If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
I recently had some prints made at a local shop that has a printing station
where you load and select your images into the system and they print them. They have produced good stuff before for me. On this occasion I had a handful of 8x12s and a panorama printed. In each case I had done some processing to adjust brightness etc to my taste. The 8X12s all came out very well and matched (to my eyes) what I had edited on the screen very well. The panorama came out very dark in comparison with the screen and not what I was intending at all. I cannot think of any reason why this discrepancy should happen, it is the same printer using the same ink, just different shaped paper. As far as I can tell the paper is the same as the 8x12 paper. As far as I can tell the operator does not intervene in any way other than to send your job to the printer. Can anybody shed any light on why this happened? David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
On 09/07/2013 01:08, David Hare-Scott wrote:
I recently had some prints made at a local shop that has a printing station where you load and select your images into the system and they print them. They have produced good stuff before for me. On this occasion I had a handful of 8x12s and a panorama printed. In each case I had done some processing to adjust brightness etc to my taste. The 8X12s all came out very well and matched (to my eyes) what I had edited on the screen very well. The panorama came out very dark in comparison with the screen and not what I was intending at all. I cannot think of any reason why this discrepancy should happen, it is the same printer using the same ink, just different shaped paper. As far as I can tell the paper is the same as the 8x12 paper. As far as I can tell the operator does not intervene in any way other than to send your job to the printer. Can anybody shed any light on why this happened? Only the shop where the kit is installed stands any real chance of explaining it. Did you ask them about it when you picked up the prints? I am assuming here that the images and prints are as you describe. User error is still the most likely cause of problems like this, but the machines can sometime play up along lesser trod pathways... I discovered once that the Fuji crystal printers with particular early firmware printed monochrome JPEGs (no chroma information at all) using a false colour psychedelic default colour palette. The shop was very good about reprinting the job after I showed them the prints and the original monochrome source material which displayed OK on the screens but went completely haywire when printed through their full system. We actually redid one under controlled conditions to prove that it was the machine at fault. Fuji fixed the firmware in the next release. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
David Hare-Scott wrote:
The 8X12s all came out very well and matched (to my eyes) what I had edited on the screen very well. The panorama came out very dark in comparison with the screen and not what I was intending at all. I cannot think of any reason why this discrepancy should happen, it is the same printer using the same ink, just different shaped paper. But it's a different file, with different data. You don't even tell us the file format and what profile is embedded. Never mind a possible automatic 'corrections' done by the printing software. -Wolfgang |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:08:17 +1000, "David Hare-Scott"
wrote: I recently had some prints made at a local shop that has a printing station where you load and select your images into the system and they print them. They have produced good stuff before for me. On this occasion I had a handful of 8x12s and a panorama printed. In each case I had done some processing to adjust brightness etc to my taste. The 8X12s all came out very well and matched (to my eyes) what I had edited on the screen very well. The panorama came out very dark in comparison with the screen and not what I was intending at all. I cannot think of any reason why this discrepancy should happen, it is the same printer using the same ink, just different shaped paper. As far as I can tell the paper is the same as the 8x12 paper. As far as I can tell the operator does not intervene in any way other than to send your job to the printer. Can anybody shed any light on why this happened? Other info needed? Are you using a color managed workflow and did you soft proof the adjusted images using the profile of the printer used by your shop? If not, how have you calibrated what you see on your monitor to what you get from the printer? What software are you using and did you assign a profile to the pano? What color space do you work in? If there is no profile in the pano what does the printer assume? etc, etc, etc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
me wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 10:08:17 +1000, "David Hare-Scott" wrote: I recently had some prints made at a local shop that has a printing station where you load and select your images into the system and they print them. They have produced good stuff before for me. On this occasion I had a handful of 8x12s and a panorama printed. In each case I had done some processing to adjust brightness etc to my taste. The 8X12s all came out very well and matched (to my eyes) what I had edited on the screen very well. The panorama came out very dark in comparison with the screen and not what I was intending at all. I cannot think of any reason why this discrepancy should happen, it is the same printer using the same ink, just different shaped paper. As far as I can tell the paper is the same as the 8x12 paper. As far as I can tell the operator does not intervene in any way other than to send your job to the printer. Can anybody shed any light on why this happened? Other info needed? Are you using a color managed workflow and did you soft proof the adjusted images using the profile of the printer used by your shop? no, no If not, how have you calibrated what you see on your monitor to what you get from the printer? no What software are you using and did you assign a profile to the pano? Various software, all the images looked fine on screen regardless of the editor/viewer I used, no What color space do you work in? If there is no profile in the pano what does the printer assume? no idea etc, etc, etc. probably no to them also. I have a vague idea what all this means. I take it to be the processes by which professionals control the outcome of printing. I am not one. I bet the bloke at the shop wouldn't have the slightest idea either, they mainly sell whitegoods, TVs and computer accessories. If I asked him what pano does his printer assume he would smile and ask me who is pano. The nearest place where they might have a clue is probably 120km away. These people are local, not too expensive and at least willing to try and help, I am stuck with them. If you are saying this is the only way to be certain of the result then I will have to accept a degree of randomness. I was hoping that somebody would say 'when the operator changed the paper he forgot to fondle the framistan or he bumped the frobdignag with his elbow'. Apparently not. Sigh. David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
On 2013-07-10 16:42:07 -0700, "David Hare-Scott" said:
I have a vague idea what all this means. I take it to be the processes by which professionals control the outcome of printing. I am not one. I bet the bloke at the shop wouldn't have the slightest idea either, they mainly sell whitegoods, TVs and computer accessories. If I asked him what pano does his printer assume he would smile and ask me who is pano. The nearest place where they might have a clue is probably 120km away. These people are local, not too expensive and at least willing to try and help, I am stuck with them. If you are saying this is the only way to be certain of the result then I will have to accept a degree of randomness. I was hoping that somebody would say 'when the operator changed the paper he forgot to fondle the framistan or he bumped the frobdignag with his elbow'. Apparently not. Sigh. David Some establishments offering print services can provide two different levels of service when it comes to color correction, and that is dependent on their level of expertise. Some labs have trained staff to deal with color correction, including adjustments for Lightness/darkness, RGB, saturation, and contrast. They will view and color correct each image individually, and charge accordingly. These same labs will also take image files where the customer prefers to make their own color corrections (they will usually provide evaluation prints at no charge). However, to get prints which meet your satisfaction they usually ask that you have a properly calibrated and profiled monitor so you can get consistent and repeatable results. At a minimum, you will also be required to ensure that you have embedded an ICC profile in the file you send them to print from. This will usually be either sRGB or Adobe RGB(1998) and will reflect the colorspace you are working in with your photo eding software. Usually when saving edited jpeg image files in applications such as CS6 or Photoshop Elements there will be a check box in the "save as" dialog box "Embed Color Profile", make sure this box is checked. Many of the type of establishment you are probably using have no idea of this requirement. I suspect the issues you had with your panorama (the mysterious "pano" mentioned above) had to do with the panorama image you saved not having an embedded ICC profile, probably sRGB, while not as wide a color gamut as Adobe RGB(1998), this seems to be what kiosk type labs will need. Your non-pano images probably had an embedded profile. If you haven't got a tool for calibrating your monitor, follow the instructions provided with your monitor or computer. Make sure you make this manual calibration in the same room light conditions you normally work in. (you will get different calibration in a day lit room to one with artificial lighting). Then I suggest that you take that panorama (pano) image file back into your editing application, adjust the the image to your taste, after making sure your software is set to work in one of the two colorspaces I mentioned. Then save the file making sure the profile is embedded. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-07-10 16:42:07 -0700, "David Hare-Scott" said: I have a vague idea what all this means. I take it to be the processes by which professionals control the outcome of printing. I am not one. I bet the bloke at the shop wouldn't have the slightest idea either, they mainly sell whitegoods, TVs and computer accessories. If I asked him what pano does his printer assume he would smile and ask me who is pano. The nearest place where they might have a clue is probably 120km away. These people are local, not too expensive and at least willing to try and help, I am stuck with them. If you are saying this is the only way to be certain of the result then I will have to accept a degree of randomness. I was hoping that somebody would say 'when the operator changed the paper he forgot to fondle the framistan or he bumped the frobdignag with his elbow'. Apparently not. Sigh. David Some establishments offering print services can provide two different levels of service when it comes to color correction, and that is dependent on their level of expertise. Some labs have trained staff to deal with color correction, including adjustments for Lightness/darkness, RGB, saturation, and contrast. They will view and color correct each image individually, and charge accordingly. These same labs will also take image files where the customer prefers to make their own color corrections (they will usually provide evaluation prints at no charge). However, to get prints which meet your satisfaction they usually ask that you have a properly calibrated and profiled monitor so you can get consistent and repeatable results. At a minimum, you will also be required to ensure that you have embedded an ICC profile in the file you send them to print from. This will usually be either sRGB or Adobe RGB(1998) and will reflect the colorspace you are working in with your photo eding software. Usually when saving edited jpeg image files in applications such as CS6 or Photoshop Elements there will be a check box in the "save as" dialog box "Embed Color Profile", make sure this box is checked. Many of the type of establishment you are probably using have no idea of this requirement. I suspect the issues you had with your panorama (the mysterious "pano" mentioned above) had to do with the panorama image you saved not having an embedded ICC profile, probably sRGB, while not as wide a color gamut as Adobe RGB(1998), this seems to be what kiosk type labs will need. Your non-pano images probably had an embedded profile. If you haven't got a tool for calibrating your monitor, follow the instructions provided with your monitor or computer. Make sure you make this manual calibration in the same room light conditions you normally work in. (you will get different calibration in a day lit room to one with artificial lighting). Then I suggest that you take that panorama (pano) image file back into your editing application, adjust the the image to your taste, after making sure your software is set to work in one of the two colorspaces I mentioned. Then save the file making sure the profile is embedded. Thanks to Duck and to Me, well that would be You not me but... oh nevermind, thanks both. I don't think I will be going down the calibrate and match the details route. My requirements don't warrant it and as mentioned the local bureau probably won't cope either. There are only so many things you can study and only so many gadgets you can buy in one lifetime and priorities have to be set. The great majority of their product suits my eye so I will just adjust and re-print any that miss the target by too much. If the re-prints wander off in some other random direction of mismatch and it becomes clear it isn't just my eyes/monitor/lighting/processing at fault I will ask for some freebee replacements, which I expect they will satisfy if it is evident I am a regular customer not just having a loan of them. When you live in a remote location you need to make relationships with the locals. David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
On 2013-07-10 19:04:55 -0700, "David Hare-Scott" said:
Savageduck wrote: On 2013-07-10 16:42:07 -0700, "David Hare-Scott" said: I have a vague idea what all this means. I take it to be the processes by which professionals control the outcome of printing. I am not one. I bet the bloke at the shop wouldn't have the slightest idea either, they mainly sell whitegoods, TVs and computer accessories. If I asked him what pano does his printer assume he would smile and ask me who is pano. The nearest place where they might have a clue is probably 120km away. These people are local, not too expensive and at least willing to try and help, I am stuck with them. If you are saying this is the only way to be certain of the result then I will have to accept a degree of randomness. I was hoping that somebody would say 'when the operator changed the paper he forgot to fondle the framistan or he bumped the frobdignag with his elbow'. Apparently not. Sigh. David Some establishments offering print services can provide two different levels of service when it comes to color correction, and that is dependent on their level of expertise. Some labs have trained staff to deal with color correction, including adjustments for Lightness/darkness, RGB, saturation, and contrast. They will view and color correct each image individually, and charge accordingly. These same labs will also take image files where the customer prefers to make their own color corrections (they will usually provide evaluation prints at no charge). However, to get prints which meet your satisfaction they usually ask that you have a properly calibrated and profiled monitor so you can get consistent and repeatable results. At a minimum, you will also be required to ensure that you have embedded an ICC profile in the file you send them to print from. This will usually be either sRGB or Adobe RGB(1998) and will reflect the colorspace you are working in with your photo eding software. Usually when saving edited jpeg image files in applications such as CS6 or Photoshop Elements there will be a check box in the "save as" dialog box "Embed Color Profile", make sure this box is checked. Many of the type of establishment you are probably using have no idea of this requirement. I suspect the issues you had with your panorama (the mysterious "pano" mentioned above) had to do with the panorama image you saved not having an embedded ICC profile, probably sRGB, while not as wide a color gamut as Adobe RGB(1998), this seems to be what kiosk type labs will need. Your non-pano images probably had an embedded profile. If you haven't got a tool for calibrating your monitor, follow the instructions provided with your monitor or computer. Make sure you make this manual calibration in the same room light conditions you normally work in. (you will get different calibration in a day lit room to one with artificial lighting). Then I suggest that you take that panorama (pano) image file back into your editing application, adjust the the image to your taste, after making sure your software is set to work in one of the two colorspaces I mentioned. Then save the file making sure the profile is embedded. Thanks to Duck and to Me, well that would be You not me but... oh nevermind, thanks both. I don't think I will be going down the calibrate and match the details route. My requirements don't warrant it and as mentioned the local bureau probably won't cope either. There are only so many things you can study and only so many gadgets you can buy in one lifetime and priorities have to be set. The great majority of their product suits my eye so I will just adjust and re-print any that miss the target by too much. If the re-prints wander off in some other random direction of mismatch and it becomes clear it isn't just my eyes/monitor/lighting/processing at fault I will ask for some freebee replacements, which I expect they will satisfy if it is evident I am a regular customer not just having a loan of them. When you live in a remote location you need to make relationships with the locals. David You should at minimum ask them what colorspace profile they use. They might know what you are talking about, they might not, but whatever they are using to print with is going to need that embedded ICC profile to have a chance to produce results consistent to the adjustments you have made. If they plead ignorance, just use sRGB and go for it. Good luck. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
Savageduck wrote:
Thanks to Duck and to Me, well that would be You not me but... oh nevermind, thanks both. I don't think I will be going down the calibrate and match the details route. My requirements don't warrant it and as mentioned the local bureau probably won't cope either. There are only so many things you can study and only so many gadgets you can buy in one lifetime and priorities have to be set. The great majority of their product suits my eye so I will just adjust and re-print any that miss the target by too much. If the re-prints wander off in some other random direction of mismatch and it becomes clear it isn't just my eyes/monitor/lighting/processing at fault I will ask for some freebee replacements, which I expect they will satisfy if it is evident I am a regular customer not just having a loan of them. When you live in a remote location you need to make relationships with the locals. David You should at minimum ask them what colorspace profile they use. They might know what you are talking about, they might not, but whatever they are using to print with is going to need that embedded ICC profile to have a chance to produce results consistent to the adjustments you have made. If they plead ignorance, just use sRGB and go for it. Good luck. I had a chat with the operator. He doesn't know colour space from outer space but he will look into it. We printed another version of the problem image which I had lightened several shades compared to the first. It turned out the same as the first which was too dark, something had reversed my compensation. He agreed it was too dark and asked me if I did any editing to the images and I explained they had all been processed to some extent. Then the light dawned. The print station software has an option for automatically adjusting prints. As they mainly do postcard size from P&S or phones that have had no processing they leave this option on by default. He turned it off and re-printed the pic: problem solved. Apparently the size of the print was not relevant, as one might expect, but it was overall lighter than the others that had been OK. The automagic software had decided everything had to be standard brightness and darkened it leaving the others alone. David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Printing issue
On 11/07/2013 03:04, David Hare-Scott wrote:
Savageduck wrote: On 2013-07-10 16:42:07 -0700, "David Hare-Scott" said: I have a vague idea what all this means. I take it to be the processes by which professionals control the outcome of printing. I am not one. I bet the bloke at the shop wouldn't have the slightest idea either, they mainly sell whitegoods, TVs and computer accessories. If I asked him what pano does his printer assume he would smile and ask me who is pano. The nearest place where they might have a clue is probably 120km away. These people are local, not too expensive and at least willing to try and help, I am stuck with them. If you are saying this is the only way to be certain of the result then I will have to accept a degree of randomness. I was hoping that somebody would say 'when the operator changed the paper he forgot to fondle the framistan or he bumped the frobdignag with his elbow'. Apparently not. Sigh. David Some establishments offering print services can provide two different levels of service when it comes to color correction, and that is dependent on their level of expertise. Some labs have trained staff to deal with color correction, including adjustments for Lightness/darkness, RGB, saturation, and contrast. They will view and color correct each image individually, and charge accordingly. These same labs will also take image files where the customer prefers to make their own color corrections (they will usually provide evaluation prints at no charge). However, to get prints which meet your satisfaction they usually ask that you have a properly calibrated and profiled monitor so you can get consistent and repeatable results. At a minimum, you will also be required to ensure that you have embedded an ICC profile in the file you send them to print from. This will usually be either sRGB or Adobe RGB(1998) and will reflect the colorspace you are working in with your photo eding software. Usually when saving edited jpeg image files in applications such as CS6 or Photoshop Elements there will be a check box in the "save as" dialog box "Embed Color Profile", make sure this box is checked. Many of the type of establishment you are probably using have no idea of this requirement. I suspect the issues you had with your panorama (the mysterious "pano" mentioned above) had to do with the panorama image you saved not having an embedded ICC profile, probably sRGB, while not as wide a color gamut as Adobe RGB(1998), this seems to be what kiosk type labs will need. Your non-pano images probably had an embedded profile. If you haven't got a tool for calibrating your monitor, follow the instructions provided with your monitor or computer. Make sure you make this manual calibration in the same room light conditions you normally work in. (you will get different calibration in a day lit room to one with artificial lighting). Then I suggest that you take that panorama (pano) image file back into your editing application, adjust the the image to your taste, after making sure your software is set to work in one of the two colorspaces I mentioned. Then save the file making sure the profile is embedded. Thanks to Duck and to Me, well that would be You not me but... oh nevermind, thanks both. I don't think I will be going down the calibrate and match the details route. My requirements don't warrant it and as mentioned the local bureau probably won't cope either. There are only so many things you can study and only so many gadgets you can buy in one lifetime and priorities have to be set. The great majority of their product suits my eye so I will just adjust and re-print any that miss the target by too much. If the re-prints wander off in some other random direction of mismatch and it becomes clear it isn't just my eyes/monitor/lighting/processing at fault I will ask for some freebee replacements, which I expect they will satisfy if it is evident I am a regular customer not just having a loan of them. When you live in a remote location you need to make relationships with the locals. Basically what you need to do is take one of the offending images and play with it in an image editor that will let you see the metadata to figure out what is missing (or present) that is foxing the machine. Compare it against a reference normal image that actually worked OK. The most likely cause is mismatched colourspace and try all four combinations after you have the image looking right on the screen. I am a bit puzzled that you didn't notice a problem when you reviewed the images on screen at the printers before submitting for printing. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
brochure printing,online yearbook,printing,books printing,publishing | elie | In The Darkroom | 0 | August 21st 07 06:40 AM |
free/ premium buisness cards, digital photo printing, canvas printing & alot more | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | March 17th 06 01:39 AM |
Photo Printing Service vs Home Computer Printing? | Dave Johnson | Digital Photography | 1 | July 5th 04 07:08 PM |
Printing from local stores (was, Printing from RiteAid, a question) | TheMage | Digital Photography | 0 | June 25th 04 08:22 PM |
Large format printing system for Giclee printing and more 52' wide 6 color | videorov | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 5th 03 05:43 AM |