If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Martik wrote: Here is a link to the image (1st one) http://www3.telus.net/martik/ I believe it was resized from a larger original and will be printed at a lab. It won't look good, but not too bad, as long as you don't look very close, well not even a little close. Normally I would say to up-sample and then try to sharpen a bit, even with a great photo this is very limited, but what you are working with has some pretty large jpg artifacts with really limits sharpening. But a 4 x 6 print is cheap so give it a try and see what it looks like. Scott |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Martik wrote:
Here is a link to the image (1st one) http://www3.telus.net/martik/ I believe it was resized from a larger original and will be printed at a lab. They don't look bad on the screen, so you should be able to get prints that will serve the intended purpose. I take it you aren't planning to try to get them published in a car mag... -- Ron Hunter |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
It will probably look like crap. First off, there will be some cropping
or some stretching involved because 500 X 700 does not have the same aspect ration (ratio of length to width) of a 4x6. That aside, you probably need more pixels for a decent print. Maybe you could print it out smaller (not enlarged), then scan that with a scanner at a very high resolution 600-900+ dpi? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
It will probably look like crap. First off, there will be some cropping
or some stretching involved because 500 X 700 does not have the same aspect ration (ratio of length to width) of a 4x6. That aside, you probably need more pixels for a decent print. Maybe you could print it out smaller (not enlarged), then scan that with a scanner at a very high resolution 600-900+ dpi? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
It will probably look like crap. First off, there will be some cropping
or some stretching involved because 500 X 700 does not have the same aspect ration (ratio of length to width) of a 4x6. That aside, you probably need more pixels for a decent print. Maybe you could print it out smaller (not enlarged), then scan that with a scanner at a very high resolution 600-900+ dpi? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:33:40 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
Print it on 5x7 paper. The last thing it needs is to be cropped down to 466x700 to fix 4x6 paper. I was also about to suggest a size other than 4x6, because you'd lose less by picking a size with a closer aspect ratio to 5x7. My suggestion would have been to use 3 1/2x5 paper. 5 x 7 might make the lack of detail a bit too obvious, and 3 1/2 x 5 (5.0 x 7.14) is very close to 5 x 7's perfectly matched aspect ratio. Trailing far behind is 4 x 6 (5.0 x 7.5) so that size paper would waste even more of its limited detail due to trimming. Martik only asked how 4x6 would look, so either 3 1/2x5 or 5x7 might be acceptable. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:33:40 -0700, Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
Print it on 5x7 paper. The last thing it needs is to be cropped down to 466x700 to fix 4x6 paper. I was also about to suggest a size other than 4x6, because you'd lose less by picking a size with a closer aspect ratio to 5x7. My suggestion would have been to use 3 1/2x5 paper. 5 x 7 might make the lack of detail a bit too obvious, and 3 1/2 x 5 (5.0 x 7.14) is very close to 5 x 7's perfectly matched aspect ratio. Trailing far behind is 4 x 6 (5.0 x 7.5) so that size paper would waste even more of its limited detail due to trimming. Martik only asked how 4x6 would look, so either 3 1/2x5 or 5x7 might be acceptable. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Martik" wrote in message newsA44e.150753$gJ3.86805@clgrps13... I only have a 500x700 pixel image to process. How will this look on a 4x6 print? For starters, the aspect ratio will not permit printing to a 4x6 size. Next, the pixel per inch count will be quite low. You may be able to see the pixels. It is possible to help this problem with interpolation. Jim |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Martik" wrote in message newsA44e.150753$gJ3.86805@clgrps13... I only have a 500x700 pixel image to process. How will this look on a 4x6 print? For starters, the aspect ratio will not permit printing to a 4x6 size. Next, the pixel per inch count will be quite low. You may be able to see the pixels. It is possible to help this problem with interpolation. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DSLR v Consumer Image quality | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 303 | March 3rd 05 12:56 AM |
Very Long - How to Tweak the PrintFix Scanner - (Followup to another thread) | BobS | Digital Photography | 7 | January 27th 05 09:32 PM |
Top photographers condemn digital age | DM | In The Darkroom | 111 | October 10th 04 04:08 AM |
can one print at actual pixels size? | nobody nowhere | Digital Photography | 97 | July 6th 04 10:54 AM |
Print more photos on one paper and save printing papers! | Steve Chambers | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | February 26th 04 07:07 PM |