If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
LR Kalajainen says...
You can substitute either borax or carbonate for the metaborate. Borax will give longer development times since it is a weaker activating agent. Carbonate will give shorter developing times because it is a more active agent. Ok i know this. And it's a good think to remind to me!! But if you don't mind experimenting with the times to find the right time for normal development, neither substitute is likely to make much difference in the final image. Both will work. The only thing is to test by myself, with borax and/or sodium carbonate. Yeah. HAve you some starting point to work with? Ciao, Stefano Bramato -- ed io imparo... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article , John wrote:
Yes but only because it keeps better on the shelf. Also the prepared blend by a lab will probably be better than what you can make in your darkroom. When it comes to bathroom processing of films, I'm all for the KISS approach. That's why I prefer D23 it's simple and simply works. JD - www.puresilver.org Metaborate is very easy to mix, I never have any problems. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:16:40 GMT, Gregory Blank wrote:
Metaborate is very easy to mix, I never have any problems. Yeah but then you're not exactly Joe Average in the darkroom either. JD - www.puresilver.org |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote in message ... On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:03:47 +0100, "Keith Tapscott" wrote: I have a book published by Kodak titled: KODAK HANDBOOK FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER (VOLUME 4), inside the book is a formulary of Kodak B&W chemicals, the formula for the 10 grams of Sodium Metaborate needed for the DK-50 formula using Borax-Decahydrate and Sodium Hydroxide is as follows: Sodium Hydroxide (Caustic soda), dissolve separately in 100 ml of cold water, 1.5 grams of the caustic soda adding it very slowly, stirring constantly. NEVER add the water to the caustic soda. The amount of Borax-Decahydrate that is needed is 7 grams, this book dates back to the 1970s when Sodium Metaborate was not so readily available as it is today in the UK. Don't you think that it would be better to buy the Sodium Metaborate in the first place ? Yes but only because it keeps better on the shelf. Also the prepared blend by a lab will probably be better than what you can make in your darkroom. When it comes to bathroom processing of films, I'm all for the KISS approach. That's why I prefer D23 it's simple and simply works. JD - www.puresilver.org John, D-23 is fine by me if that is what you like using, some people who make their own D-23 or D-25 may wish to use the DK-25R replenisher which requires 20 grams of Sodium Metaborate, now you could use 2.9 grams of Sodium Hydroxide and 14 grams of Borax-Decahydrate, but you mention that you like to keep things simple, isn't buying and using Sodium Metaborate in the first place the KISS approach ? It is hardly an expensive component to buy and far less hassle than dissolving two separate components. I sometimes use one of the sons of D-23 called Ilford Perceptol, luvverly stuff ! Cheers, Keith. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know what film you're using, but I use both Delta 400 and Fuji
ACROS 100. I use a Phenidone/Ascorbic Acid/Carbonate developer. With Delta 400, a good starting time would be 5:30 at 20C. With ACROS, 7:30 at 20C. Stefano Bramato wrote: LR Kalajainen says... You can substitute either borax or carbonate for the metaborate. Borax will give longer development times since it is a weaker activating agent. Carbonate will give shorter developing times because it is a more active agent. Ok i know this. And it's a good think to remind to me!! But if you don't mind experimenting with the times to find the right time for normal development, neither substitute is likely to make much difference in the final image. Both will work. The only thing is to test by myself, with borax and/or sodium carbonate. Yeah. HAve you some starting point to work with? Ciao, Stefano Bramato -- ed io imparo... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
LR Kalajainen says ...
I don't know what film you're using, but I use both Delta 400 and Fuji ACROS 100. I use a Phenidone/Ascorbic Acid/Carbonate developer. With Delta 400, a good starting time would be 5:30 at 20C. With ACROS, 7:30 at 20C. Most of time I use Neopan 400 and Acros 100 for 120 format rolls. But in this time i'm experimenting with delta 400 so it's ok. Can you send to me the exact recipe for your soup? I'm everytime a newbie and don't want to go wrong!! Ciao, Stefano Bramato -- ed io imparo... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
You're in luck. I've also used Fuji Neopan 400 and have times for it as
well. 2 g. Ascorbic Acid 5 g Sodium Metaborate (For Fuji, substitute 6 g Sodium Carbonate) 4ml 1% Phenidone solution (1 g Phenidone dissolved in 100 ml 90% alcohol) Delta 400--6:30 at 22C. Fuji:--7:00 at 22C. (with carbonate instead of metaborate. With metaborate, 10 minutes at 22C.) Hope this works for you as well as it's worked for me. Larry Stefano Bramato wrote: LR Kalajainen says ... I don't know what film you're using, but I use both Delta 400 and Fuji ACROS 100. I use a Phenidone/Ascorbic Acid/Carbonate developer. With Delta 400, a good starting time would be 5:30 at 20C. With ACROS, 7:30 at 20C. Most of time I use Neopan 400 and Acros 100 for 120 format rolls. But in this time i'm experimenting with delta 400 so it's ok. Can you send to me the exact recipe for your soup? I'm everytime a newbie and don't want to go wrong!! Ciao, Stefano Bramato -- ed io imparo... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:28:09 -0400, LR Kalajainen wrote:
You can substitute either borax or carbonate for the metaborate. Borax will give longer development times since it is a weaker activating agent. Carbonate will give shorter developing times because it is a more active agent. But if you don't mind experimenting with the times to find the right time for normal development, neither substitute is likely to make much difference in the final image. Both will work. I have found quite a significant difference. When images are developed to the same contrast index, those developed in carbonate are significantly grainier than those developed in Borax . JD - www.puresilver.org |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I think this depends on the film.
I mostly use the T-grain films (Delta, ACROS, (new) Neopan and it's pretty hard for me to tell much difference in grain size in enlargments up to 11X14. I suspect with older films, TX, FP4, etc, you're correct. John wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:28:09 -0400, LR Kalajainen wrote: You can substitute either borax or carbonate for the metaborate. Borax will give longer development times since it is a weaker activating agent. Carbonate will give shorter developing times because it is a more active agent. But if you don't mind experimenting with the times to find the right time for normal development, neither substitute is likely to make much difference in the final image. Both will work. I have found quite a significant difference. When images are developed to the same contrast index, those developed in carbonate are significantly grainier than those developed in Borax . JD - www.puresilver.org |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote
[films] developed in carbonate are significantly grainier than those developed in Borax . The only use I have found for extra carbonate is in paper developer where it deepens the shadows a smidge. Adding carbonate for the shadows and a (small) amount of p. bromide to keep highlights clear was recommended by - ? - Minor White (so I imagine the addition leads to a more spiritual experience). Lootens claims carbonate can be used to salvage almost exhausted paper developer -- useful to know if paper developer can't be found around the corner and you find yourself short. I have never tried it. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A substitute for Ilford Bromophen. | Keith Tapscott | In The Darkroom | 13 | April 26th 05 07:14 PM |
Windows "magnify" program substitute | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 4 | January 23rd 05 06:08 PM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
Substitute for Tech Pan? | Uranium Committee | In The Darkroom | 50 | October 21st 04 02:01 AM |