![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am looking for an original Deardorff reducing back.
I am looking for one in good condition with all pins attached and not pushed in. I do not want the sliding back with splitter version. Preferably I am seeking the plain jane version that does not have a revolving back. Depending on how long the search takes I could possibly be interested in a revolving back version. Thanks Greg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've got one complete with sliding inserts for splitting the frame into
halves or quarters. What are they worth? "Greg Landrum" wrote in message ... I am looking for an original Deardorff reducing back. I am looking for one in good condition with all pins attached and not pushed in. I do not want the sliding back with splitter version. Preferably I am seeking the plain jane version that does not have a revolving back. Depending on how long the search takes I could possibly be interested in a revolving back version. Thanks Greg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this the standard back that takes the splitters, or does your back
slide to two different positions and in conjuction with the splitters gives you two 3.5 x 5 images on one sheet? Here is a link to a regular spring back that just sold on ebay last week that looks to be in excellent condition. http://cgi.ebay.com/Deardorff-5x7-Re...QQcmdZViewItem Thanks Greg babelfish wrote: I've got one complete with sliding inserts for splitting the frame into halves or quarters. What are they worth? "Greg Landrum" wrote in message ... I am looking for an original Deardorff reducing back. I am looking for one in good condition with all pins attached and not pushed in. I do not want the sliding back with splitter version. Preferably I am seeking the plain jane version that does not have a revolving back. Depending on how long the search takes I could possibly be interested in a revolving back version. Thanks Greg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's the standard back that has splitters.
"gman" wrote in message t... Is this the standard back that takes the splitters, or does your back slide to two different positions and in conjuction with the splitters gives you two 3.5 x 5 images on one sheet? Here is a link to a regular spring back that just sold on ebay last week that looks to be in excellent condition. http://cgi.ebay.com/Deardorff-5x7-Re...QQcmdZViewItem Thanks Greg babelfish wrote: I've got one complete with sliding inserts for splitting the frame into halves or quarters. What are they worth? "Greg Landrum" wrote in message ... I am looking for an original Deardorff reducing back. I am looking for one in good condition with all pins attached and not pushed in. I do not want the sliding back with splitter version. Preferably I am seeking the plain jane version that does not have a revolving back. Depending on how long the search takes I could possibly be interested in a revolving back version. Thanks Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Large format Deardorff 8x10 View Field Camera - new price | Richard Brosseau | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 2 | January 10th 12 09:04 PM |
8x10 digital back? | P. Meschter | Digital Photography | 21 | March 17th 05 12:06 AM |
Da Yi 6x17 back for 4x5 [Review] | Bandicoot | Large Format Photography Equipment | 8 | January 26th 05 01:04 AM |
FS: 4x5 back for Kodak 2D 8x10 | Collin Brendemuehl | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 17th 04 07:32 PM |
FS: Deardorff 11x14 to 8x10 reducing back | DKFletcher | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 20th 03 12:57 PM |