A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

35mm on grade 3 explained



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old September 15th 04, 09:21 PM
Jim Phelps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"jjs" wrote in message
...
"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...

"jjs" wrote in message


I knew that. Darn. I'll bet you and I could have a heck of a flame
war.


Well, then, you oversize patoot! So there, your move ;~))) What's a
patoot anyway???


Are you saing I'm immature ya big Poopie Head?



Stop or I'll get my big brother to beat you up!

Thanks for the humor. I needed it today. Everything I touched either went
wrong or burnt. I even burnt a pan of Uncle Ben's rice tonight. It's late
here, and I'm glad this day is over.

Have a good night John...


  #92  
Old September 15th 04, 09:24 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...

Thanks for the humor. I needed it today. Everything I touched either
went wrong or burnt. I even burnt a pan of Uncle Ben's rice tonight.
It's late here, and I'm glad this day is over.

Have a good night John...


It's mid-afternoon here and I'm crunching a 1.8gb (yes, giga) photoshop
file. Pain, pain! No fun at all.


  #93  
Old September 15th 04, 09:24 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...

Thanks for the humor. I needed it today. Everything I touched either
went wrong or burnt. I even burnt a pan of Uncle Ben's rice tonight.
It's late here, and I'm glad this day is over.

Have a good night John...


It's mid-afternoon here and I'm crunching a 1.8gb (yes, giga) photoshop
file. Pain, pain! No fun at all.


  #94  
Old September 15th 04, 09:24 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...

Thanks for the humor. I needed it today. Everything I touched either
went wrong or burnt. I even burnt a pan of Uncle Ben's rice tonight.
It's late here, and I'm glad this day is over.

Have a good night John...


It's mid-afternoon here and I'm crunching a 1.8gb (yes, giga) photoshop
file. Pain, pain! No fun at all.


  #95  
Old September 15th 04, 09:27 PM
Jim Phelps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...
"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
You'll note that many zonazis rely on printed materials that are even
older. Adams wrote his books in the late 1940's. White wrote the ZSM
in the early 1950's. White refers to a couple of articles by Davenport
published in 1940 in US Camera. So that argument won't wash, dear! You
can't have it both ways! If you dismiss this because it was written in
1960, you must dismiss all of the classic zs effluvium.



Uhh, my copy of Fred Picker's (RIP) book _Zone VI Workshop_ is
copyrighted
in 1974. Not exactly new, but it has a 14 year leap on your references.
Also, my copy of Carson Graves _The Zone System for 35mm Photographers_
(2nd
Edition) is copyrighted in 1997. Wow, on your timeline that was like
yesterday or last week even...


Not relevant, in that the notion of variable film development was
ALREADY around, and acknowledged and dismissed by Kodak in the 1952
material. That material cites the shortcomings of the thought behind
it.

And nothing has changed since 1952? Then please, oh please tell us where to
get Verichrome Pan or Super-XX.



  #96  
Old September 15th 04, 09:27 PM
Jim Phelps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...
"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
You'll note that many zonazis rely on printed materials that are even
older. Adams wrote his books in the late 1940's. White wrote the ZSM
in the early 1950's. White refers to a couple of articles by Davenport
published in 1940 in US Camera. So that argument won't wash, dear! You
can't have it both ways! If you dismiss this because it was written in
1960, you must dismiss all of the classic zs effluvium.



Uhh, my copy of Fred Picker's (RIP) book _Zone VI Workshop_ is
copyrighted
in 1974. Not exactly new, but it has a 14 year leap on your references.
Also, my copy of Carson Graves _The Zone System for 35mm Photographers_
(2nd
Edition) is copyrighted in 1997. Wow, on your timeline that was like
yesterday or last week even...


Not relevant, in that the notion of variable film development was
ALREADY around, and acknowledged and dismissed by Kodak in the 1952
material. That material cites the shortcomings of the thought behind
it.

And nothing has changed since 1952? Then please, oh please tell us where to
get Verichrome Pan or Super-XX.



  #97  
Old September 15th 04, 09:27 PM
Jim Phelps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
"Jim Phelps" wrote in message
...
"Uranium Committee" wrote in message
om...
You'll note that many zonazis rely on printed materials that are even
older. Adams wrote his books in the late 1940's. White wrote the ZSM
in the early 1950's. White refers to a couple of articles by Davenport
published in 1940 in US Camera. So that argument won't wash, dear! You
can't have it both ways! If you dismiss this because it was written in
1960, you must dismiss all of the classic zs effluvium.



Uhh, my copy of Fred Picker's (RIP) book _Zone VI Workshop_ is
copyrighted
in 1974. Not exactly new, but it has a 14 year leap on your references.
Also, my copy of Carson Graves _The Zone System for 35mm Photographers_
(2nd
Edition) is copyrighted in 1997. Wow, on your timeline that was like
yesterday or last week even...


Not relevant, in that the notion of variable film development was
ALREADY around, and acknowledged and dismissed by Kodak in the 1952
material. That material cites the shortcomings of the thought behind
it.

And nothing has changed since 1952? Then please, oh please tell us where to
get Verichrome Pan or Super-XX.



  #98  
Old September 15th 04, 09:58 PM
Frank Pittel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Phelps wrote:

: "Uranium Committee" wrote in message
: om...
: "Jim Phelps" wrote in message
: ...
: "Uranium Committee" wrote in message
: om...
: You'll note that many zonazis rely on printed materials that are even
: older. Adams wrote his books in the late 1940's. White wrote the ZSM
: in the early 1950's. White refers to a couple of articles by Davenport
: published in 1940 in US Camera. So that argument won't wash, dear! You
: can't have it both ways! If you dismiss this because it was written in
: 1960, you must dismiss all of the classic zs effluvium.
:
:
:
: Uhh, my copy of Fred Picker's (RIP) book _Zone VI Workshop_ is
: copyrighted
: in 1974. Not exactly new, but it has a 14 year leap on your references.
: Also, my copy of Carson Graves _The Zone System for 35mm Photographers_
: (2nd
: Edition) is copyrighted in 1997. Wow, on your timeline that was like
: yesterday or last week even...
:
: Not relevant, in that the notion of variable film development was
: ALREADY around, and acknowledged and dismissed by Kodak in the 1952
: material. That material cites the shortcomings of the thought behind
: it.
:
: And nothing has changed since 1952? Then please, oh please tell us where to
: get Verichrome Pan or Super-XX.

Why go back to those old technoloy and obsolete films? I would much rather stick
with Tmax-100 which is the finest B&W ever made.

Maybe the change in film technology is why Kodak has changed it's stance on
things like the zone system.


--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

  #99  
Old September 15th 04, 10:17 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Frank Pittel" wrote in message
...

Why go back to those old technoloy and obsolete films? I would much rather
stick
with Tmax-100 which is the finest B&W ever made.


Frank, you say that a lot. I expect to see that tatooed on you when we meet
up.


  #100  
Old September 15th 04, 10:17 PM
jjs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Frank Pittel" wrote in message
...

Why go back to those old technoloy and obsolete films? I would much rather
stick
with Tmax-100 which is the finest B&W ever made.


Frank, you say that a lot. I expect to see that tatooed on you when we meet
up.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
advantage of high $ 35mm optics vs. MF now lost? Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 30 September 12th 04 04:46 AM
Removing 35mm mask on Durst M606? Luigi de Guzman In The Darkroom 4 March 1st 04 04:09 AM
split grade printing - can it be done with only G5 +G0 filters? Jules Flynn In The Darkroom 3 February 7th 04 04:46 AM
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner bleanne APS Photographic Equipment 1 November 27th 03 07:34 AM
FA: NIKON LS-4500AF HiEnd LargeFormatFilm Scanner bleanne Other Photographic Equipment 1 November 27th 03 07:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.