|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 16th 08, 06:25 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
|
|||
|
|||
Canon's lower-end lenses are so frigging ugly
"RichA" wrote in message
... Tacky. Look at the font used! Looks like the sub-$100 silver crap that Tamron turned out in the 1980s. At least the L-glass doesn't look like this: http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/...p5-5p6_is_c16/ The 100-400 is an 'L' lens and is quite an 'ugly' lens. Would you use it if it suited your needs, well of course. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canon's lower-end lenses are so frigging ugly | Lasko | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | October 18th 08 09:14 PM |
| New lower-priced line of Leica 'M' lenses | UC | 35mm Photo Equipment | 9 | August 12th 07 05:59 PM |
| Canon's Wide lenses (24mm in particular) | wiyum | Digital SLR Cameras | 30 | February 17th 07 01:20 PM |
| Canon's problem with WA lenses and FF (the solution?) | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 36 | March 22nd 06 10:46 AM |
Linear Mode
