|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
July 11th 04, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
for the SLR-snobs
In article ,
NVALID says... In article , (Mike Henley) wrote: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp So? People should use whatever tools get them the results they want. Even Photoshop? 
|
|
#4
July 11th 04, 02:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
In article ,
Brian C. Baird wrote: In article , NVALID says... In article , (Mike Henley) wrote: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp So? People should use whatever tools get them the results they want. Even Photoshop? Even Photoshop. (Is this some sort of trick question?)
|
|
#5
July 11th 04, 02:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
In article ,
Brian C. Baird wrote: In article , NVALID says... In article , (Mike Henley) wrote: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp So? People should use whatever tools get them the results they want. Even Photoshop? Even Photoshop. (Is this some sort of trick question?)
|
|
#6
July 11th 04, 04:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
(Mike Henley) wrote in
om: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp The nature of this post (subject alone) is inherently trollish. It shows your lack of photography experience. -- "Live fast. Die young." (Nikki Sixx) -Richard Cockburn
|
|
#7
July 11th 04, 04:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
(Mike Henley) wrote in
om: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp The nature of this post (subject alone) is inherently trollish. It shows your lack of photography experience. -- "Live fast. Die young." (Nikki Sixx) -Richard Cockburn
|
|
#8
July 11th 04, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
Hi!
http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp The nature of this post (subject alone) is inherently trollish. It shows your lack of photography experience. Without judging the intend of the original post, let me say: * The story behind the first link (evenso promotional for a Olympus) is interesting and OT. * It goes to show, that small digital cameras today are absolutely capable of producing press-level quality image material. Having sayed this, I have my doubts for the 8 bit + jpg limitations in the dark areas, but... * It also goes to show that different approaches to photography require different equipment. * Some of the shots clearly rely on action or situation more than on image quality. Some example shots, however, are low-light situations in apparent good qulaity. A small digicam would not render them in the way they appear on the linked sites (but likely over-expose them). So if these pics are from a consumer-level small camera, there is serious "photoshopping" going on. my 2 cents, B.
|
|
#9
July 11th 04, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
Hi!
http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp The nature of this post (subject alone) is inherently trollish. It shows your lack of photography experience. Without judging the intend of the original post, let me say: * The story behind the first link (evenso promotional for a Olympus) is interesting and OT. * It goes to show, that small digital cameras today are absolutely capable of producing press-level quality image material. Having sayed this, I have my doubts for the 8 bit + jpg limitations in the dark areas, but... * It also goes to show that different approaches to photography require different equipment. * Some of the shots clearly rely on action or situation more than on image quality. Some example shots, however, are low-light situations in apparent good qulaity. A small digicam would not render them in the way they appear on the linked sites (but likely over-expose them). So if these pics are from a consumer-level small camera, there is serious "photoshopping" going on. my 2 cents, B.
|
|
#10
July 11th 04, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the SLR-snobs
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:34:55 GMT, Brian C. Baird
wrote: In article , says... In article , (Mike Henley) wrote: http://www.apple.com/pro/photo/majoli/ http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_se...majoli_bio.asp So? People should use whatever tools get them the results they want. Even Photoshop? I'm guessing you're meaning editing to create a "fake" photograph... if so then depending on the context and usage, yes... if presented as a real un-edited un-doctored photograph, then no (obviously I'd not including things such as croping/colour/levels as not allowed.) it should contain only thoes artificats as were present in the original view finder on that one single shot. -- Jonathan Wilson. www.somethingerotic.com
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
