If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 10/11/2014 05:54 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
snip First, I doubt very much that is the above specified $90 point and shoot camera, hence you are not supporting what was claimed. Wrong. sheesh |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
philo* wrote:
On 10/11/2014 05:54 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: snip First, I doubt very much that is the above specified $90 point and shoot camera, hence you are not supporting what was claimed. Wrong. sheesh Bull****. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:54:21 -0800, (Floyd L.
Davidson) wrote: Only very exceptional individuals differ from the norm. That follows, by definition. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2014 02:54:21 -0800, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Only very exceptional individuals differ from the norm. That follows, by definition. Exactly. And trying to define a norm by citing exceptions is never productive. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 10/11/2014 01:41 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
philo wrote: On 10/11/2014 05:54 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: snip First, I doubt very much that is the above specified $90 point and shoot camera, hence you are not supporting what was claimed. Wrong. sheesh Bull****. go troll elsewhere /plonk/ |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
philo* wrote:
On 10/11/2014 01:41 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: philo wrote: On 10/11/2014 05:54 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: snip First, I doubt very much that is the above specified $90 point and shoot camera, hence you are not supporting what was claimed. Wrong. sheesh Bull****. go troll elsewhere /plonk/ You make up stories, and when confronted call someone a troll? -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/ Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 2014-10-11 13:44:10 +0000, philoÂ* said:
On 10/11/2014 05:54 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: snip First, I doubt very much that is the above specified $90 point and shoot camera, hence you are not supporting what was claimed. Wrong. sheesh Just give us a link to the shots you are raving about, since you have already displayed this photog/artist's images in one of your shows, that shouldn't be a problem for you. As for which camera he used, it would be nice to know the model and that should be available via the EXIF data. It is good to see the work of talented folks from time-to-time. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 10/11/2014 08:16 PM, Savageduck wrote:
Just give us a link to the shots you are raving about, since you have already displayed this photog/artist's images in one of your shows, that shouldn't be a problem for you. As for which camera he used, it would be nice to know the model and that should be available via the EXIF data. It is good to see the work of talented folks from time-to-time. I put the other guy in my KF for being a boor... I just did a quick google search and see some pretty decent point and shoot cameras in the less than $100 range. The whole point I was making was that one needs an eye for photography for the photo to be any good and if one has that eye...the photos from a decent but lower end camera will be better than those someone gets with an expensive camera who does not know how to use it. Anyway here is one image the guy took...No processing was done other than greatly lowering the resolution for posting on the web https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.n...07725285_o.jpg If you don't like it , that's fine but it's superior to anything the other guy took with his expensive Nikon |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 2014-10-12 04:05:18 +0000, philoÂ* said:
On 10/11/2014 08:16 PM, Savageduck wrote: Just give us a link to the shots you are raving about, since you have already displayed this photog/artist's images in one of your shows, that shouldn't be a problem for you. As for which camera he used, it would be nice to know the model and that should be available via the EXIF data. It is good to see the work of talented folks from time-to-time. I put the other guy in my KF for being a boor... I just did a quick google search and see some pretty decent point and shoot cameras in the less than $100 range. The whole point I was making was that one needs an eye for photography for the photo to be any good and if one has that eye...the photos from a decent but lower end camera will be better than those someone gets with an expensive camera who does not know how to use it. Anyway here is one image the guy took...No processing was done other than greatly lowering the resolution for posting on the web https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.n...07725285_o.jpg If you don't like it , that's fine but it's superior to anything the other guy took with his expensive Nikon -- Regards, Savageduck |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot out: Smart phone vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III
On 2014-10-12 04:05:18 +0000, philoÂ* said:
On 10/11/2014 08:16 PM, Savageduck wrote: Just give us a link to the shots you are raving about, since you have already displayed this photog/artist's images in one of your shows, that shouldn't be a problem for you. As for which camera he used, it would be nice to know the model and that should be available via the EXIF data. It is good to see the work of talented folks from time-to-time. I put the other guy in my KF for being a boor... Floyd can be a PITA at times, especially when he does whatever he can to establish his expertise with all things in arcane technology. Other than that he has a personally established knowledge of all things, and quite often can provide some useful advise & information. Sometimes he can give that advise and information without belittling those on the receiving end. I just did a quick google search and see some pretty decent point and shoot cameras in the less than $100 range. If that is what one can afford and produces images you are satisfied with, there is a place for those cameras. The whole point I was making was that one needs an eye for photography for the photo to be any good and if one has that eye...the photos from a decent but lower end camera will be better than those someone gets with an expensive camera who does not know how to use it. That happens every day. I am sure that there are individuals who spend $5-10K on equipment and when they produce nothing view-worthy they give up the hobby. Anyway here is one image the guy took...No processing was done other than greatly lowering the resolution for posting on the web https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.n...07725285_o.jpg If you don't like it , that's fine but it's superior to anything the other guy took with his expensive Nikon Then the other guy's work must have been awful. That shot is to my eye (just an opinion) a reasonable snap shot. It just doesn't rise to the level of photographic fine art. Personally I would have done something quite different with it, starting with a severe crop as the buildings, and the shooter's shadow on the ice don't really work. However that doesn't meant there isn't an interesting image in there. To end up with something like this. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1295663/FileChute/Philo-C2.jpg -- Regards, Savageduck |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which smart phone has the best camera? | Paul Furman | Digital Photography | 18 | February 27th 09 01:29 AM |
Camera..Pc..Laptop..Phone Accessories..Mobile phone..shopping onlineat Amazon | mster | Digital Photography | 0 | March 26th 08 10:47 AM |
Camera..Pc..Laptop..Phone Accessories..Mobile phone..shopping onlineat Amazon | mster | Digital Photography | 0 | March 26th 08 10:47 AM |
Canon Mark II versus Canon Mark III | Savant | Digital SLR Cameras | 50 | March 2nd 08 01:44 AM |
cheaper IPOD nano,cell phone,iphone,vertu phone,samsung chinasupplier | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | January 26th 08 12:24 AM |