If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:27:39 -0700, Bill W
wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:50:58 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/19/2015 6:44 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:58:34 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/14/2015 1:45 AM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:46:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-14 01:34:45 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:04:02 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-13 23:15:27 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:39:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Here is a B&W take of my Exposure 7 trial. For this rendition I wanted to see how it matched up against NIK Silver Efex Pro 2, and I am impressed. Here I used an Ilford B&W emulation + Vignette, and added 50% grain as if developed in Rodinal, and a few other tweaks. This really looks like grain, not noise. https://db.tt/NBuFaHS1 What was your final verdict on HDR Express? Did you buy it? Yes. I like the subtlety of the results, and I can afford it. It adds another tool to my tool box. Very different HDR results from those produced by NIK HDR Efex Pro or Photomatix, and even HDR Pro in Photoshop. Wasn't that you who posted the photo of a tree next to a road, inviting everyone to try some HDR on it? Did you try the new software on that one? Yup! Here is a rendition of that tree done with HDR Express 3. https://db.tt/NB1lG9Ng For ~$80, I'll probably get it, too. Okay, I got the lighting where I wanted it pretty quickly, but when I saved the image as a Tiff, it seemed to desaturate it in a major way. Did you notice anything like that? Here are the before and after images: http://imgur.com/5Vn88BN They are both JPG, but I worked with the raw file, and saved the adjusted image as a Tiff. The Tiff is desaturated just like the JPG. There is a saturation slider, and I'm sure I can fix this, but this is not WYSIWYG for some reason, and I would have to do the trial and error thing. Why did you save it as a tiff? As opposed to what? Is tiff, or jpeg, your only options. I was thinking you were talking about a PS plugin, or that there was an option to export to LR or PS. I do most everything in DXO Optics Pro (& Viewpoint) now. LR & PS are just for things I can't do with DXO - cloning, spot removal, etc. I export from DXO to TIFF so I have an uncompressed processed copy from the original raw file. I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ WOW! -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On 4/19/2015 9:27 PM, Bill W wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:50:58 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/19/2015 6:44 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:58:34 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/14/2015 1:45 AM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:46:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-14 01:34:45 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:04:02 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-13 23:15:27 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:39:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Here is a B&W take of my Exposure 7 trial. For this rendition I wanted to see how it matched up against NIK Silver Efex Pro 2, and I am impressed. Here I used an Ilford B&W emulation + Vignette, and added 50% grain as if developed in Rodinal, and a few other tweaks. This really looks like grain, not noise. https://db.tt/NBuFaHS1 What was your final verdict on HDR Express? Did you buy it? Yes. I like the subtlety of the results, and I can afford it. It adds another tool to my tool box. Very different HDR results from those produced by NIK HDR Efex Pro or Photomatix, and even HDR Pro in Photoshop. Wasn't that you who posted the photo of a tree next to a road, inviting everyone to try some HDR on it? Did you try the new software on that one? Yup! Here is a rendition of that tree done with HDR Express 3. https://db.tt/NB1lG9Ng For ~$80, I'll probably get it, too. Okay, I got the lighting where I wanted it pretty quickly, but when I saved the image as a Tiff, it seemed to desaturate it in a major way. Did you notice anything like that? Here are the before and after images: http://imgur.com/5Vn88BN They are both JPG, but I worked with the raw file, and saved the adjusted image as a Tiff. The Tiff is desaturated just like the JPG. There is a saturation slider, and I'm sure I can fix this, but this is not WYSIWYG for some reason, and I would have to do the trial and error thing. Why did you save it as a tiff? As opposed to what? Is tiff, or jpeg, your only options. I was thinking you were talking about a PS plugin, or that there was an option to export to LR or PS. I do most everything in DXO Optics Pro (& Viewpoint) now. LR & PS are just for things I can't do with DXO - cloning, spot removal, etc. I export from DXO to TIFF so I have an uncompressed processed copy from the original raw file. I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ my use of DXO is the opposite of the way you use it. I only use DXO for things I can;t do in PS. But, back to your issue: You can save as a PSD, but that is nothing more than a propriatory form of tiff,. I found no color shifts when I export to PS. -- PeterN |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:56:18 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2015-04-20 06:12:06 +0000, Bill W said: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 22:03:06 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-20 03:23:55 +0000, Bill W said: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:03:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-20 01:27:39 +0000, Bill W said: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:50:58 -0400, PeterN wrote On 4/19/2015 6:44 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:58:34 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/14/2015 1:45 AM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:46:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-14 01:34:45 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:04:02 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-13 23:15:27 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:39:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Here is a B&W take of my Exposure 7 trial. For this rendition I wanted to see how it matched up against NIK Silver Efex Pro 2, and I am impressed. Here I used an Ilford B&W emulation + Vignette, and added 50% grain as if developed in Rodinal, and a few other tweaks. This really looks like grain, not noise. https://db.tt/NBuFaHS1 What was your final verdict on HDR Express? Did you buy it? Yes. I like the subtlety of the results, and I can afford it. It adds another tool to my tool box. Very different HDR results from those produced by NIK HDR Efex Pro or Photomatix, and even HDR Pro in Photoshop. Wasn't that you who posted the photo of a tree next to a road, inviting everyone to try some HDR on it? Did you try the new software on that one? Yup! Here is a rendition of that tree done with HDR Express 3. https://db.tt/NB1lG9Ng For ~$80, I'll probably get it, too. Okay, I got the lighting where I wanted it pretty quickly, but when I saved the image as a Tiff, it seemed to desaturate it in a major way. Did you notice anything like that? Here are the before and after images: http://imgur.com/5Vn88BN They are both JPG, but I worked with the raw file, and saved the adjusted image as a Tiff. The Tiff is desaturated just like the JPG. There is a saturation slider, and I'm sure I can fix this, but this is not WYSIWYG for some reason, and I would have to do the trial and error thing. Why did you save it as a tiff? As opposed to what? Is tiff, or jpeg, your only options. I was thinking you were talking about a PS plugin, or that there was an option to export to LR or PS. I do most everything in DXO Optics Pro (& Viewpoint) now. LR & PS are just for things I can't do with DXO - cloning, spot removal, etc. I export from DXO to TIFF so I have an uncompressed processed copy from the original raw file. I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ I see you had a poseur "Fabulous Hudson Hornet" in that set, here is a real runner, https://db.tt/SAFUrxQ2 https://db.tt/JKrPBH4H What's the background on those? I'm not familiar with them. You just have to go back to 1948-1956. http://www.legendsofnascar.com/hudson.htm http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2014/05/05/original-fabulous-hudson-hornet-nascar-racer-to-be-added-to-national-historic-vehicle-register/ I see... What makes the one I ran across a poseur? I'm not saying it's the real thing, but I'm not following what you're saying. Just verbosity on my part, they were just words leading to my two shots. The Hudson on your collection reminded me that I too had shots of a "Fabulous Hudson Hornet". Oh, okay. I had no idea what it was when I took the photo. There was probably a sign describing it, but I never looked. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:22:33 -0400, PeterN
wrote: On 4/19/2015 9:27 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:50:58 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/19/2015 6:44 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:58:34 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/14/2015 1:45 AM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:46:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-14 01:34:45 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:04:02 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-13 23:15:27 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:39:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Here is a B&W take of my Exposure 7 trial. For this rendition I wanted to see how it matched up against NIK Silver Efex Pro 2, and I am impressed. Here I used an Ilford B&W emulation + Vignette, and added 50% grain as if developed in Rodinal, and a few other tweaks. This really looks like grain, not noise. https://db.tt/NBuFaHS1 What was your final verdict on HDR Express? Did you buy it? Yes. I like the subtlety of the results, and I can afford it. It adds another tool to my tool box. Very different HDR results from those produced by NIK HDR Efex Pro or Photomatix, and even HDR Pro in Photoshop. Wasn't that you who posted the photo of a tree next to a road, inviting everyone to try some HDR on it? Did you try the new software on that one? Yup! Here is a rendition of that tree done with HDR Express 3. https://db.tt/NB1lG9Ng For ~$80, I'll probably get it, too. Okay, I got the lighting where I wanted it pretty quickly, but when I saved the image as a Tiff, it seemed to desaturate it in a major way. Did you notice anything like that? Here are the before and after images: http://imgur.com/5Vn88BN They are both JPG, but I worked with the raw file, and saved the adjusted image as a Tiff. The Tiff is desaturated just like the JPG. There is a saturation slider, and I'm sure I can fix this, but this is not WYSIWYG for some reason, and I would have to do the trial and error thing. Why did you save it as a tiff? As opposed to what? Is tiff, or jpeg, your only options. I was thinking you were talking about a PS plugin, or that there was an option to export to LR or PS. I do most everything in DXO Optics Pro (& Viewpoint) now. LR & PS are just for things I can't do with DXO - cloning, spot removal, etc. I export from DXO to TIFF so I have an uncompressed processed copy from the original raw file. I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ my use of DXO is the opposite of the way you use it. I only use DXO for things I can;t do in PS. But, back to your issue: You can save as a PSD, but that is nothing more than a propriatory form of tiff,. I found no color shifts when I export to PS. I had the color shift issue only when exporting from HDR Express. I'm going to play around with it some more, but I didn't get a chance yet. One reason for starting with DXO is that I always use it for lens distortion correction. But what was happening was the lens info seemed to disappear from the files when I processed with other software first, so the automatic corrections weren't available. And there is no way to force a lens profile onto a photo. This is just one more issue I never got a chance to look into again. I'd really like to know why the lens info disappears, and if I can fix that. Anyway, once I started processing with DXO first, I realized I could do all the other standard adjustments, too, and just as well as in PS or LR, in my opinion. (I actually use PS Elements.) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On 4/20/2015 9:23 AM, Bill W wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:22:33 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/19/2015 9:27 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 19:50:58 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/19/2015 6:44 PM, Bill W wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 15:58:34 -0400, PeterN wrote: On 4/14/2015 1:45 AM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:46:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-14 01:34:45 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:04:02 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2015-04-13 23:15:27 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 11:39:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: Here is a B&W take of my Exposure 7 trial. For this rendition I wanted to see how it matched up against NIK Silver Efex Pro 2, and I am impressed. Here I used an Ilford B&W emulation + Vignette, and added 50% grain as if developed in Rodinal, and a few other tweaks. This really looks like grain, not noise. https://db.tt/NBuFaHS1 What was your final verdict on HDR Express? Did you buy it? Yes. I like the subtlety of the results, and I can afford it. It adds another tool to my tool box. Very different HDR results from those produced by NIK HDR Efex Pro or Photomatix, and even HDR Pro in Photoshop. Wasn't that you who posted the photo of a tree next to a road, inviting everyone to try some HDR on it? Did you try the new software on that one? Yup! Here is a rendition of that tree done with HDR Express 3. https://db.tt/NB1lG9Ng For ~$80, I'll probably get it, too. Okay, I got the lighting where I wanted it pretty quickly, but when I saved the image as a Tiff, it seemed to desaturate it in a major way. Did you notice anything like that? Here are the before and after images: http://imgur.com/5Vn88BN They are both JPG, but I worked with the raw file, and saved the adjusted image as a Tiff. The Tiff is desaturated just like the JPG. There is a saturation slider, and I'm sure I can fix this, but this is not WYSIWYG for some reason, and I would have to do the trial and error thing. Why did you save it as a tiff? As opposed to what? Is tiff, or jpeg, your only options. I was thinking you were talking about a PS plugin, or that there was an option to export to LR or PS. I do most everything in DXO Optics Pro (& Viewpoint) now. LR & PS are just for things I can't do with DXO - cloning, spot removal, etc. I export from DXO to TIFF so I have an uncompressed processed copy from the original raw file. I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ my use of DXO is the opposite of the way you use it. I only use DXO for things I can;t do in PS. But, back to your issue: You can save as a PSD, but that is nothing more than a propriatory form of tiff,. I found no color shifts when I export to PS. I had the color shift issue only when exporting from HDR Express. I'm going to play around with it some more, but I didn't get a chance yet. One reason for starting with DXO is that I always use it for lens distortion correction. But what was happening was the lens info seemed to disappear from the files when I processed with other software first, so the automatic corrections weren't available. And there is no way to force a lens profile onto a photo. This is just one more issue I never got a chance to look into again. I'd really like to know why the lens info disappears, and if I can fix that. Anyway, once I started processing with DXO first, I realized I could do all the other standard adjustments, too, and just as well as in PS or LR, in my opinion. (I actually use PS Elements.) The export to: feature gives you the best of both. -- PeterN |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On 2015-04-20 13:23:32 +0000, Bill W said:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:22:33 -0400, PeterN wrote: my use of DXO is the opposite of the way you use it. I only use DXO for things I can;t do in PS. But, back to your issue: You can save as a PSD, but that is nothing more than a propriatory form of tiff,. I found no color shifts when I export to PS. I had the color shift issue only when exporting from HDR Express. I'm going to play around with it some more, but I didn't get a chance yet. Just to clarify, when using HDR Express are you opening RAW or DNG files directly without any prior adjustment or conversion? ....or are you making lens corrections, and other tweaks first? With HDR from LR5 DNGs/NEFs I only make the lens correction upon competion of the round trip from LR to HDR express. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:36:07 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2015-04-20 13:23:32 +0000, Bill W said: On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:22:33 -0400, PeterN wrote: my use of DXO is the opposite of the way you use it. I only use DXO for things I can;t do in PS. But, back to your issue: You can save as a PSD, but that is nothing more than a propriatory form of tiff,. I found no color shifts when I export to PS. I had the color shift issue only when exporting from HDR Express. I'm going to play around with it some more, but I didn't get a chance yet. Just to clarify, when using HDR Express are you opening RAW or DNG files directly without any prior adjustment or conversion? ...or are you making lens corrections, and other tweaks first? No - straight from the raw file, no other corrections at all. I'll let you know what I find after I get a chance to play around with some other files. I might even try their customer support to see if that's a known issue. With HDR from LR5 DNGs/NEFs I only make the lens correction upon competion of the round trip from LR to HDR express. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:58:45 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:27:39 -0700, Bill W wrote: I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ WOW! Big event, lots of cars, lots of really nice cars. But this is the real reason I go: https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651387470967/ |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On 4/20/2015 2:47 PM, Bill W wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:58:45 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:27:39 -0700, Bill W wrote: I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ WOW! Big event, lots of cars, lots of really nice cars. But this is the real reason I go: https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651387470967/ Now if you are near Coney Island on the Saturday before Father's day, here is a reason to be there. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/_DSC5121_4844.jpg Lotsa cars too. -- PeterN |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
More on Exposure 7
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:12:48 -0400, PeterN
wrote: On 4/20/2015 2:47 PM, Bill W wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:58:45 +1200, Eric Stevens wrote: On Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:27:39 -0700, Bill W wrote: I honestly don't do much post. I don't try to sell, or display anything, except displaying some stuff on Flickr. But even with Flickr, I do little post. I just point friends to the photos of car shows, air shows, whatever. In fact, this link points to the first time I bothered with cropping, leveling, and anything beyond basic exposure before I put them on Flickr (warning: it's just a bunch of cars): https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651795473686/ WOW! Big event, lots of cars, lots of really nice cars. But this is the real reason I go: https://www.flickr.com/photos/489821...7651387470967/ Now if you are near Coney Island on the Saturday before Father's day, here is a reason to be there. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/97242118/_DSC5121_4844.jpg Lotsa cars too. Sheesh - I though Las Vegas was the adult playground... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exposure | Focus[_3_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | January 31st 09 01:46 AM |
Canon SD1000 - 15 sec exposure -- time delay exposure | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 2 | June 12th 07 06:44 PM |
Adam's Exposure Formula contracts with the Addative Photographic Exposure System (APEX) | Steven Woody | In The Darkroom | 6 | January 15th 07 03:32 AM |
Exposure indexes and exposure | Richard Knoppow | In The Darkroom | 4 | October 15th 04 11:48 PM |
Digital Exposure Question -- Middle Gray vs Exposure At Highlights | MikeS | Digital Photography | 1 | June 24th 04 08:04 AM |