If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"False" color using DCRAW??
Hi everybody,
I shooted many picture with my Nikon D50 in raw format. I elaborated these with some software and in particular with dcraw (that i suggest to you). But I have a problem. The output colors produced by dcraw are different if I use the flag "-e" (to make a "thumbnail") when I I don't use this flag. Can you explain me why? (I'm a rookie). And can you explain how I can shot picture with a embeded profile? For help you, I use dcraw with this sintax "dcraw -v -w -p embed -T my file.nef" and this is the output: "Loading NIKON D50 image from my file.NEF ... Scaling with black 0, multipliers 2.073930 1.000000 1.490272 1.000000 AHD interpolation... my file has no embedded profile. Converting to sRGB colorspace... Writing data to my file.tiff ..." Thanks in advance for you suggestion. Bye!! AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"False" color using DCRAW??
On Sep 19, 7:32 pm, Teckman wrote:
Hi everybody, I shooted many picture with my Nikon D50 in raw format. I elaborated these with some software and in particular with dcraw (that i suggest to you). But I have a problem. The output colors produced by dcraw are different if I use the flag "-e" (to make a "thumbnail") when I I don't use this flag. Can you explain me why? (I'm a rookie). Hello. What dcraw -e does is to extract a thumbnail already embedded into the raw file by the camera. That is, when you take a shot and you have the camera set to raw, the camera saves not only the raw data but also prepares a complete jpeg file and saves it inside the raw file. dcraw -e doesn't convert the raw data but simply extracts this already- existing jpeg and saves it separately. The jpeg rendering produced by the camera does take into account white balance, sharpening, contrast etc settings. If you use dcraw to convert the raw data, it ignores these (except white balance, which however is interpreted slightly differently by dcraw than by the camera). This is why you get different colours, contrast and so on if you use -e. I don't understand the last part of your question, And can you explain how I can shot picture with a embeded profile? can you please explain it again so I can try to help? eg what do you mean here by profile? For help you, I use dcraw with this sintax "dcraw -v -w -p embed -T my file.nef" and this is the output: "Loading NIKON D50 image from my file.NEF ... Scaling with black 0, multipliers 2.073930 1.000000 1.490272 1.000000 AHD interpolation... my file has no embedded profile. Converting to sRGB colorspace... Writing data to my file.tiff ..." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"False" color using DCRAW??
On 19 Set, 19:53, acl wrote:
On Sep 19, 7:32 pm, Teckman wrote: Hi everybody, I shooted many picture with my Nikon D50 in raw format. I elaborated these with some software and in particular with dcraw (that i suggest to you). But I have a problem. The output colors produced by dcraw are different if I use the flag "-e" (to make a "thumbnail") when I I don't use this flag. Can you explain me why? (I'm a rookie). Hello. What dcraw -e does is to extract a thumbnail already embedded into the raw file by the camera. That is, when you take a shot and you have the camera set to raw, the camera saves not only the raw data but also prepares a complete jpeg file and saves it inside the raw file. dcraw -e doesn't convert the raw data but simply extracts this already- existing jpeg and saves it separately. The jpeg rendering produced by the camera does take into account white balance, sharpening, contrast etc settings. If you use dcraw to convert the raw data, it ignores these (except white balance, which however is interpreted slightly differently by dcraw than by the camera). This is why you get different colours, contrast and so on if you use -e. I don't understand the last part of your question, And can you explain how I can shot picture with a embeded profile? can you please explain it again so I can try to help? eg what do you mean here by profile? For help you, I use dcraw with this sintax "dcraw -v -w -p embed -T my file.nef" and this is the output: "Loading NIKON D50 image from my file.NEF ... Scaling with black 0, multipliers 2.073930 1.000000 1.490272 1.000000 AHD interpolation... my file has no embedded profile. Converting to sRGB colorspace... Writing data to my file.tiff ..."- Nascondi testo tra virgolette - - Mostra testo tra virgolette - My question is borned because if a used differert RAW renderer I obtain different color. And before start to elaborate my shoot I would undestand how obtained the "original" shoot. I suppose the original picture is which obtained by original Nikon software that is ugual at the picture obtain with flag "-e" (about color only). Probably my right question is: "Which are the right flags just to force DCRAW to renderer the picture how was shooted?". Thanks for you previous answer (was quick and helpfull). Bye. AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"False" color using DCRAW??
On Sep 20, 3:18 pm, Teckman wrote:
My question is borned because if a used differert RAW renderer I obtain different color. And before start to elaborate my shoot I would undestand how obtained the "original" shoot. I suppose the original picture is which obtained by original Nikon software that is ugual at the picture obtain with flag "-e" (about color only). Probably my right question is: "Which are the right flags just to force DCRAW to renderer the picture how was shooted?". OK now I see. Well, the jpeg produced by the camera is one way of rendering it. If you like it, the closest is probably by Nikon software (Nikon capture, View NX which is free, etc-not in Linux, though), which does take into account the various choices you made in camera regarding sharpening, contrast etc. Other converters render things differently (most do a lot more than just interpolating) and, as far as I know, all ignore these settings. So there's no easy answer to your question (probably there's no answer). You'll have to either process the file afterwards in Gimp/ photoshop (say), or switch to a different converter. If you're on windows (or mac), try nikon view nx, it's free and does a good job. Thanks for you previous answer (was quick and helpfull). Bye. AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"False" color using DCRAW??
acl wrote:
On Sep 20, 3:18 pm, Teckman wrote: My question is borned because if a used differert RAW renderer I obtain different color. And before start to elaborate my shoot I would undestand how obtained the "original" shoot. I suppose the original picture is which obtained by original Nikon software that is ugual at the picture obtain with flag "-e" (about color only). Probably my right question is: "Which are the right flags just to force DCRAW to renderer the picture how was shooted?". OK now I see. Well, the jpeg produced by the camera is one way of rendering it. If you like it, the closest is probably by Nikon software (Nikon capture, View NX which is free, etc-not in Linux, though), which does take into account the various choices you made in camera regarding sharpening, contrast etc. Other converters render things differently (most do a lot more than just interpolating) and, as far as I know, all ignore these settings. So there's no easy answer to your question (probably there's no answer). You'll have to either process the file afterwards in Gimp/ photoshop (say), or switch to a different converter. If you're on windows (or mac), try nikon view nx, it's free and does a good job. Use UFRAW, which is a configurable GUI/batch front end for dcraw. To include sharpening, USM, or whatever, it can be post-processed with ImageMagick's "convert" program if batch mode is needed. With UFRAW it is fairly easy to duplicate the camera defaults. The configuration can be saved and UFRAW can then be invoked, for example in batch mode, using that configuration. The only catch is that... well to be honest it won't take long before discarding the idea that a camera produced JPEG is the "original" by default. Nikon of course goes to a lot of effort to select defaults that will at least be pleasant to most people, but there is never anything nearly as good as a personal touch to make an image look exactly the way the photographer thinks it should look. Thanks for you previous answer (was quick and helpfull). Bye. AM. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
We sell and supply Brand New Unlocked Nokia phones"""" | Marc[_2_] | Digital Photography | 1 | June 22nd 07 09:48 AM |
Do other cameras have built-in feature similar to "Color accent" scene in some Canon DCs? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 15 | June 1st 07 01:55 PM |
"Friends are born, not made." !!!! By: "Henry Brooks Adams" | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | February 1st 07 02:25 PM |
How to insert the "modified time" attribute in "date taken" attrib in batch mode | ashjas | Digital Photography | 4 | November 8th 06 09:00 PM |