CONGRESS PASSING INTERNET LAWS-was-THE GOTI PROJECT IS READYFOR "YOU"!

239 wrote:
TODAY C-SPAN COVERED CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS ALMOST ALL DAY THAT DEALS
WITH LAWS THAT AFFECT THE INTERNET. DO A GOOGLE SEARCH FOR C-SPAN WHERE
YOU CAN SEE & HEAR THOSE HEARINGS FOR YOURSELF.
--
HERE IS AN ARTICLE THAT COVERS "SOME" OF WHAT IT IS GOING ON. OPEN THE
URL FOR "MORE INFO".
-----
Subject: WHY USENET USERS-NEED TO CONTACT THEIR CONGRESS PERSON RE
USENET ABUSE
---
Subject:6-07-06-RE TED STEVENS-Senate panel to revisit Net neutrality
proposal
--
http://news.com.com/Senate+panel+to+...50.html?tag=nl

--
TEXT COPY:
--
Senate panel to revisit Net neutrality proposal By Anne Broache
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: June 7, 2006, 8:15 AM PDT
--
TalkBack E-mail Print
--
WASHINGTON--Net neutrality provisions criticized by Internet companies
in a sweeping U.S. Senate proposal could be getting a makeover.
--
Sen. Ted Stevens, the Alaska Republican who serves as chairman of the
Senate Commerce Committee, said Wednesday that he plans to release a
revised version of his committee's broad communications bill because
"many members do not believe that the (Net neutrality) provision in the
existing bill goes far enough."
----
Addressing about 300 cable industry representatives at the start of a
summit organized by the National Cable and Telecommunications
Association, Stevens said he is still working with one major critic--
---
Sen. Daniel Inouye, the committee's top Democrat--
---
on new language that should be available later this week.
--
A hearing on the revised version is scheduled for June 13. ---
Net neutrality, or network neutrality, has proven itself one of the
most contentious topics that Congress faces as it attempts to "rewrite
the nation's telecommunications laws
**********************************************
this year.
***********
Proponents,
************
including
some of the largest Internet companies and a
**********************************************
wide array of consumer groups,
***********************************
define it as the "idea" that
network operators should "not be allowed" to
**********************************************
prioritize Internet content and services
*******************************************
that travel across their pipes or make deals with companies seeking
special treatment.
---
Network operators from the telephone and cable industries, allied with
some of the nation's largest hardware companies, have said repeatedly
that:
they have no plans to block, degrade or impair
**********************************************
content and argue that "new regulations"
*********************************************
are unnecessary."
*******************
Right now, the Senate communications bill addresses "Net neutrality" by
directing the Federal Communications
*******************************************
Commission to keep an "eye on incidents" that
**********************************************
could be "considered violations" of the concept
***********************************
and
"to report its findings to Congress."
*************************************
But Democrats and at least one Republican on the Senate Commerce
Committee have been pressuring the chairman to: "incorporate more
stringent regulations."
********************************************
Last month that group introduced a bill with a long list of detailed
rules:
"prohibiting network operators from prioritizing
**********************************************
content as they please."
*************************
---
Stevens said Wednesday that he still has reservations about issuing
sweeping regulations
"before Congress really knows what the
*********************************************
problem is."
************
He said the "revision would be focused on":
(1) "protecting the needs and rights of consumers,
---
(2) preserving network management and
---
(3) stimulating commercial interaction between companies" but was
unable to supply additional details.
---
The senator told reporters after his speech that he didn't plan to give
the FCC the power to
**********************************************
make new rules on the subject,
**********************************
though
"the commission would be given the power to
**********************************************
take "enforcement action"
****************************
related to "consumer complaints."
***********************************
---
In other news:
------------------
If that's the case, the revised Senate bill could end up taking a
similar approach to its U.S. House of Representatives counterpart,
which
----------------------------------------------
authorizes the FCC to police violations
*******************************************
of its broadband use principles and
levy fines if appropriate
but bars the regulators from making new rules.
**********************************************
That technique has earned
"deep disapproval from Net neutrality fans", who say it doesn't do
enough to ward off discriminatory tactics by network operators.
----
The House measure has already received committee approval and could go
up for floor debate and a vote as soon as Thursday. TalkBack E-mail
Print
---
READ MORE ON THIS STORY'S TOPICS AND COMPANIES Related news
-----------------
Net neutrality showdown
Special report, June 7, 2006
---
Net neutrality fans pressure U.S. Senate May 24, 2006
----
Net neutrality field in Congress gets crowded May 19, 2006 ----
Democratic senator wants Net neutrality regulations May 9, 2006
----
Net neutrality missing from sweeping telecom bill May 1, 2006
----
Push for Net neutrality mandate grows
March 17, 2006
---
Senator: Net neutrality may not happen
March 14, 2006
---
Get this story's "Big Picture"
World Cup matchup: FIFA vs. the hackers
��Broache Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: June 7, 2006, 8:15 AM
----------------
Subject: TAKE ACTION NOW-EMAIL THIS POST & SIG TO YOUR CONGRESS PERSON
&
YOUR STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL & ASK THEM TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE U.S.
ATTORNEY GENERAL THAT "YOU" WANT FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO STOP THE GANGS
ON THE USENET AND INTERNET FROM THEIR VICIOUS & ADMITTED ATTACKS ON
ADULTS & CHILDREN & THAT WE (GOTI-(GANGS-ON-THE-INTERNET) PROJECT WILL
HELP THEM & SAVE THE ISP/SERVERS, MULTI-MILLIONS OF DOLLARS BY
PROVIDING "ONE SOURCE" OF INVESTIGATING & REPORTING THESE INTERNET
CRIMINALS ON THE INTERNET, TO THE "FED/STATE DOJ" FOR PROSECUTION.
--
Subject:Full Contact List for the Attorneys General IN ALL STATES:
http://www.naag.org/ag/full_ag_table.php
--
Subject:Write Your Representative - Contact your Congress-person in the
U.S. House of Representatives.
and ask them to create this federal legislation, which Must include
foreign ISPS/SERVERS when they use U.S.A. ISP/SERVERS.
http://www.house.gov/writerep/
--
Subject:U.S. Senate: Senators Home
http://www.senate.gov/general/contac...nators_cfm.cfm
--
HERE IS WHAT THE "RESPONSIBLE ISP/SERVERS" HAVE BEEN DOING TO REMOVE
THESE SAME PSYCHOTICS & MALICIOUS PEOPLE.
THESE ISPS "ARE ALL "FOR" REMOVING THESE PEOPLE, UNLIKE THE RECENT
COMMENTS BEING MADE BY THE "GREEDY HUGE INTERNET CORPS".
---
Subject:Arbor Networks, Inc.
http://www.arbor.net/fingerprint-sharing-alliance.php
--
IT IS THESE "SAME PSYCHOTIC CRIMINALS" WHO USE THE USENET THAT ARE
INVOLVED IN THESE CHILD-RAPE AND PORNOGRAPHY CASES, MANY OF WHICH HAVE
ALREADY BEEN INVESTIGATED AND ANNOUNCED ON USENET. WHO BETTER TO
COLLECT & REPORT THESE PSYCHOPATHS THEN US WHO ARE THE USERS OF USENET?

--
HERE IS WHAT PSYCHIATRISTS SAY ABOUT THESE INTERNET PSYCHOTICS:
Subject:Antisocial personality disorder and the serial bully
http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/apd.htm
--
HERE IS JUST ONE OF HUNDREDS OF WEBSITES THAT HAS BEEN SET UP BY THESE
INTERNET PSYCHOTICS WHICH BLATANTLY STATE HOW THEY INTENTIONALLY ATTACK
A USER OF THE INTERNET/USENET AND AS A VICTIM/TARGET OF THEIRS, YOU
KNOW THESE PSYCHOTIC GANGS COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS, LIKE HACKING AND
DESTROYING YOUR COMPUTER IF YOU PROTEST AGAINST THEIR MALICIOUS ACTS.
--
Subject:Teh WAY of teh KOOK
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
SEND THIS TO OTHERS, ASAP-THERE IS NO TIME TO WASTE...THIS FEDERAL
ACTION IS TAKING PLACE "NOW"-6-02-06-. SYLVIA

Almost encroyable !!

f-u set; dubious groups deleted.

--
lsmft