7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
....K?

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

On 2014-09-29 16:39:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!

https://db.tt/Ce36Vp6h

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014092910280855176-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:39:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!

https://db.tt/Ce36Vp6h

I guess that I shouldn't have shared that information... ;-p
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

On 2014-09-29 17:37:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092910280855176-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:39:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or "queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!

https://db.tt/Ce36Vp6h

I guess that I shouldn't have shared that information... ;-p

....but things are looking up.
https://db.tt/P3f1I6ar

--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2014092910391295370-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 17:37:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092910280855176-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:39:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have
proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or
"queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!

https://db.tt/Ce36Vp6h

I guess that I shouldn't have shared that information... ;-p

...but things are looking up.
https://db.tt/P3f1I6ar

You did understand that I referred to the trash? Maybe it seems like a
detour but emptying it now feels sooo good...
--
teleportation kills
http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography

On 2014-09-29 18:42:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092910391295370-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 17:37:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092910280855176-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:39:27 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092909132645322-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 16:09:01 +0000, android said:

In article 2014092908020495223-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2014-09-29 14:10:19 +0000, android said:

In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

android wrote:
In article ,
(Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:

Another way to spell make do...

More of your "creative" style of spelling?

Que?

Ad Hock spelling!

I had that one corrected, thanks for pointing that out. You have
proven
that you don't know the meaning of it though. Spling aside! ;-p
Thank U for recognizing me creativity! :-))

Perhaps a clue was needed to show that "¿que?" is not "cue" or
"queue".
...K?

I English that first ? thingy is optional. Que is on loan from the
Spanish the same way Ad Hoc is on loan from the Latin... ;-p

Get a life1

https://db.tt/gjBql5bJ

I have a special folder in my dock for those... Drag 'n drop!

https://db.tt/Ce36Vp6h

I guess that I shouldn't have shared that information... ;-p

...but things are looking up.
https://db.tt/P3f1I6ar

You did understand that I referred to the trash? Maybe it seems like a
detour but emptying it now feels sooo good...

We are here to serve & entertain.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On Mon, 29 Sep 2014 03:08:24 -0700 (PDT), Whisky-dave
wrote:

... why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon?


As *good* as Nikon?


.... why can't Canon handle image noise as *well* as Nikon?

If you are really picky:

.... why can't Canon handle image noise as *well* as does Nikon?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens