If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.
In article , David J
Taylor says... The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer processing. All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles per mm (or whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to measure the MTF in the same spatial units, but it doesn't matter what those spatial units are. The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you consider it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA filter, the lens and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high frequency content. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0, E30 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J Taylor says... The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer processing. All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles per mm (or whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to measure the MTF in the same spatial units, but it doesn't matter what those spatial units are. The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you consider it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA filter, the lens and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high frequency content. If you want to know the overall performance of the system, all the components must be taken into account. Changes in the MTF before and after the sensor can have distinctly different effects on the image, though. I'm thinking aliasing here. Cheers, David |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff.
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , David J Taylor says... The sensor, filter and lens all have an MTF, as does the Bayer processing. All the same - the transfer function at a certain cycles per mm (or whatever unit you choose). Of course, you need to measure the MTF in the same spatial units, but it doesn't matter what those spatial units are. The sensor is a discrete sampler and for practical purposes you consider it the source of the signal. All other things, the AA filter, the lens and Bayer interpolation have an impact on the high frequency content. He didn't say different. He just said the choice of units does not matter (as long as you are consistent). -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
24 megapixels versus 12, substantial diff. | Rich[_6_] | Digital Photography | 20 | February 19th 09 09:11 PM |
TV screens big versus Small LCD versus Plasma. | Little Green Eyed Dragon | Digital Photography | 0 | March 2nd 07 08:04 PM |
OPTICAL Zoom versus megapixels | Joan | Digital Photography | 4 | May 6th 06 03:06 PM |
Megapixels versus Quality | Never Enough Money | Digital Photography | 37 | February 9th 06 07:26 AM |
A Serious question on enlarging 120 (6x6) negs. Diff enlargers and diff results! | Martin Jangowski | In The Darkroom | 9 | July 25th 04 12:57 AM |