity) is the color of the dots on her hat, which, BTW,
are out of focus.

Don't even think about starting a competition for granddaughter pictures in
this newsgroup. Many of us have granddaughters (I have three), and I assure
you that we can match you picture for picture. There's not enough bandwidth on
the Internet to keep that going for very long.

I'll call your granddaughters and raise you two grandsons. Bright,
cute, *and* photogenic.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

eugene wrote:
http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

Nice.

And well considered background too (if I remember correctly).

--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

"eugene" wrote in message
...
http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

Absolutely gorgeous. A fun time in your life, yes?

"bino" wrote in message
. ..
"eugene" wrote in message
...
http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

Absolutely gorgeous. A fun time in your life, yes?

Brilliant! And she's living at our house so we have her all the time

...
http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg

Absolutely gorgeous. A fun time in your life, yes?

Brilliant! And she's living at our house so we have her all
the time

Indeed! That is a magnificent image. Well Done!

DB

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:05:46 -0400, tony cooper
wrote:
: On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:24:26 -0400, Robert Coe wrote:
:
: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:34:57 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
: : http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg
:
: The flower dominates that picture too much, especially since the baby isn't
: really looking at it. The only thing that ties the baby to the flower (other
: than geographical proximity) is the color of the dots on her hat, which, BTW,
: are out of focus.
:
: Don't even think about starting a competition for granddaughter pictures in
: this newsgroup. Many of us have granddaughters (I have three), and I assure
: you that we can match you picture for picture. There's not enough bandwidth on
: the Internet to keep that going for very long.
:
: I'll call your granddaughters and raise you two grandsons. Bright,
: cute, *and* photogenic.

chuckle! I also have two grandsons. Alas, my son isn't keen on having
pictures of his son and daughter posted. My daughter, a better child
photographer with her P&S than I am with my 400D and five lenses, has a Web
site for her three. ;^)

Bob

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 01:53:07 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
:
: "Robert Coe" wrote in message
: ...
: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 00:34:57 +0100, "eugene" wrote:
: : http://i36.tinypic.com/5zfbt2.jpg
:
: The flower dominates that picture too much, especially since the baby
: isn't
: really looking at it. The only thing that ties the baby to the flower
: (other
: than geographical proximity) is the color of the dots on her hat, which,
: BTW,
: are out of focus.
:
: Don't even think about starting a competition for granddaughter pictures
: in
: this newsgroup. Many of us have granddaughters (I have three), and I
: assure
: you that we can match you picture for picture. There's not enough
: bandwidth on
: the Internet to keep that going for very long.
:
: Bob
:
: and you can determine that the baby wasn't looking at the flower?
:
: I'm not trying to win or prove anything. I just snapped this today and felt
: like sharing it. You wanna go back to bed for a little while ;-)

The only excuse for posting pictures on this site is to have them criticized.
Read the charter if you doubt that. As Harry Truman was fond of saying, "If
you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."

Your picture is technically excellent. I'd be insulting your intelligence to
say otherwise. As for the composition, stare at it for five minutes and then
try to tell me you couldn't have done better.

Bob