If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the
A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Is it worth the extra money, considering I will be printing at A4 size? Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? Is it always best, quality-wise, to shoot at the highest resolution, regardless of print size? Thank-you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
I bought a Sony W5 my first digital, but now after experiencing
cropping I should have gotten the w7. Im not trying to steer you to sony Canon is good , just that cropping often makes several better shots for me out of one shot. For the very small price increase get more mp, you may benefit at times. You may also find you want larger photos of your best. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
spo writes:
I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Shop a little more, the difference is usually larger than that, so the places you're looking may be charging too much for the A610. Is it worth the extra money, considering I will be printing at A4 size? Hard to say. I'm personally more likely to buy an A610. Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? It might in some situations. It might be worse in others. The cameras have the same sized ccd's, so the photosites (individual pixels) on the A620 are smaller, giving reduced dynamic range and possibly higher susceptability to noise. There's a test report on the A620 at dpreview.com and some of us are waiting for a report on the A610 so we can compare them. Is it always best, quality-wise, to shoot at the highest resolution, regardless of print size? Hmm, if you don't mind the bigger files on the flash card, and possible slower handling, then probably. There are possible exceptions that apply to some other cameras but I think not to the A610/620. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:49:59 GMT, spo wrote:
I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Is it worth the extra money, considering I will be printing at A4 size? Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? Is it always best, quality-wise, to shoot at the highest resolution, regardless of print size? Thank-you. Don't know if this difference is of any importance to you or not but I thought it worth mentioning. The A620 supports remote control/capture via USB & the A610 does not. Why Canon opted to leave this feature out on the A610 is probably for marketing reasons. Surprisingly the A620 seems to compare reasonably well with the A610 in noise levels in spite of both using the same physical size sensor. Look @ the pictures for yourself: A610: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html A620: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html They both use Canon's Digic II processor so it may be programmed to do more in camera image noise reduction processing on the A620, if so, it seems to do it rather well. It's a difficult call between the 2 but 5MP is generally enough unless you need to do a considerable amount of cropping. Best of luck, hope this information helps some. Respectfully, DHB "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
Paul Rubin wrote:
spo writes: I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Shop a little more, the difference is usually larger than that, so the places you're looking may be charging too much for the A610. Well, I've already done a great deal of online window-shopping. Amazon UK is the lowest-priced reputable seller of the Canon A610, and their own price for the A620 is only around £27 more, though there's a couple of weeks waiting time. http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...817432-8855668 http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/...817432-8855668 Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? It might in some situations. It might be worse in others. The cameras have the same sized ccd's, so the photosites (individual pixels) on the A620 are smaller, giving reduced dynamic range and possibly higher susceptability to noise. There's a test report on the A620 at dpreview.com and some of us are waiting for a report on the A610 so we can compare them. Yes I've read the reviews at dpreview and Steve's-digicams. A Google for 'Canon A610 (or A620) sample images' brings up lots more photos too, but on screen I can't discern any difference. Thanks Paul. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
DHB wrote:
Don't know if this difference is of any importance to you or not but I thought it worth mentioning. The A620 supports remote control/capture via USB & the A610 does not. This is something I've not thought about at all, and I'm not sure if I'll ever need the feature - it'd be nice to have though, and would give me more options. What other gear is required? Surprisingly the A620 seems to compare reasonably well with the A610 in noise levels in spite of both using the same physical size sensor. Look @ the pictures for yourself: A610: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html A620: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html Yes I've seen all the sample images but can't tell the cameras apart. I didn't know about this noise issue though, so I'll look into it. Thanks DHB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
Im not sure about other differences but I think the a620 has better control
over noise due to the 7mp sensor which youd think would be the opposite.but I think the a95 was worse in this respect "spo" wrote in message ... I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Is it worth the extra money, considering I will be printing at A4 size? Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? Is it always best, quality-wise, to shoot at the highest resolution, regardless of print size? Thank-you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:24:20 GMT, spo wrote:
DHB wrote: Don't know if this difference is of any importance to you or not but I thought it worth mentioning. The A620 supports remote control/capture via USB & the A610 does not. This is something I've not thought about at all, and I'm not sure if I'll ever need the feature - it'd be nice to have though, and would give me more options. What other gear is required? Surprisingly the A620 seems to compare reasonably well with the A610 in noise levels in spite of both using the same physical size sensor. Look @ the pictures for yourself: A610: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html A620: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...0_samples.html Yes I've seen all the sample images but can't tell the cameras apart. I didn't know about this noise issue though, so I'll look into it. Thanks DHB spo, click on the above link & you will see the included software described that Canon provides that will operate the A620 remotely. Also there is at least 1 other company that makes a better version of remote control/capture software for many Canon cameras & some other brands also. Here is a link to 1 such company: http://www.breezesys.com/ This is not a feature most people will ever use, but it's nice to know that the option is there for the future. Suppose later on you buy a newer camera or a DSLR, you may want to use the A610 mounted in a weatherproof container, placed in the back yard, aimed @ a bird feeder or any food source that may attract a critter(S) that you want a nice close up picture of. Now you can sit in the comfort of your house & remotely take some incredible pictures from your PC or notebook. The weather won't be of concern to you as you will be indoors. Like I said this is not for everybody but I thought it worth mentioning for those who might want this feature & may not have know that the A620 has it but not the A610. Also there are ways around the 15 foot USB cable limitation too. Best of luck, hope this helps some with this difficult choice. Respectfully, DHB "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
The last time I posted a reply to a similar question I thought price
difference was $100. If it's a lot less than that, the I would opt for the 7mp. Either one gives excellent results. I have an A95. I read about noise, purple fringing but darned if I can see what people are talking about. I can't see any difference between fine and superfine either. I rarely change the iso, the noise comment is based on normal shooting modes. Dave Cohen "Philip S" wrote in message ... Im not sure about other differences but I think the a620 has better control over noise due to the 7mp sensor which youd think would be the opposite.but I think the a95 was worse in this respect "spo" wrote in message ... I'm puzzling over which camera to buy.. the Canon A610 (5mp), or the A620. I can get the A620 (7mp) for around £27 more. Is it worth the extra money, considering I will be printing at A4 size? Will the 7mp camera give noticeably better results at A4 than the 5mp one? Is it always best, quality-wise, to shoot at the highest resolution, regardless of print size? Thank-you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Dumb questions
Dave Cohen wrote:
The last time I posted a reply to a similar question I thought price difference was $100. If it's a lot less than that, the I would opt for the 7mp. Either one gives excellent results. I have an A95. I read about noise, purple fringing but darned if I can see what people are talking about. I can't see any difference between fine and superfine either. I rarely change the iso, the noise comment is based on normal shooting modes. Dave Cohen 100 dollar difference? Hmm, I think that's about £60? Right, I've decided to get the A620 even though I can't really afford it. An old friend of mine, now deceased, used to say "Long after the price is forgotten, the quality remains". I'll go with that. Thanks to you all for helping me make my decision. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Questions on Canon 300D and etc. questions regarding digital photography | David J Taylor | Digital Photography | 10 | March 24th 05 05:18 PM |
Questions on Canon 300D and etc. questions regarding digital photography | Progressiveabsolution | Digital Photography | 4 | March 24th 05 04:11 PM |
Questions on Canon 300D and etc. questions regarding digitalphotography | Matt Ion | Digital Photography | 3 | March 24th 05 02:57 PM |
Greetings, plus some questions (long) | Dieter Zakas | In The Darkroom | 45 | November 3rd 04 04:55 PM |
Dumb, dumb dumb Qestion | David Napierkowski | Digital Photography | 2 | October 30th 04 09:43 PM |