If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! Control-S starts in the current folder, not file-save-as. ..and I find the interface clunky, It's great for such a lightweight freebie that can be coaxed into batching & all sorts of geeky stuff but nowhere near other programs. it doesn't remember window sizes... I view as 'fit only large into frame' and hit enter for full screen. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Ron Hunter wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote: Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! So, go to the preferences menu and CHANGE IT. Which setting is that one, exactly? In my v4.10 I don't believe it exists, but if you can direct me to it, even in a later version, *please* do. In simple terms, if you open an image in the browser to make a quick change and go to Save As, it does not *not* open the current folder (unless that happens to be where you last saved a file). So frequently I have to re-navigate to the current folder. It's not a huge deal, but in my workflow it often adds several clicks, or if I'm not watching what I'm doing, the file is saved in the wrong location. Most programs behave differently, and will show the current folder when using Save as. I am used to, and prefer, that behavior. - its inability to display/save raw (Fuji .raf) files at full size (maybe I'm missing a plugin) such files are proprietary. Yes, they are. Does that make suppport for browsing them less important? Thumbsplus does not show them at all, so it is useless if I am searching through a mixture of image files. IrfanView does, but if you open the file, it is only at a highly reduced resolution. XnView allows them to be opened at full resolution. That makes it more convenient for me, and I'll take a wild stab it is not just restricted to Fuji raw files, and therefore the info might be useful to others. - its very limited choices for things like sharpening ..and I find the interface clunky, it doesn't remember window sizes... Huh? Tell it to. Let me be specific - you *cannot* set the Thumbnail browser to remember window sizes because it has its own "Save Current Layout" function. So it will remember the image viewer layout, but in the *browser* you have to save it manually, so it is not consistent. In my environment where I have both long and short folder names and use the program on different resolution monitors, I would like to have the program simply remember the layout whenever I change it. It doesn't, so I have to remember to save the layout manually. Again, a minor detail, but they all add up. So I'm currently trialling XnView which feels much faster, opens my raw files at full-size, has a nice interface, Lanczos interpolation, good if not great sharpening control, very simple print ratio selections... About the only thing I can fault so far is that it doesn't seem to allow right click and drag (eg to move/copy files), but I'll check the options... I sure hope you make more effort to learn to use it before you complain about it. I'm all ears on what it is I haven't learnt. As above, do tell me how to set the program to use the current folder in a Save As dialog, and also how to get it to remember the window partition size in Thumbnail mode. It's a good program, and deserves an even chance. Yes, it is, but I find XnView is better, so far. Most reviews I found seemed to lean towards XnView, at least for the stuff I want in a browser, but I confess I haven't tried Faststone. I have been using a combination of Thumsbsplus (my old version can't see raw files/doesn't have Lanczos) and Irfanview (has Lanczos and raw support, but limited). So it is looking as if XnView will replace both for me. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Paul Furman wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote: Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! Control-S starts in the current folder, not file-save-as. Thanks Paul. As I explained elsewhere, unless I am missing something, that doesn't help my ineptitude (O:, as it doesn't open the dialog box for me to change the name. I just want to be able to open a file from the browser, make a change, eg resize/whatever, then quickly Save As with just a change to the filename - I don't want to have to browse around to get *back* to the current folder. As I work with several other programs where you can do that (the dialog box opens in the folder where the file was opened), I find it hard to get into the habit.. and I usually don't discover my stupidity until later when I look for the file. ..and I find the interface clunky, It's great for such a lightweight freebie that can be coaxed into batching & all sorts of geeky stuff but nowhere near other programs. Agreed. it doesn't remember window sizes... I view as 'fit only large into frame' and hit enter for full screen. Again, it's just that the browser won't remember its settings, without me telling it to. I'm getting fussy in my old age... (O: I remain pretty impressed with XnView - but I'm sure I'll find stuff in it to annoy me too! |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:11:33 -0600, Ron Hunter
wrote in : Mark Thomas wrote: So I'm currently trialling XnView which feels much faster, opens my raw files at full-size, has a nice interface, Lanczos interpolation, good if not great sharpening control, very simple print ratio selections... About the only thing I can fault so far is that it doesn't seem to allow right click and drag (eg to move/copy files), but I'll check the options... I sure hope you make more effort to learn to use it before you complain about it. It's a good program, and deserves an even chance. Why would you think there would be any more effort than with cameras? Accuracy in both cases is comparable. -- Very best wishes for the holiday season and for the coming new year, John |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
OT - John Navas IrfanView or FastStone?
John Navas wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 16:11:33 -0600, Ron Hunter wrote in : Mark Thomas wrote: So I'm currently trialling XnView which feels much faster, opens my raw files at full-size, has a nice interface, Lanczos interpolation, good if not great sharpening control, very simple print ratio selections... About the only thing I can fault so far is that it doesn't seem to allow right click and drag (eg to move/copy files), but I'll check the options... I sure hope you make more effort to learn to use it before you complain about it. It's a good program, and deserves an even chance. Why would you think there would be any more effort than with cameras? Accuracy in both cases is comparable. Perhaps before smirking smugly, John might like to investigate the issues. He can feel free to point out the setting in Irfanview where I can tell it to make the Save As dialog box use the *current* folder. Then, he can tell me how to set IrfanView's *browser* to always remember the last window layout. If he can do both of those, I will be very appreciative and thank him. If he can't, then he has just embarrassed himself. It's interesting, revealing and unsurprising to note that he has to use another's repost to have a go at me, now that I am one of the many lucky folk in his "twit filter". (O: |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Paul Furman wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! Control-S starts in the current folder, not file-save-as. Thanks Paul. As I explained elsewhere, unless I am missing something, that doesn't help my ineptitude (O:, as it doesn't open the dialog box for me to change the name. I don't know, it's worked that way for me for years. Dangerous in most programs to ctl-S but in Irfanview I get a chance to change. Photoshop may or may not ask more questions after a ctl-S. -- Paul Furman www.edgehill.net www.baynatives.com all google groups messages filtered due to spam |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Paul Furman wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote: Paul Furman wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! Control-S starts in the current folder, not file-save-as. Thanks Paul. As I explained elsewhere, unless I am missing something, that doesn't help my ineptitude (O:, as it doesn't open the dialog box for me to change the name. I don't know, it's worked that way for me for years. Dangerous in most programs to ctl-S but in Irfanview I get a chance to change. Photoshop may or may not ask more questions after a ctl-S. You prompted me to investigate further, to see if there was an option for *that*, and indeed, there is an option for showing the dialog box for the Save function - by default it is turned off.. So, yes, I could set that and try to remember to Save rather than Save As.. but then I'll get into a habit that will cause problems in my other programs... (as you said yourself - "dangerous in most programs"..) I know, there's just no pleasing some folk! But thanks for the tips. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:04:21 +1000, Mark Thomas wrote:
So, go to the preferences menu and CHANGE IT. Which setting is that one, exactly? In my v4.10 I don't believe it exists, but if you can direct me to it, even in a later version, *please* do. In simple terms, if you open an image in the browser to make a quick change and go to Save As, it does not *not* open the current folder (unless that happens to be where you last saved a file). So frequently I have to re-navigate to the current folder. You can use the Save command which will use the image's current folder. Irfanview won't automatically overwrite the original file, but will give you a chance to rename it if you wish. I don't see that this is controlled by any preferences option. I'm using version 4.23, the latest, I believe, and the File menu shows : Save (original folder) Ctrl + S This may be the way previous versions worked, but I don't recall seeing "(original folder)" displayed in the file menu. - its inability to display/save raw (Fuji .raf) files at full size (maybe I'm missing a plugin) A text editor is almost as good as Irfanview for working with RAF files. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
IrfanView or FastStone?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Ron Hunter wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Maybe I'm missing some obvious techniques, but a few things annoy me about Irfanview: - its insistence on remembering where I last saved something - I would MUCH rather it just used the folder I opened the image from! So, go to the preferences menu and CHANGE IT. Which setting is that one, exactly? In my v4.10 I don't believe it exists, but if you can direct me to it, even in a later version, *please* do. In simple terms, if you open an image in the browser to make a quick change and go to Save As, it does not *not* open the current folder (unless that happens to be where you last saved a file). So frequently I have to re-navigate to the current folder. It's not a huge deal, but in my workflow it often adds several clicks, or if I'm not watching what I'm doing, the file is saved in the wrong location. Most programs behave differently, and will show the current folder when using Save as. I am used to, and prefer, that behavior. - its inability to display/save raw (Fuji .raf) files at full size (maybe I'm missing a plugin) such files are proprietary. Yes, they are. Does that make suppport for browsing them less important? Thumbsplus does not show them at all, so it is useless if I am searching through a mixture of image files. IrfanView does, but if you open the file, it is only at a highly reduced resolution. XnView allows them to be opened at full resolution. That makes it more convenient for me, and I'll take a wild stab it is not just restricted to Fuji raw files, and therefore the info might be useful to others. - its very limited choices for things like sharpening ..and I find the interface clunky, it doesn't remember window sizes... Huh? Tell it to. Let me be specific - you *cannot* set the Thumbnail browser to remember window sizes because it has its own "Save Current Layout" function. So it will remember the image viewer layout, but in the *browser* you have to save it manually, so it is not consistent. In my environment where I have both long and short folder names and use the program on different resolution monitors, I would like to have the program simply remember the layout whenever I change it. It doesn't, so I have to remember to save the layout manually. Again, a minor detail, but they all add up. So I'm currently trialling XnView which feels much faster, opens my raw files at full-size, has a nice interface, Lanczos interpolation, good if not great sharpening control, very simple print ratio selections... About the only thing I can fault so far is that it doesn't seem to allow right click and drag (eg to move/copy files), but I'll check the options... I sure hope you make more effort to learn to use it before you complain about it. I'm all ears on what it is I haven't learnt. As above, do tell me how to set the program to use the current folder in a Save As dialog, and also how to get it to remember the window partition size in Thumbnail mode. It's a good program, and deserves an even chance. Yes, it is, but I find XnView is better, so far. Most reviews I found seemed to lean towards XnView, at least for the stuff I want in a browser, but I confess I haven't tried Faststone. I have been using a combination of Thumsbsplus (my old version can't see raw files/doesn't have Lanczos) and Irfanview (has Lanczos and raw support, but limited). So it is looking as if XnView will replace both for me. Perhaps you should upgrade to the current (4.23) version. LOTS of things have been added. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MAC Photo viewer like Irfanview and Faststone ???? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 5 | April 18th 07 11:57 AM |
Faststone 2.5 Beta 2 Out. Major annoyance fixed. | User | Digital Photography | 0 | March 28th 06 09:43 AM |
Faststone 2.4 Final Out | Oscar | Digital Photography | 1 | March 18th 06 09:35 AM |
Discovery in Faststone Image Browser/Editer | Name | Digital Photography | 1 | March 12th 06 03:05 AM |
FastStone Image Viewer quirk? | Terry Pinnell | Digital Photography | 5 | December 3rd 05 11:53 AM |