If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
And now for something completely different
On 7/30/15 8:37 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 09:53:21 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/29/15 5:46 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 01:36:32 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...62409/original Over-sharpened. And the deer seems very surprised by it -- Sandman That's Olympus. I applied no sharpening. Bull****! I applied no sharpening to their JPEG. Prove otherwise, you wizened old man. Who the hell is "their"?!? You're sayin it is not yours? No one can prove evidence of absence: If Alice bakes a pie, she then places the pie on her window-sill. She did not place a pie on her window-sill. Therefore, Alice did not bake a pie. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
And now for something completely different
On 8/1/15 8:19 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:06:37 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/30/15 8:37 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 09:53:21 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/29/15 5:46 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 01:36:32 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...62409/original Over-sharpened. And the deer seems very surprised by it -- Sandman That's Olympus. I applied no sharpening. Bull****! I applied no sharpening to their JPEG. Prove otherwise, you wizened old man. Who the hell is "their"?!? You're sayin it is not yours? "Their" meaning Olympus's in-camera treatment of JPEGs. The only thing I did to the image was downsize it from its native size, that's it. What a crappy thing to do! Thanks for the warning - no Oly products in my future!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
And now for something completely different
On 2015-08-02 10:21, George Kerby wrote:
I applied no sharpening to their JPEG. Prove otherwise, you wizened old man. Who the hell is "their"?!? You're sayin it is not yours? "Their" meaning Olympus's in-camera treatment of JPEGs. The only thing I did to the image was downsize it from its native size, that's it. What a crappy thing to do! Thanks for the warning - no Oly products in my future!! Why would anyone serious about photography care a single whit about how JPEG's are processed in camera? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
And now for something completely different
On 8/2/2015 10:21 AM, George Kerby wrote:
On 8/1/15 8:19 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:06:37 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/30/15 8:37 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 09:53:21 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/29/15 5:46 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 01:36:32 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...62409/original Over-sharpened. And the deer seems very surprised by it -- Sandman That's Olympus. I applied no sharpening. Bull****! I applied no sharpening to their JPEG. Prove otherwise, you wizened old man. Who the hell is "their"?!? You're sayin it is not yours? "Their" meaning Olympus's in-camera treatment of JPEGs. The only thing I did to the image was downsize it from its native size, that's it. What a crappy thing to do! Thanks for the warning - no Oly products in my future!! IIRC some sharpening is incorporated in many resizing algorithms. In PS it used to be a bi-cubic formula. Not sure what it is today. -- PeterN |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
And now for something completely different
"RichA" wrote in message
... On Saturday, 1 August 2015 11:06:37 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/30/15 8:37 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Thursday, 30 July 2015 09:53:21 UTC-4, George Kerby wrote: On 7/29/15 5:46 PM, in article , "RichA" wrote: On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 01:36:32 UTC-4, Sandman wrote: In article , RichA wrote: http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...62409/original Over-sharpened. And the deer seems very surprised by it -- Sandman That's Olympus. I applied no sharpening. Bull****! I applied no sharpening to their JPEG. Prove otherwise, you wizened old man. Who the hell is "their"?!? You're sayin it is not yours? "Their" meaning Olympus's in-camera treatment of JPEGs. The only thing I did to the image was downsize it from its native size, that's it. An image should be sharpened after resizing, not before. You can't do that with an in-camera JPEG which is another reason to shoot raw. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
And now for something completely different | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 3 | July 29th 15 12:12 AM |
D80 question: I'm completely new | Corey | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | June 17th 08 09:58 PM |
Completely and Totally OT | Pudentame | 35mm Photo Equipment | 4 | April 7th 07 12:41 AM |
Is Nikon out completely ? | John | In The Darkroom | 1 | June 20th 06 08:11 AM |
Completely On Topic | John McWilliams | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | April 23rd 06 03:34 AM |