If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Preferable to sharpen in camera or in Photoshop?
I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be
preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Burt" wrote in message ... I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? My understanding is that you would probably get better sharpening in your editing software, rather than letting the camera do some sharpening (and you doing subsequent sharpening in yourpost-shoot editing). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Burt" wrote in message ... I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? My understanding is that you would probably get better sharpening in your editing software, rather than letting the camera do some sharpening (and you doing subsequent sharpening in yourpost-shoot editing). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Burt wrote in news:u640t05erg332n18jn0h5jmhubf4s3vndp@
4ax.com: I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? According to my humble opinion, you shall always do sharpening as the last modification of the picture. Sharpening is a destructive operation and it is best to have at least one original without sharpening. Now - it all depends of course. If it is just pictures from a party and you never plan to do any modification. Then, it is OK to apply in camera sharpening and even using a lower resolution. /Roland |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Burt" wrote in message ... I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? Have you noticed any difference either way? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Karlsson wrote:
Burt wrote in news:u640t05erg332n18jn0h5jmhubf4s3vndp@ 4ax.com: I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? According to my humble opinion, you shall always do sharpening as the last modification of the picture. Sharpening is a destructive operation and it is best to have at least one original without sharpening. Now - it all depends of course. If it is just pictures from a party and you never plan to do any modification. Then, it is OK to apply in camera sharpening and even using a lower resolution. /Roland For what are you saving the unsharpened original? If it needs sharpening, sharpen it. If it's done right, it's done right. I suppose that if you don't do it right, saving an original unsharpened would be good until you can get a tool to do it right. Clyde |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Roland Karlsson wrote:
Burt wrote in news:u640t05erg332n18jn0h5jmhubf4s3vndp@ 4ax.com: I am using an olympus c4000z, photoshop, and Ultrasharpen. Would it be preferable to turn sharpening off in the camera and do the work with Ultrasharpen in Photoshop, or to do the sharpening in the camera instead? According to my humble opinion, you shall always do sharpening as the last modification of the picture. Sharpening is a destructive operation and it is best to have at least one original without sharpening. Now - it all depends of course. If it is just pictures from a party and you never plan to do any modification. Then, it is OK to apply in camera sharpening and even using a lower resolution. /Roland For what are you saving the unsharpened original? If it needs sharpening, sharpen it. If it's done right, it's done right. I suppose that if you don't do it right, saving an original unsharpened would be good until you can get a tool to do it right. Clyde |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
For what are you saving the unsharpened original? If it needs
sharpening, sharpen it. If it's done right, it's done right. I suppose that if you don't do it right, saving an original unsharpened would be good until you can get a tool to do it right. Don't you expect to be better at this next year than you are this year? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Gene, what would be a good reason for anyone to keep the original, not
altered photo, if you are satisfied with the sharpening? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gene, what would be a good reason for anyone to keep the original, not
altered photo, if you are satisfied with the sharpening? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions | Lou | Digital Photography | 5 | November 12th 04 12:43 AM |
coolpix 5700 and speed of writing to cf card | JS | Digital Photography | 12 | September 15th 04 11:17 PM |
Another nail in the view camera coffin? | Robert Feinman | Large Format Photography Equipment | 108 | August 4th 04 03:37 PM |
Batteries for Kodak DX3600 Camera Dock | Larry R Harrison Jr | Digital Photography | 10 | July 24th 04 05:49 PM |