If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 15:42:01 UTC+1, android wrote: In article , Whisky-dave wrote: On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 09:44:30 UTC+1, Sandman wrote: In article , android wrote: In article , Sandman: I really do know, as opposed to you. android: It's some Canon, right? ;-p Sandman: Nope. Not??? Do you care to enlighten us? I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very specific Canon. Well here's your post exactly what specific canon are you refering to. But you'll wriggle around yet again ... ---------------------------------------- Sandman Sep 21 In article , android wrote: http://www.imaging-resource.com has got a "Beta" of the 7D2 and posted jpegs of their test targets in their camera "comperometer". Here's a screen capture of the 7D2 vs the D7100 at ISO 6400... The Canon's on the left: http://tinyurl.com/mhpwv5m I'm a RAW kind of guy but it's a preview. "Half frame" fanatics should be ecstatic! Yeah, like I said - the 7D is trounced by the D7100, and you wanted to compare it to the D750, where it would be obliterated. ISO6400 is Max ISO for the D7100 and the 7D goes one step further, yet at 6400 the 7D doesn't really look that much better. A pity, why can't Canon handle image noise as good as Nikon? I'm not W Dave... He's not I am. Good to know... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , Whisky-dave wrote:
Sandman: I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very specific Canon. Well here's your post exactly what specific canon are you refering to. But you'll wriggle around yet again ... I explained that on 21 of september, Dave. Here are all the posts you've made since my explanation where you still don't understand: 01: 2014-09-22 02: 2014-09-22 03: 2014-09-22 04: 2014-09-23 05: 2014-09-23 06: 2014-09-24 07: 2014-09-24 08: 2014-09-25 09: 2014-09-25 10: 2014-09-26 11: 2014-09-26 12: 2014-09-26 13: 2014-09-29 14: 2014-10-01 15: 2014-10-01 -- Sandman[.net] |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
In article , android: In article , Sandman: I really do know, as opposed to you. android: It's some Canon, right? ;-p Sandman: Nope. android: Not??? Do you care to enlighten us? Sandman: I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very specific Canon. Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears everything up neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously. You're soo padded cell material! So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st either? You and drunk Dave are in the padded cell together, mayhaps? -- Sandman[.net] |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
In article , Sandman wrote: In article , Whisky-dave wrote: Sandman: I really do know, as opposed to you. snip quote of me knowing what I'm talking about Let's repeat, here is where I explained myself: Sandman 7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400 09/21/2014 "It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant things instead of staying focused on facts, Android." That's on 21 of september, these are the posts you posted where you're still confused: I'm not W Dave... Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again? -- Sandman[.net] |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: In article , android wrote: In article , android: In article , Sandman: I really do know, as opposed to you. android: It's some Canon, right? ;-p Sandman: Nope. android: Not??? Do you care to enlighten us? Sandman: I already have, a week past. It's not "some" Canon, it's a very specific Canon. Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears everything up neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously. You're soo padded cell material! So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st either? For the record: In article , android wrote: In article , Sandman wrote: Why can't you read? The 7D is *slightly* better The thread is still about the 7D2 and D7100. Not the 7D and whatever... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: "It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant things instead of staying focused on facts, Android." --- I'm not W Dave... Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again? You're a silly old fart... -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
android: Ahh... You're talking 'bout 7d and not 7d! That clears everything up neatly. Not the 1dx or something, obviously. You're soo padded cell material! Sandman: So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st either? For the record: A simple "No, English is way too hard for me" would have sufficed. -- Sandman[.net] |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , Whisky-dave wrote:
Sandman: So, you didn't understand the plain english post I made on september 21st either? You and drunk Dave are in the padded cell together, mayhaps? It takes someone or incredible stuipidity to not understand what plain English is when others point it out and they still don't get it. Indeed - and here you are, being incredibly stupid. Well done sandman Thank you. I aim to please. -- Sandman[.net] |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article , android wrote:
In article , Sandman: "It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant things instead of staying focused on facts, Android." android: I'm not W Dave... Sandman: Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again? You're a silly old fart... Why can't you answer the question? -- Sandman[.net] |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
7D2 vs D7100 @ 6400
In article ,
Sandman wrote: In article , android wrote: In article , Sandman: "It's all you've got, troll. I've been talking about the Mark II the entire time. I just think Canon's naming scheme is stupid. It's the new version of the 7D. Focus on irrelevant things instead of staying focused on facts, Android." android: I'm not W Dave... Sandman: Who said you were? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again? You're a silly old fart... Why can't you answer the question? Showcasing your poor reading comprehension again? -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon new release D7100 | Rob | Digital Photography | 159 | March 15th 13 11:09 AM |
6400 on the D3? How about 12,800 on a little P&S? | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | January 24th 08 08:29 PM |