[ZLR] Nikon Coolpix 8800 with VR built in

"Chuck" writes:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

That is only a 3 megapixel camera. The 8800 is an 8 megapixel camera.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

true

"Jim Townsend" a écrit dans le message de
...
Chuck wrote:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

Canon had a 10X zoom IS back in Jan 2001 :-)

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/spec...anon_pro90.asp

Panasonic is not and he was comparing it to the Panasonic.
(Which has a 12x lense , not a 10x , and also , f2.8 all the way)

He was also comparing it to the Minolta, which only has a 7X lense.

Who cares about the 8 MP anyway. What we want is a 10x with VR. 5 or 6 Mp
would be enough for me.
Also, it cant go higher than 400 iso


"Woodchuck Bill" a écrit dans le message de
...
Jim Townsend wrote in
:

Chuck wrote:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

Canon had a 10X zoom IS back in Jan 2001 :-)

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/spec...anon_pro90.asp




Were either of these 8 megapixel like the Nikon?

This might be time for me to upgrade from my 5700.

--
Bill

Panasonic is not and he was comparing it to the Panasonic.
(Which has a 12x lense , not a 10x , and also , f2.8 all the way)

He was also comparing it to the Minolta, which only has a 7X lense.

Who cares about the 8 MP anyway. What we want is a 10x with VR. 5 or 6 Mp
would be enough for me.
Also, it cant go higher than 400 iso


"Woodchuck Bill" a écrit dans le message de
...
Jim Townsend wrote in
:

Chuck wrote:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

Canon had a 10X zoom IS back in Jan 2001 :-)

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/spec...anon_pro90.asp




Were either of these 8 megapixel like the Nikon?

This might be time for me to upgrade from my 5700.

--
Bill

neither the Panasonic or the Minolta is a 8mp anyway


"Michael Meissner" a écrit dans le message de
...
"Chuck" writes:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

That is only a 3 megapixel camera. The 8800 is an 8 megapixel camera.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

neither the Panasonic or the Minolta is a 8mp anyway


"Michael Meissner" a écrit dans le message de
...
"Chuck" writes:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

That is only a 3 megapixel camera. The 8800 is an 8 megapixel camera.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

neither the Panasonic or the Minolta is a 8mp anyway


"Michael Meissner" a écrit dans le message de
...
"Chuck" writes:

(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

That is only a 3 megapixel camera. The 8800 is an 8 megapixel camera.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

"Chuck" writes:

neither the Panasonic or the Minolta is a 8mp anyway

The Minolta A2 and A200 are both 8 megapixels. True the Minolta 7D is 'only' 6
megapixels, but I would imagine DSLR pixels are a lot less noiser than the
current 8 megapixel cameras.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

"Chuck" writes:

neither the Panasonic or the Minolta is a 8mp anyway

The Minolta A2 and A200 are both 8 megapixels. True the Minolta 7D is 'only' 6
megapixels, but I would imagine DSLR pixels are a lot less noiser than the
current 8 megapixel cameras.

--
Michael Meissner
email:
http://www.the-meissners.org

Chuck wrote:
(okay somebody has to react to K-M and Panasonic).

Canon has a 10x IS since 03/2004 .

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons1is/

But at 3MP not 8MP.