If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
150mm G Claron
The official Schneider quote for the image circle is around 180mm at
infinity and f22. It said by some this is a conservative figure. Also how good would the lens be at apertures wider than f22 around infinity? I normally use f16, f22 and smaller anyway but am curious about the efect on the edges of the image. My camera is a 4x5 Crown Graphic which doesnt have mega movements. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
150mm G Claron
The design of all the G Clarons is such that the image circle continues to
increase as the aperture is stopped down. As you probably know, G Clarons are optimized for 1:1 but Schneider says they work well as general purpose lenses if stopped down to F22 or smaller. So I've never used mine at anything wider than F22 but at that aperture and smaller the 150 covers 4x5 with room for movement, the room increases as you stop down below F22, and the edges are fine. I've owned three G Clarons, the 150, the 210 (which I use for 8x10), and the 240 (which I also use for 8x10). All have been excellent lenses and great for backpacking since they're so small. "Neil Purling" wrote in message ... The official Schneider quote for the image circle is around 180mm at infinity and f22. It said by some this is a conservative figure. Also how good would the lens be at apertures wider than f22 around infinity? I normally use f16, f22 and smaller anyway but am curious about the efect on the edges of the image. My camera is a 4x5 Crown Graphic which doesnt have mega movements. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
150mm G Claron
"Neil Purling" wrote in message ... The official Schneider quote for the image circle is around 180mm at infinity and f22. It said by some this is a conservative figure. Also how good would the lens be at apertures wider than f22 around infinity? I normally use f16, f22 and smaller anyway but am curious about the efect on the edges of the image. My camera is a 4x5 Crown Graphic which doesnt have mega movements. Schneider has pretty complete data for this lens on its web site at http://www.schneideroptics.com. There it states that the lens can be used for infinity focus at f/22 or smaller and that it will cover 64 degrees without vignetting at f/16 or smaller. This is equivalent to 187mm for a 150mm lens at infinity focus. This is a Plasmat type lens. Plasmats have very good corrections especially for astigmatism. Most lenses that increase coverage as they are stopped down do so because they have a considerable amount of uncorrected spherical aberration, which is proportional to the stop. A Dagor is such a lens. Its coverage is about 60 degrees wide open increasing to around 87 degrees (claimed) at f/45. The better corrected a lens is the less its coverage will increase with stopping down. The G-Claron is a very well corrected lens. The main advantage of stopping down is to eliminate vignetting by the lens mount. Unless a lens is especially designed to be used wide open it will probably mechanically vignette until stopped down about 2 stops, that is, until the size of the aperture is about half its wide open value. This varies with the lens. As one moves further out in the field the aperture needed to avoid vignetting becomes smaller so there is no fixed value for this. In any case, it looks like the maximum coverage of the G-Claron is not very much larger than its wide open coverage. 187mm is enough to exceed the movements available on a Speed or Crown Graphic. As far as the image conjugates are concerned, a lens can have simultaneous correction for spherical aberration, coma, and astigmatism at only one object distance. This is chosen by the designer according to the application for the lens. Copy and reproduction (process) lenses are generally optimised at 1:1 magnification which is equivalent to an object distance equal to the image distance or twice the focal length. General purpose camera lenses are optimised for infinity focus (actually more often for around 20 to 50 times the focal length for a better compromise for closer work). The aberration which is most often observable when a lens is used far from its optimum object distance is coma. Coma varies with the stop and is reduced by stopping down so many process lenses are quite good at infinity provided they are stopped down enough to get rid of the residual coma. For a four element lens like the Apochromatic Artar, this is around f/22 as it is evidently for the G-Claron. Four element "Dialyte" lenses, like the Artar, are relatively insensitive to object distance. I don't know about Plasmats, but, in general, the slower a lens is to begin with the less sensitive it is to variations in conjugates. This has to do with the changes in the angle with with the light rays going through the lens strike the surfaces of the elements. The narrower this angle is to begin with the less the variation. So, its greatest for high speed and wide angle lenses, least for slow, narrow coverage lenses like process lenses. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
150mm recommendation for 5x7? | Photo & Music | Large Format Photography Equipment | 9 | April 20th 04 09:09 PM |
Best Aperture for Sironar N 150mm...Also, Using Graflex Polaroid Back??? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 11 | February 29th 04 04:45 PM |
Schneider Componon-S 150mm Lens for Copy Work??? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 17 | February 21st 04 09:40 PM |
Optimum Aperture for 150mm G-Claron????? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 26 | February 21st 04 09:32 PM |
150mm G-Claron the WRONG lens for Over 25" Paintings? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 2 | February 17th 04 03:20 AM |