If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bellows on 10D using Contax lenses!
Jytzel,
I use the S-Planar 60/2.8 on a D30 with a simple adapter. This is the same optical design as your lens. Yes, there is a Contax brand bellows with shift, and also tilt. Ignoring the camera, I see two problems: lens clearance, and image circle. By lens clearance, I mean the distance between the lens flange and the camera-side bellows flange. This distance must encompass the bellows itself and the mounting apparatus on both its ends. Now, the SP60 has no floating elements, which is good for bellows use. Less ideal is the physical extension of its single optical cell of 62mm from infinity focus to the 1:1 position. Even if the bellows assembly can fit within 62mm, there will be very little room for fun, especially tilt. Plus, you will be constricted to the near-macro end of the range. Except for the PC-Distagon, I expect the image circle for most C/Y lenses, including the SP60, to be extremely tight. This is for reasons of economy, and lens weight. There will, therefore, be little enjoyment of shift movement. As mentioned early, tilt is also a problem for clearance reasons. Based only on eBay pictures of the Contax bellows, that's my gloomy assessment. Frankly, the Zörk route seems more plausible. Besides the cool hardware, you will get a proper lens for the purpose - one with a full range of focus distance, and a generous image circle. -------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bellows on 10D using Contax lenses!
Jytzel,
I use the S-Planar 60/2.8 on a D30 with a simple adapter. This is the same optical design as your lens. Yes, there is a Contax brand bellows with shift, and also tilt. Ignoring the camera, I see two problems: lens clearance, and image circle. By lens clearance, I mean the distance between the lens flange and the camera-side bellows flange. This distance must encompass the bellows itself and the mounting apparatus on both its ends. Now, the SP60 has no floating elements, which is good for bellows use. Less ideal is the physical extension of its single optical cell of 62mm from infinity focus to the 1:1 position. Even if the bellows assembly can fit within 62mm, there will be very little room for fun, especially tilt. Plus, you will be constricted to the near-macro end of the range. Except for the PC-Distagon, I expect the image circle for most C/Y lenses, including the SP60, to be extremely tight. This is for reasons of economy, and lens weight. There will, therefore, be little enjoyment of shift movement. As mentioned early, tilt is also a problem for clearance reasons. Based only on eBay pictures of the Contax bellows, that's my gloomy assessment. Frankly, the Zörk route seems more plausible. Besides the cool hardware, you will get a proper lens for the purpose - one with a full range of focus distance, and a generous image circle. -------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Leica digital back info.... | Barney | 35mm Photo Equipment | 19 | June 30th 04 12:45 AM |
Best bag for CONTAX 645 AF camera and lenses? | Ronald Shu | Photographing Nature | 2 | June 19th 04 01:41 AM |
Best bag for CONTAX 645 AF camera and lenses? | Ronald Shu | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 1 | June 19th 04 01:27 AM |
Asking advice | Bugs Bunny | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 69 | March 9th 04 05:42 AM |