If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon's lower-end lenses are so frigging ugly
"RichA" wrote in message
... On Oct 16, 8:08 pm, wrote: On Oct 15, 11:07 pm, RichA wrote: Tacky. Look at the font used! Looks like the sub-$100 silver crap that Tamron turned out in the 1980s. At least the L-glass doesn't look like this: http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/...p5-5p6_is_c16/ Only Rick would worry about what the lens looks like. Real photographers only bother looking at the results. Just think of it. You have to use that product, get it close to your face every time you use it, with that tacky, stenciled-on 1980s font up close! If you can take images immune to that psychological distraction, you are a great person. And if, with repeated use, the lettering eventually wears off, you'd complain about that, too. dwight |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon's lower-end lenses are so frigging ugly | Lasko | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | October 18th 08 09:14 PM |
Canon's lower-end lenses are so frigging ugly | Paul[_6_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | October 16th 08 06:25 PM |
New lower-priced line of Leica 'M' lenses | UC | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | August 12th 07 05:59 PM |
Canon's Wide lenses (24mm in particular) | wiyum | Digital SLR Cameras | 30 | February 17th 07 01:20 PM |