DVD vs JPEG for TV

I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon

I use Adobe Premiere Pro


mikel

Gordon MacPherson wrote:
I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon

I use Adobe Premiere Pro


mikel

Gordon MacPherson wrote:
I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:27:00 +0000, Gordon MacPherson
wrote:

I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon



Without knowing a whole lot mre than you give here, it's going to be
really hard to answer that.

Maybe the reason your DVD player shows better JPEG images is because
it uses progressive scan, and has little to do with the software used?

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:27:00 +0000, Gordon MacPherson
wrote:

I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon



Without knowing a whole lot mre than you give here, it's going to be
really hard to answer that.

Maybe the reason your DVD player shows better JPEG images is because
it uses progressive scan, and has little to do with the software used?

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Gordon MacPherson wrote:

I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

news:rec.video.production and news:rec.video.professional might be the better
place to ask.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.

Gordon MacPherson wrote:

I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

news:rec.video.production and news:rec.video.professional might be the better
place to ask.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.

I would use jpegs, and let the DVD player image them. VCD's are 320x200
or a little worse than VHS.

I would EXPECT that jpegs rather than a vcd would give better images.


Gordon MacPherson wrote:
I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon

I would use jpegs, and let the DVD player image them. VCD's are 320x200
or a little worse than VHS.

I would EXPECT that jpegs rather than a vcd would give better images.


Gordon MacPherson wrote:
I have tried Jasc (Photo Album) and Ulead DVD picture show for making
video CDs to show pics on TV. However using my (cheap) DVD player,
ordinary JPEGs seem to give clearer, more stable images on the TV. Is
this a real thing or a problem with the software. Would Arcsoft give
better TV images?

Thanks,

Gordon

Take a look at photo2dvd program, it's a good application .Have a try
at http://www.photo-to-dvd.com