D60: LARGER THAN LIFE !!!

Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution (3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes

"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of
course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution
(3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes

Another fine shot, sharp shot.

that's one mean set of bugs

Artie

"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message
...
"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of
course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution
(3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes

Another fine shot, sharp shot.

that's one mean set of bugs

Artie

"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message
...
"Annika1980" wrote in message
...
Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of
course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution
(3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes

Another fine shot, sharp shot.

On 13 Jul 2004 04:20:47 GMT, (Annika1980) wrote:

Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution (3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

Well, now we'll have to kill you, for you have defied the conspiracy
we Canon users have against posting full-size images.
It's a shame, too, as you do some nice pics.
Leave your front door unlocked to make it easier, OK?

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

Too little, too late.

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes



Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

"Arte Phacting" wrote in message
...
that's one mean set of bugs

Some of which can be quite colorful up close:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bvdwolf/temp/A...urbitina_M.jpg
The critter was only sized 5 mm in real life, hanging from the door knob.

By the way, that was a crop from my G3 point and shoot, using a reversed SLR
lens as close-up lens. The image was cropped and downsized a bit to reduce
bandwidth requirements for dial-up connections.

Bart

it's to be hoped that a wide angled lens didn't take these

Artie

"Big Bill" wrote in message
news
On 13 Jul 2004 04:20:47 GMT, (Annika1980) wrote:

Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution
(3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

Well, now we'll have to kill you, for you have defied the conspiracy
we Canon users have against posting full-size images.
It's a shame, too, as you do some nice pics.
Leave your front door unlocked to make it easier, OK?

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

Too little, too late.

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes



Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Annika1980 wrote:

Here's a couple of shots that I took tonight ..... handheld, of course.

The first one is at the Totally Digital D60's native resolution (3072x2048 =
6.3MP).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31283965/original

The next one is an actual-sized crop (to save bandwidth).
http://www.pbase.com/image/31284550/original

1/200, f/16, ISO 100, 550EX, 28-135 IS w/extension tubes


Hello

A difficult shot to do, but it is overexposed and a little bit out of
focus. There is not much you can do except to take many exposures.
The focus leeway is in millimetres. A really steady hand is essential. A
shot like that could be done with a tripod and a focussing rail.

I assume you used TTL flash. The problem is that it sees the background
and attempts to expose for that, with the consequence that the
foreground is overexposed. It also makes a daylight scene look like
night.It is because you are too close. It is a trade off.
Try a underexposure of 1 stop with shots like this. That will make the
background even darker unless you can get some light on to it.

Mike Engles

that is a bit of a beastie for sure

I like your creative approach by reversing the lens

It seems a brilliant idea

Artie

"Bart van der Wolf" wrote in message
...

"Arte Phacting" wrote in message
...
that's one mean set of bugs

Some of which can be quite colorful up close:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bvdwolf/temp/A...urbitina_M.jpg
The critter was only sized 5 mm in real life, hanging from the door knob.

By the way, that was a crop from my G3 point and shoot, using a reversed
SLR
lens as close-up lens. The image was cropped and downsized a bit to reduce
bandwidth requirements for dial-up connections.

Bart

that is a bit of a beastie for sure

I like your creative approach by reversing the lens

It seems a brilliant idea

Artie

"Bart van der Wolf" wrote in message
...

"Arte Phacting" wrote in message
...
that's one mean set of bugs

Some of which can be quite colorful up close:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bvdwolf/temp/A...urbitina_M.jpg
The critter was only sized 5 mm in real life, hanging from the door knob.

By the way, that was a crop from my G3 point and shoot, using a reversed
SLR
lens as close-up lens. The image was cropped and downsized a bit to reduce
bandwidth requirements for dial-up connections.

Bart