If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cost Effective "Pro" Compact
I will be travelling to countries where an expensive camera would
attract too much attention. I would love to take an LX3, G11 or Nikon D40, but would not feel comfortable with it. I would also prefer "pocket-size", or a maybe bit larger, for being as inconspicuous as possible. If I go down in price a few steps, what digital point-and-shoot cameras with a mid-range zoom have the better reputation for quality images. RAW would be great, but I can do without. Thank you for any advice. Bill Murphy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cost Effective "Pro" Compact
Bill Murphy wrote:
I will be travelling to countries where an expensive camera would attract too much attention. I would love to take an LX3, G11 or Nikon D40, but would not feel comfortable with it. Get a G11 and get it dirty & scratched, black tape over the labels & flash, flip the LCD over so it's hidden & use the optical viewfinder so people think it's a P&S film camera. Carry it in a dumpy looking cloth lunch bag. I would also prefer "pocket-size", or a maybe bit larger, for being as inconspicuous as possible. If I go down in price a few steps, what digital point-and-shoot cameras with a mid-range zoom have the better reputation for quality images. RAW would be great, but I can do without. Thank you for any advice. Bill Murphy -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cost Effective "Pro" Compact
I will be travelling to countries where an expensive camera would
attract too much attention. I would love to take an LX3, G11 or Nikon D40, but would not feel comfortable with it. I would also prefer "pocket-size", or a maybe bit larger, for being as inconspicuous as possible. If I go down in price a few steps, what digital point-and-shoot cameras with a mid-range zoom have the better reputation for quality images. canon g11 or S90 has above average sensor size, but still small compared to DSLR if you need even better low light camera, then consider a micro 4/3 camera -- but this more than doubles the cost. In fact they cost more than some DSLRs. You can get a feel of low light capabilities by going to dpreview.com and checking out the sample photos of each camera. Sample photos are taken in different ISO settings. (resent due to possible problem with nntp server) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cost Effective "Pro" Compact
In article , james wrote: I will be travelling to countries where an expensive camera would attract too much attention. I would love to take an LX3, G11 or Nikon D40, but would not feel comfortable with it. I would also prefer "pocket-size", or a maybe bit larger, for being as inconspicuous as possible. If I go down in price a few steps, what digital point-and-shoot cameras with a mid-range zoom have the better reputation for quality images. canon g11 or S90 has above average sensor size, but still small compared to DSLR if you need even better low light camera, then consider a micro 4/3 camera -- but this more than doubles the cost. In fact they cost more than some DSLRs. You can get a feel of low light capabilities by going to dpreview.com and checking out the sample photos of each camera. Sample photos are taken in different ISO settings. (resent due to possible problem with nntp server) I'm shopping in the same general area here, and was looking for a while at the smallest of the Micro four-thirds cameras that look more like compact P&S than smaller DSLR's (i.e. the Lumix GF-1 and Olympus EPL-P1). Unfortunately they both have fatal flaws. Neither has a viewfinder as standard equipment (optional accessories that add considerably to the price and impact on battery life) and the LCD's have been described as "useless" in bright sunlight. Both have weak flash. The Olympus has no AF-assist lamp, and the Lumix has weird washed-out JPEG color rendition. I _really_ wanted to like this little niche but I think the design factor has a way to go. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Cost "Back-Door" To A Profitable Part Time Photography Career | [email protected] | General Photography Techniques | 0 | January 24th 07 03:11 PM |
Low Cost "Back-Door" To A Profitable Part Time Photography Career | [email protected] | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 24th 07 03:04 PM |
Low Cost "Back-Door" To A Profitable Part Time Photography Career | [email protected] | Darkroom Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 24th 07 02:58 PM |
Low Cost "Back-Door" To A Profitable Part Time Photography Career | [email protected] | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | January 24th 07 02:56 PM |
Low Cost "Back-Door" To A Profitable Part Time Photography Career | eunice white | APS Photographic Equipment | 0 | January 24th 07 02:47 PM |