If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
Although three years old already, the film "Kodachrome" has appeared on
Netflix's list (Europe) . I an guessing it will be entertaining watching for most posters here. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1880399/ Who has seen/witnessed the photographers' salute - the equivalent of a 21 gun military salute - which is towards the end of the film? It's the first time I've seen it, and am keen to establish whether it is a bit of Hollywood fantasy, rather than a real "thing". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
On 02/09/2020 13:17, occam wrote:
Although three years old already, the film "Kodachrome" has appeared on Netflix's list (Europe) . I an guessing it will be entertaining watching for most posters here. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1880399/ Who has seen/witnessed the photographers' salute - the equivalent of a 21 gun military salute - which is towards the end of the film? It's the first time I've seen it, and am keen to establish whether it is a bit of Hollywood fantasy, rather than a real "thing". KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
In article ,
newshound wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
On 13/02/2021 10:23 am, nospam wrote:
In article , newshound wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. geoff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
In article , geoff
wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
On 14/02/2021 12:45 am, nospam wrote:
In article , geoff wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. 'Digital' didn't exist in the 1980s as a consumer photographic item. geoff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
In article , geoff
wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. 'Digital' didn't exist in the 1980s as a consumer photographic item. this may come to you as a surprise, but it's not the 1980s anymore. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
In article ,
Magani wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. 'Digital' didn't exist in the 1980s as a consumer photographic item. this may come to you as a surprise, but it's not the 1980s anymore. Simon and Garfunkel did a great version... :-)) yep, that's the only version of kodachrome that's any good. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
On Feb 13, 2021, Magani wrote
(in ): On Sunday, 14 February 2021 at 9:00:28 am UTC+10, nospam wrote: In , geoff wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. 'Digital' didn't exist in the 1980s as a consumer photographic item. this may come to you as a surprise, but it's not the 1980s anymore. Simon and Garfunkel did a great version... :-)) Actually that was Paul Simon solo, no Art Garfunkel. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kodachrome (2017)
In article .com,
Savageduck wrote: KII, still the best film ever IMHO. K25 was never as good. slow as hell, so not the best film. My standard was K64 , Benefit over K25 was that you could generally use it HH. like i said, it's still slow as hell, plus it had oversaturated unrealistic colours that for some reason, people liked. digital is *significantly* faster, with higher resolution, wider dynamic range, far, far more accurate colours and with a wider gamut. those who want the 'kodachrome' look (or that of any other film) can easily dial it in, although there's no reason to do so other than to intentionally reduce the quality of the results. 'Digital' didn't exist in the 1980s as a consumer photographic item. this may come to you as a surprise, but it's not the 1980s anymore. Simon and Garfunkel did a great version... :-)) Actually that was Paul Simon solo, no Art Garfunkel. that's because art garfunkel preferred vericolor. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILC Sales Up in 2017! | android | Digital Photography | 0 | January 8th 18 07:27 AM |
Northern Lights - Oct 2017 guided tour FYI | -hh | Digital Photography | 1 | July 7th 17 04:22 PM |
[TechRadar] The 10 best digital cameras in 2017 | Internetado | Digital Photography | 1 | March 14th 17 06:17 PM |
On1 Photo RAW 2017.0.2 released | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | February 15th 17 05:18 AM |
Photo Editing 2017 - An Opinion | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 61 | January 25th 17 10:28 AM |