Why does a flash cause rainbow stripes in my digital photos?

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 14:13:45 UTC, Sandman wrote:
In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Rod Speed:
"tlvp" wrote in message
...

"tlvp" ... [ ... pointless babble snipped ... ]

tlvp:
I'm not into the sort of undocumented debating you seem to
enjoy.

Rod Speed:
You never could bull**** and lie your way out of a wet paper bag.

Unlike certain others that, can lie, have, and do bull****
themselves out of many situations Of course the honest don't use
those skills even if they have them.

Unlike you, who bull**** and lie and never get out of any situations.

No suprise you found this a little hard to take.

Just have a hard time with people that lie all the time. And when they're
morons like you, they're even less likeable.

--
Sandman[.net]

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

tlvp:
I'm not into the sort of undocumented debating you
seem to enjoy.

Rod Speed:
You never could bull**** and lie your way out
of a wet paper bag.

Whisky-dave:
Unlike certain others that, can lie, have, and do bull****
themselves out of many situations Of course the honest
don't use those skills even if they have them.

Sandman:
Unlike you, who bull**** and lie and never get out of any
situations.

Whisky-dave:
No suprise you found this a little hard to take.

Sandman:
Just have a hard time with people that lie all the time.

me too, that's why I tend not to lie .

Which makes it odd then that you do it so often on usenet if you don't do
it in real life. I've exposed so many lies from you in this group that it's
hilarious.


--
Sandman[.net]

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
Which makes it odd then that you do it so often on usenet if you
don't do it in real life. I've exposed so many lies from you in
this group that it's hilarious.

In your tiny little mind. I bet you can't even find these so called
lies you're talking about.

Of course I can, I always substantiate my claims, as you know. Here's one
lie:

Whisky-dave
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
10/08/2014

"He has also stated that's it's obvious that he's refering to the
7D mk ii when he says 7D"

This was a lie, I have never stated any such thing.

Whisky-dave
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
10/08/2014

"I have no way of knowing how you know the 7D2 or the 7D2
beta trounches the D7100 or any other camera and why you
mention the 7500 I have no idea."

I have never mentioned any supposed "7500".

Whisky-dave
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
09/25/2014

"Not in my world but in this thread you are calling both
cameras the 7D. So I can't actually terll teh differnce when
you say the 7D trounced the N7100"

I have never called two cameras "7D", this was yet another lie from you.

Whisky-dave
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
09/24/2014

"you said the 7D was trounced by the D700."

Another lie, I never said that.

Whisky-dave
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
09/24/2014

"the subject line states you are testing at 6400 nom mention of
any other specs."

Another lie, the subject line said no such thing.

Should I go on?

So are you going to pollute this thread
too. Well I'm not going to so it's up to you now.

Any thread you reply to is already polluted, drunk dave.


--
Sandman[.net]

In article , Whisky-dave wrote:

Sandman:
Which makes it odd then that you do it so often on
usenet if you don't do it in real life. I've exposed so many
lies from you in this group that it's hilarious.

Whisky-dave:
In your tiny little mind. I bet you can't even find these so
called lies you're talking about.

Sandman:
Of course I can, I always substantiate my claims, as you know.
Here's one lie:

snip

Run away little troll. It's what you do best.

--
Sandman[.net]