If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sekonic L358 or L558?
I'm leaning toward buying 2, X1600 White-Lightning strobes,
triggering them with PocketWizards, and shooting with an F100. So I need a meter and it looks like the PocketWizard feature takes me to Sekonic L358 or L-558. What I need now is flash metering that either will do. But I don't want to not get the 558 if there are features I will either use or later learn to use. It looks like the 558 will do 1 percent spot metering which my F100 already has and I don't use much. It looks like the 558 will fire each strobe separately which looks like I would use. The 558 also meters at f2 at iso 100. I do use an 85mm F1.4 and the 105mm F2 DC. Am I to assume that the 558 would therefore be a better choice because of my fast lenses than the 358? Thanks for your time. Tom (2) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom (2)" wrote:
What I need now is flash metering that either will do. But I don't want to not get the 558 if there are features I will either use or later learn to use. It looks like the 558 will do 1 percent spot 1 degree. I doubt if it's 1 percent. metering which my F100 already has and I don't use much. It looks like the 558 will fire each strobe separately which looks like I would use. The 558 also meters at f2 at iso 100. I do use an 85mm F1.4 and the 105mm F2 DC. Am I to assume that the 558 would therefore be a better choice because of my fast lenses than the 358? The 358 goes down below F/2. From glancing at the specs for the 558 the F/2.0 they mention is for spot mode. Even then nothing stopping you from working around that. If you really want to use F/1.4 and the meter tells you F/2 1/250 then use F/1.4 1/500. I have the 358 and it's a nice meter but if buying today I'd likely spring the extra cash for the 558. It would save me buying a spot meter. If you're 100% sure you'll never want a spot meter then the 358 I think does everything the 558 does. OTOH the difference in price won't get you a nice spotmeter later. Nick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom (2)" wrote:
What I need now is flash metering that either will do. But I don't want to not get the 558 if there are features I will either use or later learn to use. It looks like the 558 will do 1 percent spot 1 degree. I doubt if it's 1 percent. metering which my F100 already has and I don't use much. It looks like the 558 will fire each strobe separately which looks like I would use. The 558 also meters at f2 at iso 100. I do use an 85mm F1.4 and the 105mm F2 DC. Am I to assume that the 558 would therefore be a better choice because of my fast lenses than the 358? The 358 goes down below F/2. From glancing at the specs for the 558 the F/2.0 they mention is for spot mode. Even then nothing stopping you from working around that. If you really want to use F/1.4 and the meter tells you F/2 1/250 then use F/1.4 1/500. I have the 358 and it's a nice meter but if buying today I'd likely spring the extra cash for the 558. It would save me buying a spot meter. If you're 100% sure you'll never want a spot meter then the 358 I think does everything the 558 does. OTOH the difference in price won't get you a nice spotmeter later. Nick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Nick Zentena" wrote in message ... "Tom (2)" wrote: What I need now is flash metering that either will do. But I don't want to not get the 558 if there are features I will either use or later learn to use. It looks like the 558 will do 1 percent spot 1 degree. I doubt if it's 1 percent. metering which my F100 already has and I don't use much. It looks like the 558 will fire each strobe separately which looks like I would use. The 558 also meters at f2 at iso 100. I do use an 85mm F1.4 and the 105mm F2 DC. Am I to assume that the 558 would therefore be a better choice because of my fast lenses than the 358? The 358 goes down below F/2. From glancing at the specs for the 558 the F/2.0 they mention is for spot mode. Even then nothing stopping you from working around that. If you really want to use F/1.4 and the meter tells you F/2 1/250 then use F/1.4 1/500. I have the 358 and it's a nice meter but if buying today I'd likely spring the extra cash for the 558. It would save me buying a spot meter. If you're 100% sure you'll never want a spot meter then the 358 I think does everything the 558 does. OTOH the difference in price won't get you a nice spotmeter later. Nick There is the spotmeter attachment for the L358 -- Regards, Matt Clara www.mattclara.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote:
There is the spotmeter attachment for the L358 Not exactly cheap and the 1 degree isn't very sensitive. EV 5? Better then nothing but if a person intended to add the attachment to the 358 they'd be better off getting the 558 to begin with. Nick |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Matt Clara wrote:
There is the spotmeter attachment for the L358 Not exactly cheap and the 1 degree isn't very sensitive. EV 5? Better then nothing but if a person intended to add the attachment to the 358 they'd be better off getting the 558 to begin with. Nick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote in message ...
I have the 358 and it's a nice meter but if buying today I'd likely spring the extra cash for the 558. It would save me buying a spot meter. If you're 100% sure you'll never want a spot meter then the 358 I think does everything the 558 does. OTOH the difference in price won't get you a nice spotmeter later. Nick I don't understand, the L-358 has 1-degree, 5-degree and 10-degree attachments available. And you still have the Pocket Wizard capabilities. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nick Zentena wrote in message ...
I have the 358 and it's a nice meter but if buying today I'd likely spring the extra cash for the 558. It would save me buying a spot meter. If you're 100% sure you'll never want a spot meter then the 358 I think does everything the 558 does. OTOH the difference in price won't get you a nice spotmeter later. Nick I don't understand, the L-358 has 1-degree, 5-degree and 10-degree attachments available. And you still have the Pocket Wizard capabilities. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Scott M. Knowles wrote:
I don't understand, the L-358 has 1-degree, 5-degree and 10-degree attachments available. And you still have the Pocket Wizard capabilities. The 1 degreee attachment is almost the price difference between the two meters. OTOH you get a meter that can only handle EV5 versus one that handles EV 1. Nick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Scott M. Knowles wrote:
I don't understand, the L-358 has 1-degree, 5-degree and 10-degree attachments available. And you still have the Pocket Wizard capabilities. The 1 degreee attachment is almost the price difference between the two meters. OTOH you get a meter that can only handle EV5 versus one that handles EV 1. Nick |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Minolta or Sekonic | Marcin £. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 30 | July 31st 04 08:22 AM |
Sekonic 558 for zone system | L. R. Kalajainen | Large Format Photography Equipment | 3 | June 1st 04 03:04 PM |
Calibration of Pentax and Sekonic lightmeters? | Severi Salminen | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 2 | February 7th 04 03:48 AM |
FS: Sekonic STUDIO DELUXE L-28C Light Meter | J9 | Photographing Nature | 1 | December 31st 03 01:26 PM |