If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
I spent a couple of minutes trying this today. I took four photos of the
same scene, at f/8, 1/80 second, ISO 200, at 50mm. I used three Nikon lenses: 50/1.8 prime, 18-70 kit, and 17-200 VR lens with VR on and off. (All shots handheld.) I then cropped to a small area I'd focused on. The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/2088218 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
"Cynicor" wrote in message
t... I spent a couple of minutes trying this today. I took four photos of the same scene, at f/8, 1/80 second, ISO 200, at 50mm. I used three Nikon lenses: 50/1.8 prime, 18-70 kit, and 17-200 VR lens with VR on and off. (All shots handheld.) I then cropped to a small area I'd focused on. The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. If all you want to do is pixel-peep or get the sharpest images, then you only want to use primes or the best zooms. But if you want a walk-around lense that covers a good range, then the 18-200 VR is one of the best choices. No it's not the sharpest, but it is pretty good, and better than any of the competitions super zooms. And users like the wide zoom range and small size/weight for convenience over perfection. A friend of mine is a pro with some very nice glass, but he has an 18-200 VR specifically for a general walk-around lense. If he's out to make money, he uses the good stuff. But for casual shooting, the 18-200 is on the camera. I have the 18-70 on my D80, and it's a great lense. I compared it to the 17-55 f/2.8 and it's almost as good for a heck of a lot less. It's sharp enough to use wide open and it covers a wide enough zoom range for a walk-around. I also have the 50mm when I need the best image quality at that range. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
Cynicor wrote:
I spent a couple of minutes trying this today. I took four photos of the same scene, at f/8, 1/80 second, ISO 200, at 50mm. I used three Nikon lenses: 50/1.8 prime, 18-70 kit, and 17-200 VR lens with VR on and off. (All shots handheld.) I then cropped to a small area I'd focused on. The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/2088218 Life is full of trade off's. The 17-200 is a much larger range than 18-70 and it is going to be much more difficult to fully compensate for the entire zoom range. You may find that it is sharper as some settings than at others. I guess you'll just have to decide what is best for you when. -- Joseph Meehan Dia 's Muire duit |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
Cynicor wrote:
I spent a couple of minutes trying this today. I took four photos of the same scene, at f/8, 1/80 second, ISO 200, at 50mm. I used three Nikon lenses: 50/1.8 prime, 18-70 kit, and 17-200 VR lens with VR on and off. (All shots handheld.) I then cropped to a small area I'd focused on. The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. http://trupin.smugmug.com/gallery/2088218 Perhaps you need to reconsider how you did the test. 18-200 with no VR looks sharper to me than with VR on - so something doesn't seem right. Also 1/80th second is too long exposure for such a test unless on a tripod. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. Interesting. Odd that the VR-off shot is worse than the VR-on. -- Ken Tough |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
Ken Tough wrote: The prime lens is definitely sharper (as you'd expect), but the 18-70 lens was also sharper than the 17-200. I'm not as happy with the 17-200 lens's sharpness as others seem to be. Interesting. Odd that the VR-off shot is worse than the VR-on. Maybe I'm missing something, but the 18-200 VR-off looks sharper than the 18-70 shot to me. Drew |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
50mm vs 18-70 vs 17-200 lens test
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pentax and the best bokeh for the buck | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 48 | November 1st 06 03:51 PM |
What make a lens normal ? | Digital Photography | 45 | October 31st 06 09:14 PM | |
Lenses for D70 (amateur) | Reality Culture | Digital SLR Cameras | 25 | May 25th 05 02:50 PM |
FS: Schneider Large-Format Lens TRADE!!! | Bill Gillooly | General Equipment For Sale | 2 | February 20th 05 06:43 AM |
swing lens cameras and focussing distance | RolandRB | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 30 | June 21st 04 05:12 AM |