World's Largest Sensor Dust Particle!

OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:

http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/index.php?display=travel%2Fcanadian_rockies_2007%2 Fdust_1.jpg

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final
proof that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com), and over everything else that I shot that day . .
.. in the exact same position in the frame.

My guess is that it is a shaving of some sort from the internals of the
camera, but, for all I know, some camera gremlin decided to take a $%#^
on my sensor.

Luckily I shot a lot of landscapes with easy to replace sky.

Eric Miller
www.dyesscreek.com

On Jun 5, 12:11 am, Eric Miller
wrote:
OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:

http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/index.php?display=travel%2Fcanadi...

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final
proof that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com), and over everything else that I shot that day . .
. in the exact same position in the frame.

My guess is that it is a shaving of some sort from the internals of the
camera, but, for all I know, some camera gremlin decided to take a $%#^
on my sensor.

Luckily I shot a lot of landscapes with easy to replace sky.

Eric Millerwww.dyesscreek.com

Sure it isn't a UFO???

"Eric Miller" schreef in bericht
. ..
OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:


http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/...2Fcanadian_roc
kies_2007%2Fdust_1.jpg

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final
proof that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com), and over everything else that I shot that day . .
. in the exact same position in the frame.

My guess is that it is a shaving of some sort from the internals of the
camera, but, for all I know, some camera gremlin decided to take a $%#^
on my sensor.

Luckily I shot a lot of landscapes with easy to replace sky.

Eric Miller
www.dyesscreek.com


Never seen a flying snake before?

On Jun 4, 11:11 pm, Eric Miller
wrote:
OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:

http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/index.php?display=travel%2Fcanadi...

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final
proof that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com), and over everything else that I shot that day . .
. in the exact same position in the frame.

My guess is that it is a shaving of some sort from the internals of the
camera, but, for all I know, some camera gremlin decided to take a $%#^
on my sensor.

Don't sell yourself short, Judge, the ones on screen left are no
slouches, either! You're right, I clicked the link before I
finished reading and thought it looked like a metal shaving.

"Eric Miller" wrote in message
. ..
OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:

http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/index.php?display=travel%2Fcanadian_rockies_2007%2 Fdust_1.jpg

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final proof
that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com),

I agree with DD-Diver, it's a flying snake. Don't see so many of them
nowadays, but there you are.

and over everything else that I shot that day . . . in the exact same
position in the frame.

Flying snakes are very, very clever that way. They do it all the time.

Neil

At least it's easy to remove.


"Eric Miller" wrote in message
. ..
OK, I challenge anyone to show an image with a bigger, more distracting
hunk of crap on the sensor than this:

http://www.dyesscreek.com/galleries/index.php?display=travel%2Fcanadian_rockies_2007%2 Fdust_1.jpg

Of course, it might not be a dust spot after all. It might be final proof
that rods exist and like to fly over glaciers in Canada
(www.roswellrods.com), and over everything else that I shot that day . . .
in the exact same position in the frame.

My guess is that it is a shaving of some sort from the internals of the
camera, but, for all I know, some camera gremlin decided to take a $%#^ on
my sensor.

Luckily I shot a lot of landscapes with easy to replace sky.

Eric Miller
www.dyesscreek.com