If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quandary - DX or FX?
I'm in a bit of a quandary. I've currently got a D7000 and an 18-105 lens.
Ive recently (this year) switched back to SLR's after a decade of using digital point and shoot. I'm certainly pleased with D7000, but am finding the 18-105 to be a bit too slow in low light (indoors without flash) and am thinking of buying a faster lens. Also I've found some of the (cropped) images to be not quite as sharp as I would like. This mainly seems to occur in low light shots. I'm also keen to try some macro photography too, and have been thinking about a macro lens, perhaps extension tubes or even a bellows. My quandary is this. I'm not (at all) sure that I'm satisfied with a DX format and really don't want to buy new lenses and accessories and then find myself needing to re-buy them if/when I buy an FX body. So, what do you think. Should I spend more time and practise getting the best out of my D7000 or switch to an FX body now? Cost is not particular issue - that said I don't want to be wasteful. Appreciate any feedback. -- Nige Danton - Replace the obvious with g.m.a.i.l |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon Quandary: D60 or D200? | SteveG | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | January 22nd 09 02:28 PM |
Nikon Quandary: D60 or D200? | nospam | Digital SLR Cameras | 1 | January 21st 09 10:16 AM |
Compression quandary / question | Earl Misanchuk | Digital Photography | 4 | September 15th 06 07:52 PM |
Tele-extender quandary: 1.4x or 2x | Norm Dresner | Digital SLR Cameras | 17 | June 12th 05 06:41 AM |