A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Does anybody have an answer?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 6th 09, 01:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
N[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 362
Default Does anybody have an answer?

"sambarluc" wrote in message
...
Reading all the mess about DP2, and expectations on Olympus, and the
dissatisfaction of many (or at least me) with the building philosophy
of present day digital cameras, I came up with a thought.
Camera world seems a bit like the world of computing these days.
Companies sell always new, more powerful hardware to stay up to date
with new and more demanding software, which in fact very seldom
improves user experience. At least for software there's the open
source community, much more sensitive to a minimalist/high
productivity approach, but what about cameras? I have a silly idea: a
modular camera, that you can build on your needs like a PC. You don't
buy the 73rd autofocus point, if you don't need it. You don't buy
smile detection if you only use Av. You can keep it simple and
lightweight, or make it look like (Concise) Oxford dictionary, with as
many functions as MS Word. If cameras and electronics have to merge,
why not going all the way? A bit like Leica a la carte, but less
stupidly useless.
Now, why nobody came up with something like this? Why something like
this exists for medium format but not for more compact formats? Shall
I found a new company? ;-) Hey, anybody from Canon or Nikon listening?
I would really like to have a serious answer.
Andrea


It isn't cheap.
http://www.red.com/

--
N

  #2  
Old June 6th 09, 11:06 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Pete D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,613
Default Does anybody have an answer?


"sambarluc" wrote in message
...


It isn't cheap.http://www.red.com/

--



Who ever said it has to be cheap? If it's worth, there will probably
be a market anyway. Otherwise, red wouldn't exist.


The OP did by inference, if you don't need it then don't buy the feature he
said.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does anybody have an answer? Pete D Digital Photography 2 June 6th 09 11:13 AM
DSLR vs. P&S Smackdown -- the Answer Douglas Johnson[_2_] Digital Photography 85 August 18th 08 05:18 PM
Resampling the answer? NearAustin Digital Photography 3 June 10th 06 05:14 AM
TROLL: I need an answer quick!! Cynicor Digital Photography 32 May 3rd 06 02:17 AM
Final answer HELP! [email protected] Digital Photography 7 October 29th 05 08:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.