|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 23rd 08, 07:36 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
|
|||
|
|||
PS CS2 noise reduction for JPEGs is GARBAGE
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:46 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote: Worthless. Use any other programs, even Paint Shop Pros. I fail to understand why the RAW NR is acceptable while the JPEG is near useless. It basically smears detail like a touch-up brush on steroids. I've found the Noise Reduction Filter in CS2 does a pretty good job. There are better tools out there. If you need more or you frequently work with images that need NR, take a look at Noise Ninja and Neat Image. In the mean time, can you give us sample image and the Noise Reduction Filter settings you used? TR 
|
|
#2
July 23rd 08, 04:51 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
|
|||
|
|||
|
PS CS2 noise reduction for JPEGs is GARBAGE
TRoss wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:46 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: Worthless. Use any other programs, even Paint Shop Pros. I fail to understand why the RAW NR is acceptable while the JPEG is near useless. It basically smears detail like a touch-up brush on steroids. I've found the Noise Reduction Filter in CS2 does a pretty good job. There are better tools out there. If you need more or you frequently work with images that need NR, take a look at Noise Ninja and Neat Image. In the mean time, can you give us sample image and the Noise Reduction Filter settings you used? No, he can't! He just seems to like posting for the sake of seeing replies. I am now going to sit in the corner as I've replied twice. oh the shame -- john mcwilliams
|
|
#3
July 23rd 08, 07:40 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
|
|||
|
|||
|
PS CS2 noise reduction for JPEGs is GARBAGE
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:51:20 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote: TRoss wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:46 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: Worthless. Use any other programs, even Paint Shop Pros. I fail to understand why the RAW NR is acceptable while the JPEG is near useless. It basically smears detail like a touch-up brush on steroids. I've found the Noise Reduction Filter in CS2 does a pretty good job. There are better tools out there. If you need more or you frequently work with images that need NR, take a look at Noise Ninja and Neat Image. In the mean time, can you give us sample image and the Noise Reduction Filter settings you used? No, he can't! He just seems to like posting for the sake of seeing replies. I am now going to sit in the corner as I've replied twice. oh the shame I 'm sure he can ... I'm pretty sure there will be numerous Pigasus sightings before he will. I'm a little curious as to why he's blathering on about CS2 and its supposed inadequacies. Since February the shots he recently posted to pbase were processed with CS3. TR
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PS CS2 noise reduction for JPEGs is GARBAGE | John McWilliams | Digital SLR Cameras | 6 | July 23rd 08 11:38 PM |
| Noise Reduction software (Neat Image, Noise Ninja, etc.) | John Navas[_2_] | Digital Photography | 0 | October 19th 07 04:22 PM |
| In Camera Noise Reduction And RAW | Ali[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | October 13th 07 06:47 PM |
| Noise reduction? | PeteD | Digital Photography | 11 | March 29th 06 09:32 AM |
Linear Mode
