A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 19th 09, 06:28 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Alfred Molon[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,591
Default 24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.

In article , David J
Taylor says...

The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer processing.
All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles per mm (or
whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to measure the MTF in the
same spatial units, but it doesn't matter what those spatial units are.


The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you consider
it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA filter, the lens
and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high frequency content.
--

Alfred Molon
------------------------
Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0, E30 and E3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
  #22  
Old February 19th 09, 06:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
David J Taylor[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default 24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.

Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J
Taylor says...

The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer
processing. All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles
per mm (or whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to
measure the MTF in the same spatial units, but it doesn't matter
what those spatial units are.


The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you
consider it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA
filter, the lens and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high
frequency content.


If you want to know the overall performance of the system, all the
components must be taken into account. Changes in the MTF before and
after the sensor can have distinctly different effects on the image,
though. I'm thinking aliasing here.

Cheers,
David

  #23  
Old February 19th 09, 09:11 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default 24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.

Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J
Taylor says...

The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer processing.
All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles per mm (or
whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to measure the MTF in the
same spatial units, but it doesn't matter what those spatial units are.


The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you consider
it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA filter, the lens
and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high frequency content.


He didn't say different. He just said the choice of units does not
matter (as long as you are consistent).


--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff. Rich[_6_] Digital Photography 20 February 19th 09 09:11 PM
TV screens big versus Small LCD versus Plasma. Little Green Eyed Dragon Digital Photography 0 March 2nd 07 08:04 PM
OPTICAL Zoom versus megapixels Joan Digital Photography 4 May 6th 06 03:06 PM
Megapixels versus Quality Never Enough Money Digital Photography 37 February 9th 06 07:26 AM
A Serious question on enlarging 120 (6x6) negs. Diff enlargers and diff results! Martin Jangowski In The Darkroom 9 July 25th 04 12:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.