If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
Ziploc will work, but be prepared to be standing there a while, the last
time I saw somebody hand over a bag of 30 or 40 rolls of film, they opened the bag, dumped them into a bin, and proceeded to go roll by roll swabbing and reading the swab, then doing it for the next one, looked like it would be quite a while. "Craig" wrote in message ... Hello...I know this topic has been hashed before (I've been going over the old Google archives), but it seems that the opinions are all over the map. I'm going to be making a trip from Cincinnati to Manila via Taipei and Los Angeles and will be bringing a fair amount of film (35mm, 25 rolls with ASA range from 64 to 400 all of it slide film and about 50 rolls of APS print film with an ASA range of 100 to 800). I would prefer to have the film hand inspected, given the number of security machines I will encounter round trip. What would be the best way to present the film in order to make the TSA more likely to agree to hand inspection. Is it okay to leave the film in the sealed cardboard boxes? (I would rather travel with it that way, but it would be a mess to have to open every package in security). I also plan on putting the film into clear ziploc bags. Should I then put the ziploc bag into a lead pouch (for use after leaving the U.S) and hand them the entire package, or simply hand them the clear ziploc? What I'm looking for is a consenus...what have others found to be the most likely way to get hand inspection of film while making it as painless as possible. Craig |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
Hello...I know this topic has been hashed before (I've been going over the
old Google archives), but it seems that the opinions are all over the map. I'm going to be making a trip from Cincinnati to Manila via Taipei and Los Angeles and will be bringing a fair amount of film (35mm, 25 rolls with ASA range from 64 to 400 all of it slide film and about 50 rolls of APS print film with an ASA range of 100 to 800). I would prefer to have the film hand inspected, given the number of security machines I will encounter round trip. What would be the best way to present the film in order to make the TSA more likely to agree to hand inspection. Is it okay to leave the film in the sealed cardboard boxes? (I would rather travel with it that way, but it would be a mess to have to open every package in security). I also plan on putting the film into clear ziploc bags. Should I then put the ziploc bag into a lead pouch (for use after leaving the U.S) and hand them the entire package, or simply hand them the clear ziploc? What I'm looking for is a consenus...what have others found to be the most likely way to get hand inspection of film while making it as painless as possible. Craig |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
Craig wrote:
Angeles and will be bringing a fair amount of film (35mm, 25 rolls with ASA range from 64 to 400 all of it slide film and about 50 rolls of APS print film with an ASA range of 100 to 800). When you request hand inspection, make sure you specify you have a number of rolls that are 400 and above. It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. For those cases where they refuse, you cfan then take the ziplok and put in it a lead bag and allow it through the x-ray. (Some say that they will just increase the power to see through it, but I am not sure if this is true or just urban myth). It will also help to mention that you are taking a large number flights and that while just one x-ray exposure may be ok, in your case, you need to reduce the cumulative effects. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
"nobody" wrote in message
... Craig wrote: It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. Absolutely the most important point - do all you can to make it easier for them to do what you want them to do. Taking the film out of the boxes and out of the cans and placing them in clear plastic bags to pretty much mandatory if you hope to have hand inspection outside the US. For those cases where they refuse, you cfan then take the ziplok and put in it a lead bag and allow it through the x-ray. (Some say that they will just increase the power to see through it, but I am not sure if this is true or just urban myth). Urban myth. It used to be true, but the technology has change while the story hasn't. The gate security x-ray machines IN THE US are pulsed - they work like an electronic flash that uses x-rays instead of visible light. It captures a snapshot to the video display on the system. These machines use this method to reduce the amount of x-rays required to get a useful image so as to minimize the weight of the machines. Now that they are needed in large numbers, the old continuous beam types would place more weight in a limited area (because of the shielding required) than most structures can support. It was those older types that allowed the operator to raised the intensity of the x-ray beam, something that was counter to the shielding designed to minimize exposure of the security staff. Exit trivia mode. But, having raised the subject - it is more important to do your best to get hand inspection outside the US. We pushed countries around the world to increase airport security and helped them do it by giving them the old, continuous beam x-ray machines we replaced with our new flash-types. So you can expect to encounter stronger x-rays if you travel outside the US, western Europe, and Japan. This puts more importance on arranging your film in an easy-to-inspect configuration and asking very nicely (outside the US you have no rights), and letting them know your are concerned about the cumulative effect of all the x-rays on your ROUND TRIP. And be sure to allow yourself enough time. You have a right under FAA rules to request hand inspection, but there are no specifications about how fast it has to get done. So irritating the security staff isn't in your best ineterst, nor is hiding the film in canisters or boxes. Getting hand inspection, avoiding the x-ray exposure, and missing your plane won't make for memorable trip. Actually, it will, but not the kind most folks try for. It will also help to mention that you are taking a large number flights and that while just one x-ray exposure may be ok, in your case, you need to reduce the cumulative effects. And, if you haven't heard or read, NEVER NEVER NEVER put your film into a checked-in bag. All checked luggage gets a CT scan in all US airports now - there's no escaping it, and it will fog your film, even the slower stuff. Bob in Las Vegas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays OT - Bob
Bob-
Interesting input older x-ray machines, specifically the user's ability to "adjust" them. Can you be more specific? I've worked on a number of early 80's vintage PerkinElmer x-ray machines in airports, but have never seen one that was adjustable "on-the-fly". And I suppose you can say they are "pulsed", in that items are x-rayed in "slices" and the images are assembled by video boards ( or nowadays, the computer inside ), and the image moves across the monitor to coincide with the movement of the belt. Cheers. LH "JRF" wrote in message news:OLlTb.16511$tP1.7787@fed1read07... "nobody" wrote in message ... Craig wrote: It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. Absolutely the most important point - do all you can to make it easier for them to do what you want them to do. Taking the film out of the boxes and out of the cans and placing them in clear plastic bags to pretty much mandatory if you hope to have hand inspection outside the US. For those cases where they refuse, you cfan then take the ziplok and put in it a lead bag and allow it through the x-ray. (Some say that they will just increase the power to see through it, but I am not sure if this is true or just urban myth). Urban myth. It used to be true, but the technology has change while the story hasn't. The gate security x-ray machines IN THE US are pulsed - they work like an electronic flash that uses x-rays instead of visible light. It captures a snapshot to the video display on the system. These machines use this method to reduce the amount of x-rays required to get a useful image so as to minimize the weight of the machines. Now that they are needed in large numbers, the old continuous beam types would place more weight in a limited area (because of the shielding required) than most structures can support. It was those older types that allowed the operator to raised the intensity of the x-ray beam, something that was counter to the shielding designed to minimize exposure of the security staff. Exit trivia mode. But, having raised the subject - it is more important to do your best to get hand inspection outside the US. We pushed countries around the world to increase airport security and helped them do it by giving them the old, continuous beam x-ray machines we replaced with our new flash-types. So you can expect to encounter stronger x-rays if you travel outside the US, western Europe, and Japan. This puts more importance on arranging your film in an easy-to-inspect configuration and asking very nicely (outside the US you have no rights), and letting them know your are concerned about the cumulative effect of all the x-rays on your ROUND TRIP. And be sure to allow yourself enough time. You have a right under FAA rules to request hand inspection, but there are no specifications about how fast it has to get done. So irritating the security staff isn't in your best ineterst, nor is hiding the film in canisters or boxes. Getting hand inspection, avoiding the x-ray exposure, and missing your plane won't make for memorable trip. Actually, it will, but not the kind most folks try for. It will also help to mention that you are taking a large number flights and that while just one x-ray exposure may be ok, in your case, you need to reduce the cumulative effects. And, if you haven't heard or read, NEVER NEVER NEVER put your film into a checked-in bag. All checked luggage gets a CT scan in all US airports now - there's no escaping it, and it will fog your film, even the slower stuff. Bob in Las Vegas |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
"nobody" wrote in message
... Craig wrote: Angeles and will be bringing a fair amount of film (35mm, 25 rolls with ASA range from 64 to 400 all of it slide film and about 50 rolls of APS film with an ASA range of 100 to 800). When you request hand inspection, make sure you specify you have a number of rolls that are 400 and above. It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. For those cases where they refuse, you cfan then take the ziplok and put in it a lead bag and allow it through the x-ray. (Some say that they will just increase the power to see through it, but I am not sure if this is true or just urban myth). It will also help to mention that you are taking a large number flights and that while just one x-ray exposure may be ok, in your case, you need to reduce the cumulative effects. Mentioning that you have to take or have already taken a number of flights is no good. We just got "So what" looks on our last trip RTW (I think it was 14 x-ray machines in total) and all staff said there was "no problem" unless you were using ultra fast film of at least 800 asa. I did insist on a hand search at Honolulu though and they did indeed hand search my films but I only had about 6 left by this time (x-ray machine no.13 I believe). Anyway, not one of our films was damaged. Half were 400asa the rest 200/100asa. Also, I suggest that you get the films processed as you use them. MC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
MC wrote:
"nobody" wrote in message ... Craig wrote: Angeles and will be bringing a fair amount of film (35mm, 25 rolls with ASA range from 64 to 400 all of it slide film and about 50 rolls of APS film with an ASA range of 100 to 800). When you request hand inspection, make sure you specify you have a number of rolls that are 400 and above. It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. For those cases where they refuse, you cfan then take the ziplok and put in it a lead bag and allow it through the x-ray. (Some say that they will just increase the power to see through it, but I am not sure if this is true or just urban myth). It will also help to mention that you are taking a large number flights and that while just one x-ray exposure may be ok, in your case, you need to reduce the cumulative effects. Mentioning that you have to take or have already taken a number of flights is no good. We just got "So what" looks on our last trip RTW (I think it was 14 x-ray machines in total) and all staff said there was "no problem" unless you were using ultra fast film of at least 800 asa. I did insist on a hand search at Honolulu though and they did indeed hand search my films but I only had about 6 left by this time (x-ray machine no.13 I believe). Anyway, not one of our films was damaged. Half were 400asa the rest 200/100asa. Also, I suggest that you get the films processed as you use them. MC Why not go here and ask them? http://www.tsa.gov/public/contactus Yaz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
In article ,
"Craig" wrote: Hello...I know this topic has been hashed before (I've been going over the old Google archives), but it seems that the opinions are all over the map. Leave the film at home (or don't even buy it) and travel with a digital camera. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
Other options to consider:
Purchase film when you get to your destination. Mail it back to your favorite mail order finisher. Include a roll of T-max P3200 film in each Ziploc bag. You are more likely to get a hand inspection. Most important (as JRF already said) NEVER put film in checked baggage! -- Ron Andrews http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
flying, film and X-rays
JRF wrote: "nobody" wrote in message ... Craig wrote: It is best to arrive at the inspection point with all rolls out of the boxes and canisters in a ziplok bag. Make it easy for them to do a very fast hand inspection. I've flown once with film and requested a hand inspection. In the US, they looked at me like I was nuts. They then allowed me stand in their secondary inspection lane for about 40 minutes while they did everything else they could before inspecting my film. They did the swipe with each individual roll. Then they did re-reviewed me. X-rayed shoes, pat down and all that. On the return through CDG, they just told me to put in the machine. End of story. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Develper for Delta-100 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 1st 04 05:36 PM |
Will we always be able to buy film? | Phil Glaser | In The Darkroom | 30 | January 28th 04 06:11 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 10:51 PM |
(newbie) What film most accurately reflects what we see? | Adrian | Film & Labs | 12 | October 22nd 03 03:22 PM |