A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EOS 10D and 1D Mark II



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old July 14th 04, 09:32 PM
marlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default EOS 10D and 1D Mark II

We are talking about different charts. I'm talking about the one at the
BOTTOM of http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmasd10/page13.asp
Richard
"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
m...
"marlin" wrote in message

. ..
"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
Nothing changes. The graphed charts are simple standard deviation
depictions.
Canon's aggressive NR just smears noise into lower frequency blobs,
this lowers standard dev after the shutter closes, but more
importantly it dramatically lowers the purity of the signal.


Let's forget about noise for a second.


Not easy when that is the point of the chart.

Do you not see that the colors also
go way off?


No. The Canon images aren't even gray anymore at high ISOs, they're
distinctly purple/green...

http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original

And Canon color rendition is consistently too red, you can see it here
too, the Foveon colors are closer...

http://www.pbase.com/canon10d_sigmasd9

...but how could they not be more accurate when Foveon colors are
actually sensed?



  #42  
Old July 14th 04, 09:32 PM
marlin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default EOS 10D and 1D Mark II

We are talking about different charts. I'm talking about the one at the
BOTTOM of http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sigmasd10/page13.asp
Richard
"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
m...
"marlin" wrote in message

. ..
"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
Nothing changes. The graphed charts are simple standard deviation
depictions.
Canon's aggressive NR just smears noise into lower frequency blobs,
this lowers standard dev after the shutter closes, but more
importantly it dramatically lowers the purity of the signal.


Let's forget about noise for a second.


Not easy when that is the point of the chart.

Do you not see that the colors also
go way off?


No. The Canon images aren't even gray anymore at high ISOs, they're
distinctly purple/green...

http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original

And Canon color rendition is consistently too red, you can see it here
too, the Foveon colors are closer...

http://www.pbase.com/canon10d_sigmasd9

...but how could they not be more accurate when Foveon colors are
actually sensed?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.