If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
"RichA" wrote in message ... Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20- $50. What are you talking about here ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
"RustY ©" wrote in message
... "RichA" wrote in message ... Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20- $50. What are you talking about here ? "when it is probably designed" Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. I guess if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning! ;-) Ron |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
On 12/14/09 5:45 AM, in article , "RustY ©" wrote: "RichA" wrote in message ... Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20- $50. What are you talking about here ? You think he would know, 'two'? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:51:08 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: On Dec 14, 8:44*am, "Ron Recer" wrote: "RustY ©" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. *Metal works well, when it is probably designed. *But some cheap Chinese manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20- $50. What are you talking about here ? "when it is probably designed" Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. *I guess if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning! ;-) Ron I know, English is a tough language for some. Properly means correctly. Incorrectly, or improperly, means the product was designed poorly (relying on worn out and s----- Chinese tooling) and the result was failure. I figured that was properly what you meant. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
John A. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:51:08 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: On Dec 14, 8:44 am, "Ron Recer" wrote: "RustY ©" wrote in message ... "RichA" wrote in message ... Allowing any kind of weight on such adapters is a huge mistake. Metal works well, when it is probably designed. But some cheap Chinese manufacturer on the 10,000th thread tapping process with worn out equipment is not likely to produce a sure product, especially at $20- $50. What are you talking about here ? "when it is probably designed" Apparently he is talking about metal that may have been designed. I guess if it wasn't designed it must have just happened with no advance planning! ;-) Ron I know, English is a tough language for some. Properly means correctly. Incorrectly, or improperly, means the product was designed poorly (relying on worn out and s----- Chinese tooling) and the result was failure. I figured that was properly what you meant. I tried to get Google Earth to show me how to get "to" examples of Chinese quality, but no luck. Allen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
"George Kerby" wrote in message ... What are you talking about here ? You think he would know, 'two'? You mean 'You'd thimk he would know too' ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
To examples of Chinese quality
On 12/15/09 1:49 PM, in article , "RustY ©" wrote: "George Kerby" wrote in message ... What are you talking about here ? You think he would know, 'two'? You mean 'You'd thimk he would know too' ? No. Ewe'd thunk he wood no, to? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|